Clarity on Presbyterian Combativeness

Last updated on: July 12, 2019 at 3:34 pm by D. G. Hart

Clarity on Presbyterian Combativeness 2019-07-12T15:34:41-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Some folks in the Reformed tradition do not care for the theological debates and divisions that have marked Presbyterian church history. As such, you will find those invoking John Newton’s advice — he’s the author of Amazing Grace — about how to treat opponents:

Of all people who engage in controversy, we who are called Calvinists are most expressly bound by our own principles to the exercise of gentleness and moderation.

But with some frequency you may also find Presbyterians who celebrate their forebears’ participation in the American War for Independence. Here’s one example:

As those of us in the United States this week celebrate freedom from British governance, consider the many ways that Presbyterianism influenced the decision to enter a war for independence and take up arms against a magistrate:

Only a Presbyterian understanding of Romans 13 would allow us to enter a war. The Bible calls for submission to magistrates, but Presbyterians understood the nuances that allowed for rebellion against tyranny. (See James M. Wilson’s Establishment and Limits of Civil Goverment for an exposition of Romans 13.)

It was psalm singing Presbyterians like Rev. James Caldwell who helped win some battles–when paper for musket wads was unable to be found–Isaac Watts’ Hymnbook was used instead. “Give ’em Watts, boys!”

King George referred to the war for Independence as the “Presbyterian rebellion.” The Anglicans were never fans of rebellious presbyterians.

The prime minister of England, Horace Walpole said in Parliament that “Cousin America has run off with a Presbyterian parson.”

Some of this is the Presbyterian version of “Cafeteria Catholicism,” that is, picking and choosing which parts of your church’s teaching and heritage with which to identify and praise, as if those choices add up to the genuine article.

But it is also a function of misunderstandings about fighting. According to the Westminster Confession of Faith, Christians may lawfully serve in the military, which would seem to make room for fighting:

It is lawful for Christians to accept and execute the office of a magistrate, when called thereunto: in the managing whereof, as they ought especially to maintain piety, justice, and peace, according to the wholesome laws of each commonwealth; so, for that end, they may lawfully, now under the new testament, wage war, upon just and necessary occasion. (23.2)

In that case, those who appeal to Newton to say that Calvinists only fight in “gentle” or “moderate” way is to misunderstand the nature of warfare.

By the same token, those who celebrate the American founding may also want to pay attention to the Confession of Faith on the nature of Christian liberty and how different it is from civil or political liberty:

because the powers which God hath ordained, and the liberty which Christ hath purchased, are not intended by God to destroy, but mutually to uphold and preserve one another, they who, upon pretense of Christian liberty, shall oppose any lawful power, or the lawful exercise of it, whether it be civil or ecclesiastical, resist the ordinance of God. (20.4)

Christians may legitimately fight in the military or serve as enforcers of the law (police), but they may not oppose lawful authority. Such would be disobedience against God.

The lesson is two-fold: 1) Calvinists may fight. 2) Calvinists should not rebel against their rulers.

If you keep those points in mind, disagreements and disputes in the church are easy.

Image

War for American Independence

Previous Post

July 9, 2019

The Main Thing about Evangelicalism

Next Post

July 17, 2019 Religion Unregulated

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz