Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Live by the Polls, Live by the Polls

Last updated on: December 4, 2019 at 3:30 pm   by D. G. Hart

Live by the Polls, Live by the Polls 2019-12-04T15:30:58-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Once more a defense of evangelicalism by trying to disassociate this form of Protestantism from Donald Trump and the surveys of Americans that in 2016 find eighty-one percent of evangelical Protestants voted for the president:

What does it mean to be evangelical? The simple answer is that evangelical Christianity is the religion of born-again Christians. Here’s a little more detailed definition: evangelicals are born-again Protestants who cherish the Bible as the Word of God and who emphasize a personal relationship with Jesus Christ through the Holy Spirit.

How then did the term get so politicized? Prompted by Jimmy Carter’s candidacy and his evangelical testimony, in 1976 the news media and polling agencies realized that the “born-again” vote was a seminal political factor. The Gallup organization in 1976 began asking people whether they had been “born again.” The emergence of “evangelical” as a common term in news coverage of politics was a major landmark in the contemporary evangelical crisis. From 1976 forward, “evangelical” would increasingly connote the white religious Republican base. Evangelical leaders enjoyed the increased media attention, but they failed to recognize that they were losing control of the public’s perception of their movement.

Many “evangelicals” in 2016 (maybe around 45%) still didn’t vote, and those who did vote had exceedingly diverse views of politics depending upon their ethnicity. Most born-again or evangelical African American voters supported Democrats. But white evangelicals who sought power in the GOP had come to represent evangelicalism itself for much of the American public. It would be easy to blame the media for this phenomenon. Much of the media cares about religion only to the extent that religion is connected to scandal, politics or conflict.

But would polling the American public on whether they are born again, or have a high view of the Bible, or have Jesus’ Spirit in their hearts clarify anything?

To discern the strength of Lutheranism in the United States someone might reasonably go to the statistics of the largest American Lutheran denominations. There a student of American Christianity could find membership statistics, the number of congregations, information on regional structures, financial data and even some reference to Lutheran creeds and forms of worship. To discover the influence and significance of evangelicalism a researcher faces an altogether different situation. Because the movement is not ecclesial — in fact, no particular denomination in the United States claims to be the Evangelical Church of America — a scholar needs to figure out a different strategy for assessing evangelicals’ significance. Of course, a historian or sociologist could well look at the records of any number of born-again Protestant parachurch organizations, if such documents were accessible to the public. But without a formal mechanism for belonging to evangelicalism, the subject of born-again Protestantism in the United States requires measurements other than what religion scholars typically use to study churches.

Opinion polls and national surveys have generally been the solution to this predicament. The standard practice, as reflected in scholarly articles and monographs, is to devise a set of questions whose responses will identify the person belonging to the evangelical camp. To be sure, to be fully scientific, those who survey the American public need to conduct polls in an impartial manner. Consequently, a poll examining the religious views of citizens of Wheaton, Illinois, would not necessarily be representative of the entire American population. At the same time, surveys prepared to allow researchers to correlate religious convictions to social views need to be crunched in ways that make computing skills essential. Still, arguably the most important part in collecting survey data is developing an adequate set of questions, one that somehow reflects the distinctive ideas and practices of a religious group but does so in a way that does not appear to lead the witness.

The apparent objectivity of recent opinion polling on religion in the United States has contributed mightily to the impression that evangelical Protestantism is one of the most influential, fastest growing and conservative faiths in the nation. Ever since the 1970s when pollsters and social scientists began to ask questions that probed beyond the standard Protestant-Catholic-Jew categories, evangelicalism has claimed anywhere between 20 and 40 million American citizens. The curious aspect of these recent efforts to count evangelicals is the assumption that asking a few questions about the inerrancy of the Bible or conversion experience will uncover those born-again believers formerly hidden by blunter survey instruments. What if, for instance, pollsters were as intent on discovering… the Lutheran presence in the United States? What if telephone surveys asked respondents about the real presence of Christ in the Lord’s Supper or about the imputed righteousness of Christ? Here the findings might not be all that encouraging, either to researchers hoping to chart a Lutheran element in American society or to Lutheran church officials who believed their pastors were training church members well. For the relatively more complicated teachings of the Lutheran confessions would likely not be as intelligible to the American public. Neither would Lutheran doctrine and practices generate the numbers that the general and fairly domesticated articles of evangelical faith do.

As strange as this example might appear, it helps to illustrate another way in which evangelicalism is a construction, this time of pollsters and the science of public opinion. No other way exists for counting evangelicals other than surveys or opening the Lamb’s Book of Life. Since the latter is closed until the inauguration of the New Heavens and New Earth, those curious about the appeal of evangelicalism are stuck with interviewers, multiple-choice questions, and regression analysis. These tools for measuring public opinion have created an evangelical identity in two important ways. First, opinion polls and surveys use questions that academics or pollsters themselves devise. In effect, these scholars arrive arbitrarily at an idea of what the Bible teaches themselves, without reference to what theologians teach or what churches confess. Second, these measurements of public opinion apparently chart a segment of the population that is evangelical. These statistics can appear very impressive and have undoubtedly influenced politicians and religious enterprises in search of Americans who share certain values. Still, the measurement of public opinion is a strange way to show the strength of a religion that emphasizes the supernatural workings of God upon the human heart and that divine truth matters more than human perception. (Deconstructing Evangelicalism)

What students of American Christianity should measure is not answers to questions asked by pollsters but those asked by church officers of prospective church members.

Image

2016 Presidential Election

Church Life

evangelicalism

Intellectual life

polling data

religious historians

religious history

social scientific surveys

Thomas Kidd

Previous Post



November 28, 2019

At Least Thanksgiving is not a Partisan Issue (the way it was with the New Deal)

Next Post



December 5, 2019 When All Protestants in the United States were Evangelical


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Samson's strength came from his long hair.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Maybe Dr. DuMez Has a Point

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

The Optics and the Reality of Evangelical Elites

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Are Complementarians America's Taliban?

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Thinking Theologically with David French (about aliens)

Putting the Protest in Protestant

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube