Fundamentalists and Evangelicals as Outsiders

Last updated on: November 20, 2020 at 12:01 pm by D. G. Hart

Fundamentalists and Evangelicals as Outsiders 2020-11-20T12:01:09-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I did not know it was acceptable to otherize another group but John Fea does so by bringing up a recent sociological study of white and black evangelicals. (“Stigmatize” once worked verbally before “otherize” became a way to stigmatize “stigmatize.”) Once upon a time, some historians, like R. Laurence Moore, saw the value of outsiders resisting the dominant culture in America. Such resistance was not deviant or sectarian but basic to being American. (Think, in contrast, to the way many evangelicals show they are normal Americans by advocating for the latest public health measures during Covid-19.)

Instead of looking at mainstream society to understand American identity, Moore proposed outsiders as alternative version of being American.

outsiderhood is a characteristic way of inventing one’s Americanness. Despite what Frederick Jackson Turner wrote, most people who lived in this country did not gain a sense of what it meant to be an American by going to the frontier. Far more of them gained that sense by turning aspects of a carefully nurtured sense of separate identity against a vaguely defined concept of mainstream or dominant culture. (xi)

A similar pattern defined fundamentalism (and tricked down to evangelicals):

This does not mean that the political involvement of Fundamentalists was cheerfully chosen. Their view of the twentieth century, when stripped of its hysterical assertions of conspiracy, provides a not unreasonable account of what actually happened. American government began to grow in unprecedented ways shortly after 1900. From that day to the present, a great deal of legislation was passed, which though often defended in the language of a value-neutral social science, bristled with moral implications. It did not take religious Fundamentalists long to conclude that they were being caught in a trap. They were losing control of their lives, and the lives of their children, to a new class of experts who denied the forces of moral authority as a guide to pragmatic social planning but who in fact were engineering a evolution in the moral behavior of the country. With a few more turns of the screw, Christopher Lasch and Jerry Falwell might jump into one another’s arms. Ronald Regan, although a divorced man, has been successful with evangelical audiences not only because of his stands on morality, but also because of a personal presence that is completely untouched by the signs that indelibly mark the professional expert in contemporary America. (159)

If you could write that about fundamentalists, Jerry Falwell, and Ronald Reagan in 1986, as Moore did, imagine thinking that the evangelicals who voted in 2016 for Donald Trump were doing something odd compared to what an older generation of conservative Protestants, isolated from the mechanisms of elite power, were doing when they left mainline Protestant churches or voted for politicians who were truly outsiders with the networks of national media and educational institutions.

Imagine too what an evangelical might think of this older outsider identity if he or she, though reared by outsiders, has a Ph.D. from a good university and aspires to be included in national discussions about the affairs of the country. He or she might hold on to an evangelical identity but use that to provide insider information to publishers and editors of publications that can use reports to make sense of born-again voters. But the understanding that so often comes through this back-scratching process is one with insiders setting the terms for what it means to be an outsider or an alien. But if being an outsider is basic to being American, then fundamentalists and evangelicals are no less American than editors of books and magazines.

Image (AP Photo)

2016 Presidential Election

Previous Post

October 28, 2020

Virtue Hiding

Next Post

November 24, 2020 Shocked, Shocked that American Catholics Fund the Vatican

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz