Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Education and Religion
What is Public Systematic Theology? Part One

What is Public Systematic Theology? Part One

Last updated on: January 26, 2024 at 12:30 pm by Ted Peters

What is Public Systematic Theology? Part One 2024-01-26T12:30:30-08:00 Ted Peters

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What is Public Systematic Theology? Part One

Introducing Michael Agerbo Morch

Public Systematic Theology

If you’ve visited my website, TedsTimelyTake.com, you will have noticed my stress on Public Systematic Theology (PST). Oh, yes, PST is conceived in the church. It is born within the circle of faith. Yet, I add that PST must be rigorously critiqued in the academy and then offered to the wider culture for the sake of the common good.

Perhaps I’ve found an intellectual confrere in the young University of Copenhagen theologian, Michael Agerbo Mørch. Mørch has just published his doctoral dissertation with Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, Systematic Theology as Rationally Justified Public Discourse about God. I like the word, Public, in this title. This term, Public, suggests that the theologian’s audience is not just the Church. It includes the university and the wider culture (Peters, The Voice of Public Theology 2023).

“The qualifier ‘public’ demands intersubjectivity with regard to methods, data, presuppositions, and results” (Morch, 2023, 265).

Addressing the Academy and the Wider Culture

For a theologian to speak meaningfully outside the community of faith to the academy or to the wider culture, what gets said must make sense to common human experience as well as shared canons of reason.

Is Morch willing to do this? Yes, indeed. Mørch describes the theological enterprise as scientific. Public systematic theology is a scientific discipline that is intelligible when measured by scientific criteria (Morch, 2023, 17). By science, of course, Morch means Wissenschaft in the German sense of obeying the shared canons of public reason.

“I argue that a modern research university must use language, methods, and concepts that are transparent to a broader field of researchers than a particular ideological group,” such as the Church (Morch, 2023, 30).

For Morch, that “broader” public is the university. Following David Tracy, I would add that beyond the university the PST should engage the wider culture (Morch, 2023, 59). Hence my rendering of PST: public systematic theology is conceived in the church, critically refined in the academy, and shared with the wider culture for the sake of the common good (Peters, The Voice of Public Theology 2023).

Public Systematic Theology is both Scientific and Coherent

Was Jesus a public theologian?

What makes systematic theology scientific and, hence, public? Coherence is Morch’s answer. Following Brazilian philosopher Lorenz Puntel and American philosopher Nicholas Rescher, coherence includes three components. First, systematic theology must be consistent—that is, without contradiction. Second, systematic theology must be cohesive—that is, having the optimal number of relations between the data of the theory (the more the better). And third, systematic theology must be comprehensive—that is, its scope should incorporate the greatest number of data points integrated into a single theological theory (Mørch, 2023, 28). Morch holds that scientific “testing concerns whole theories and that whole theories should be tested for their degrees of coherence” (Morch, 2023, 203).

My own way of cutting this pie is similar. Following Alfred North Whitehead on criteria for evaluating a metaphysical scheme, I believe systematic theology should be (1) applicable; (2) comprehensive; (3) logical; and (4) coherent. So, I feel somewhat at home with Mørch’s scientific criteria — especially coherence — for measuring the success of theology (Peters 2015, Chapter 2).

Public Systematic Theology versus Contextual and Constructive Theology

Along with Morch, I deem coherence to be essential to making theology systematic. But not everyone likes coherence. Today’s wave of constructive theology washes coherence away like a Purell dispenser washes Covid away.

Vietnamese Jesuit Anh Q. Tran describes the contextual diversity that the constructive theologian conscientiously attends to.

“The contextual approach to Christology is a method often favored by theologians from the Majority World or Global South. Following the postcolonial trends in the 1950s and 1960s, these theologians began to explore questions related to their Christological concerns. The Christ that many Majority World Christians received from the missionaries was too Eurocentric, and became less relevant in their new indigenization and social movements. New theological voices began to be heard around the globe, from Latin America to Africa and Asia. In Latin America, liberation theologians tried to understand Jesus from the reality of social economic inequality: Christ is a friend and a liberator of the poor.4 African theologians concentrated on viewing Christ from a cultural and familial lens: Christ is the life-giver, mediator, and leader par excellence.5 Working within diverse cultural and religious backgrounds, Asian theologians tried to make sense of the uniqueness of Christ in relationship to the other world religious figures and founders (e.g., Buddha, Krishna, Confucius, or Muhammad): Christ amid other Asian ways, truths, and lights.6 In these conversations, even the non-Christians joined in: there are visual and textual portraits of Jesus from Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim and Jewish perspectives.” (Tran, 2017)

The self-named constructive theologian collects and assembles this cacophony of hitherto forgotten voices rising up from marginalized groups such as previously colonized societies, LGBTQ+ or queer spokespersons, feminists, and such. Fearing that to systematize such voices would in effect silence them, this group of constructive theologians sets aside the coherence principle. The result for constructive theologians is the acceptance of incoherent theology.

“Methodologically constructive theology forgoes magnum opus, systematic accounts of Christianity, often seen as the ideal expression of systematic or dogmatic theologies. Its aims are open-ended, fallible, revisable imaginative constructions of what it means to be Christian in the world today, confronting contemporary crises and mobilizing against Christianity’s past mistakes and injustices. Constructive theology has grown to be the most prominent and important mode of doing progressive Christian theology today.” (Wyman 2017, 313)

Respecting and honoring hitherto marginalized voices expresses an authentic expression of the Christian heart. Yes, indeed. Yet, I believe the public systematic theologian — whether in Europe or any location — begins by including marginalized voices as a theological source but does not conclude there. PST then raises this source up to critical discourse analysis before proferring a constructive hypothesis. The constructive step requires coherence to measure analytical and rational progress.

Therefore, in contrast to those who call themselves ‘constructive theologians’, I (along with Morch perhaps) insist that the public systematic theologian aspire to coherence. A theology is coherent when what is said about each individual doctrine implies and requires every other doctrinal commitment. This meets the criterion of reason.

Looking ahead to Public Systematic Theology Part Two

In the next post on Public Systematic Theology, I would like to place Mørch‘s proposal for PST into juxtaposition with interreligious dialogue, comparative theology, religious studies, and Dialog, a Journal of Theology. Get ready to click.

Patheos ST 2013 What is Public Systematic Theology? Part One

Patheos ST 2014. What is Public Systematic Theology? Part Two

Patheos ST 2015. What is Public Systematic Theology? Part Three

Public Theology Resources

Ted’s Books on Public Systematic Theology

Ted’s Videos on Public Systematic Theology

Systematic Theology Resources

Public Theology for the Common Good

▓

The Voice of Public Theology. Click here to buy.

For Patheos, Ted Peters posts articles and notices in the field of Public Theology. He is a Lutheran pastor and emeritus professor at the Graduate Theological Union. He co-edits the journal, Theology and Science, with Robert John Russell on behalf of the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, in Berkeley, California, USA. His single volume systematic theology, God—The World’s Future, is now in the 3rd edition. He has also authored God as Trinity plus Sin: Radical Evil in Soul and Society as well as Sin Boldly: Justifying Faith for Fragile and Broken Souls. See his website: TedsTimelyTake.com.

His new 2023 book, The Voice of Public Theology, has just been published by ATF Press.

▓

References

Cattoi, Thomas, 2017. “Flawed Subjectivities: Cyril of Alexandria and Mahayana Buddhism on Volition, Sin, and Karma.” Buddhist-Christian Studies 37, 29-40.

Clooney, Francis X, 2010. Comparative Theology: Deep Learning Across Religious Borders. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Mørch, Michael Agerbo. 2024. Systematic Theology as a Rationally Justified Public Discourse about God. Gottingen: Vanenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Peters, Ted. 2015. God–The World’s Future: Systematic Theology for a New Era. 3rd. Minneapolis MN: Fortress Press.

—. 2023. The Voice of Public Theology. Adelaide: ATF.

Tran, Anh Q., “Jesus Beyond the West: Christological Conversations in the Age of World Christianity,” World Christianity: Perspectives and Insights. Essays in Honor of Peter C. Phan. Maryknoll NY: Orbis, 2017.

Wyman, Jayson. 2017. “Interpreting the History of the Workgroup on Constructive Theology.” Theology Today 73:4: 312-324 doi.org/10.1177/0040573616669565.

Education and Religion

Uncategorized

coherence

constructive theology

contextual theology

Michael Agerbo Morch

public systematic theology

science

About Ted Peters

For Patheos, Ted Peters posts articles and notices in the field of Public Theology. He is a Lutheran pastor and emeritus professor at the Graduate Theological Union. He co-edits the journal, Theology and Science, with Robert John Russell on behalf of the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, in Berkeley, California, USA. His single volume systematic theology, God—The World’s Future, is now in the 3rd edition. He has also authored God as Trinity plus Sin: Radical Evil in Soul and Society as well as Sin Boldly: Justifying Faith for Fragile and Broken Souls. See his website: TedsTimelyTake.com. His new 2023 book, The Voice of Public Theology, has just been published by ATF Press. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

January 10, 2024

Supporting Husbands in Theology

Next Post

January 12, 2024 What is Public Systematic Theology? Part Two

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Afterlife America in Crisis Ancient Alien Apocalypse Art Artificial Intelligence Astrobiology Astrotheology Atheism Big History Buddhist Catholic Christian Nationalism Christmas Comparative Theology Death Ecology Ethics ETI Evangelical Evolution Existential Questions Free Will General Christian Hermeneutics Hindu https://www.patheos.com/blogs/allsetfree/2020/12/sins-we-need-to-talk-about/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Christians+For+a+Better+Christianity&utm_content=43&lct Interreligious Islam Jewish Justice Latter-Day Saints Literature Literature and Theology Lutheran Methodism Mormonism Nonreligious ontology Orthodox Pagam Prayer progressive Christian PT 6 Dignity Public Theology Race racial justice Religious Liberty Romance Satan Scapegoat Science & Religion Science and Religion social justice Spirituality SR 8 Transhumanism Systematic Theology Taoism Ted Peters UAP UFO Uncategorized War

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "If we are thrown into the blazing furnace, the God we serve is able to deliver us"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nebuchadnezzar The high priest Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego Daniel