How Evangelicals Can Vote for Joe Biden this November (if the governors let them)

Last updated on: July 9, 2020 at 10:56 am by D. G. Hart

How Evangelicals Can Vote for Joe Biden this November (if the governors let them) 2020-07-09T10:56:35-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Recent protests along with some of the demands of protesters, no matter how peaceful, may make look Joe Biden look much more attractive than say those on the Left who don’t seem capable of providing order and stability.

Consider Al Mohler’s willingness to defend support for President Trump in a recent New Yorker interview:

Yes. President Trump is a huge embarrassment. And it’s an embarrassment to evangelical Christianity that there appear to be so many who will celebrate precisely the aspects that I see Biblically as most lamentable and embarrassing. So I have to make a distinction between voting for a candidate and rationalizing for a candidate, much less being enthusiastic about what I would see as the character faults of a candidate. I intend to vote for Donald Trump in 2020, but my shift is from reluctantly not voting for him in 2016 to what you might call reluctantly voting for him in 2020, and hoping for his reëlection, because the alternative is increasingly unthinkable. But I will not become an apologist for the misbehavior of the President and for what I see as glaring deficiencies in his private and public character.

What stands out in that response is the idea that a political candidate is unthinkable. The Capital Hill Autonomous Zone has perhaps redefined the unthinkable, as in the new normal for unthinkable. If so, then Biden becomes thinkable, especially when you compare him to Black Lives Matter, the activist organization. Here’s how Mohler recently parsed the difference between supporting the statement, “black lives matter,” with the institution, Black Lives Matter:

Because of the link between the Movement for Black Lives and critical race theory, as well as intersectionality, it is not hard to understand why the movement is connected to the sexual and gender revolutions. What binds them all together is the pursuit of liberation. As its leaders stated, the movement seeks liberation from the “Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.” In fact, Western civilization as a whole, according to the leaders of the Black Lives Matter movement, represents an oppressive system that must be destroyed. The language of its affirmations and beliefs—from “cisgender” and “Black trans folk” to “transgender brothers and sisters”—points to just how comprehensively the movement is governed by identity politics, grounded in a worldview contrary to the convictions that guided the Civil Rights Movement.

That same sort of argument cannot be made against either Biden or the Democratic Party. As hostile as Democrats may be to certain conservative or Christian convictions, simply by being part of a political process and following the norms of the political (trigger warning) system, Democrats are not in favor of destroying the American nation or its institutions.

Which could mean that is as possible to think as pragmatically about Biden as Mohler is willing to go with Trump. Back to the New Yorker interview:

It seems to me that your argument for Trump is essentially a utilitarian one. You’re saying, I don’t like this guy. He’s not a good person. He’s really bad. But the issues before us are too important to vote for someone else.

Well, there is certainly a pragmatic, utilitarian dimension to it, but that’s not how I approach moral questions fundamentally. A political question is a bit different in that I’m presented with a binary choice between two candidates, and, even if there are third-party candidates, or you can write in your cat, the reality is that, given the Electoral College, the result is going to be one of those two candidates elected as President of the United States. So, in that situation, we’re forced into a calculus of greater loss, greater gain in the measurements of making a political decision. And, in that sense, once you’re into procedural democracy, you have to enter into some kind of utilitarian calculus, but you have to do so in such a way you keep your soul.

In the context of vandalism and calls for abrogating police forces, never before has the Democratic presidential nominee looked so reassuring.

Image

2016 Presidential Election

Previous Post

June 30, 2020

How the Vandals became Christian

Next Post

July 10, 2020 Losing Whitefield

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz