Trump is the POTUS that HBO Subscribers Deserve

Last updated on: September 6, 2019 at 1:01 pm by D. G. Hart

Trump is the POTUS that HBO Subscribers Deserve 2019-09-06T13:01:41-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I am still having trouble wrapping my mind around the very high moral standards that President Trump’s critics are using against him and in turn employ to accuse his evangelical supporters of hypocrisy. I understand that Trump is not presidential. Tweeting is not presidential. Nor is it something that most people holding up high the standards of presidentiality are willing to give up.

Still, consider the fundamentalist-like indignity that often emerges when Trump shows he is exactly who he was when he was appearing on the Howard Stern show or in New York City’s tabloids. It is surprising on some level that Americans elected Trump. Just as surprising is the resort to Leave-It-To-Beaver standards to prove the illegitimacy of Trump’s presidency.

For instance, some have expressed a complete and utter refusal to show any loyalty to the President because of his immorality.

Donald Trump is a liar who clearly obstructed justice. He has forced others to lie to the American people on his behalf. Some, like Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a self-professed evangelical Christian, lied for the president on multiple occasions. (That is a lot of slips of the tongue). Others refused to lie for him. The Mueller report reveals that Trump’s presidency lacks a moral center. He should be impeached.

On the flip side of the coin, President Obama has instructed Americans — partly in reference to Trump’s antics — what a POTUS should do:

We should soundly reject language coming out of the mouths of any of our leaders that feeds a climate of fear and hatred or normalizes racist sentiments; leaders who demonize those who don’t look like us, or suggest that other people, including immigrants, threaten our way of life, or refer to other people as sub-human, or imply that America belongs to just one certain type of people. Such language isn’t new – it’s been at the root of most human tragedy throughout history, here in America and around the world. It is at the root of slavery and Jim Crow, the Holocaust, the genocide in Rwanda and ethnic cleansing in the Balkans. It has no place in our politics and our public life.

Those are noble and inspiring sentiments. But they don’t apply to Hollywood or even the way television and motion picture producers portray American presidents. Indeed, Hollywood has taught Americans to be cynical about politics and to regard wicked, venal, and narcissistic politicians as not only typical but funny. Consider the HBO series, Veep. Here’s one description of it from The Hollywood Reporter:

Is Veep the most foul-mouthed show on TV? If Selina Meyer were to answer the question, one might imagine her saying, “F— yes.”

The writers of the Emmy-winning HBO comedy, which wraps its fifth season June 26, have long turned swearing into an artform. With Julia Louis-Dreyfus’ Selina and her delightfully dirty mouth at the helm, her motley crew of political lackeys launch their insults and political doublespeak with such rapid fire, the show has taken on a laugh-out-loud-and-you-might-miss-it quality.

…”Julia’s very fond of saying that when we had the idea of this boob-ish, foul-mouthed candidate that is Selina Meyer, that it was fiction and perhaps now, not so much,” Mandel continues. “There’s no Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders character, but all of these things kind of go into the soup and you reflect on them later. The good news is, when people are so unhappy with the system, they are looking at a way to laugh at it.”

Full disclosure, I did not turn the show off with all of the f-bombs. But when the series devoted an entire episode to the c-word, I thought about it. Not even Larry David’s Curb Your Enthusiasm came straight out with the c-word (initially) but needed to treat it as a misspelling of “aunt.”

Never mind Veep’s vulgarity, the show’s writers and producers say that this is what the United States needs:

The series began during the Obama years, and presented Meyer as the real-life president’s shadow-self in the American imagination – a Democrat who acted like a Republican (or worse) behind closed doors. She drained all the nicety from leftwing politics, plastering on a smile on the campaign trail, and then regarding her constituents with open contempt once she was away from the cameras. The writing staff has elevated foul language to a fine art, and Meyer got many of the most cutting lines. In one particularly memorable chewing-out, she compares an idiot colleague to a certain pastry used as a sex toy, in that “it doesn’t do the job, and it makes a [f-ing] mess”….

Veep has proven itself the only program capable of lampooning the otherwise comedy-proof Trump. Its black heart sets it apart from the scads of humorists taking puny potshots at a man begging for and immune to being made fun of. Fiction exists to show us the humanity in the inhumane; Veep’s superpower has always been its hatred, clean and true. Beyond Trump lies nothing, a vessel as empty and selfish as government itself. All you can do is laugh.

So, while some Americans continue to believe in the importance of POTUS’ moral leadership, why do many of those same critics of the current president fail to condemn Hollywood (which had a hand in creating “the Donald,” after all). If President Obama really means that any language that demeans others has no place in “public life,” and if critics of Trump use Obama to fault the forty-fifth president, are they going to lead a campaign to boycott cable television and Amazon studios? My bet is they won’t. Imitating the Southern Baptists’ campaigns against Disney was never very sexy.

Image

2016 Presidential Election

moral leadership of POTUS

Veep

Previous Post

August 30, 2019

When Extremism Goes Mainstream

Next Post

September 11, 2019 Why Are "Liberals" So Insecure that They Need the Times' Green Light to Dump on Conservatives?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz