Evangelical Politics: Same As it Ever Was

Last updated on: March 27, 2019 at 5:13 pm by D. G. Hart

Evangelical Politics: Same As it Ever Was 2019-03-27T17:13:54-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Jemar Tisby repeats the refrain that white evangelicals who support President Trump are hypocritical:

In the 2016 presidential election, exit polling tells us, about 8 out of 10 white evangelicals who voted pulled the lever for Donald Trump. This information came as a disappointment to many and, to some, as further indication of the moral hypocrisy of white evangelicals.

Those who promote “family values,” espouse equality for all people and stand for biblical ethics chose to embrace a man whose words and actions often place him as the antithesis of all that evangelicalism supposedly represents.

Part of the problem with this analysis is that evangelicals’ critics rarely acknowledge that the alternatives to Trump in American politics are hardly holy and righteously pristine. Was Hillary Clinton a bastion of the gospel? Is Nancy Pelosi that political leader in Washington that fosters evangelical holiness?

Another feature of Tisby’s argument that fails is the idea that evangelicals need to think more deeply about how they approach politics:

Amid all the debates about who is a “real” evangelical and what that term actually means, these data present an opportunity for churches to probe the way they teach their members to think about political participation in a representative democracy. Such discussions are crucial for any group that purports to offer “good news.”

In fact, Tisby is thinking about politics the way evangelicals have in most circumstances (with Trump the exception that proves the rule): they think about politics as an extension of morality. Rather than tallying up considerations about economic policy, national interest, international relations, immigration — the list goes on — Tisby makes a moral calculation that evangelicals are hypocrites for supporting a sinner. This would not be the first time that a sinner has occupied the White House. But it is one of those rare times when critics are asking evangelicals to be the scolds that so many critics condemned twenty years ago when Bill Clinton was president.

Meanwhile, Tisby’s concerns mainly repeats the moralism that even defenders of Methodism believe the followers of John Wesley inflicted on the United States:

The Temperance and Prohibition movements that crystallized in the late nineteenth century were the cherished political fruit of that era’s Methodist piety. They adopted the Calvinist Puritan view of America as a called-out nation providentially summoned to greatness and holiness. In their eschatology, God’s Kingdom is realized through American democracy, a view Bishop Simpson shared. But they importantly added Methodism’s distinct, hopeful confidence in perfecting a holy society that successfully conquers all major social vices. The original Methodist Prohibitionists were mostly theologically orthodox and believed in the power of human sin and the need for personal repentance. But they assumed the Holy Spirit could and would conquer all social vice just as the Spirit could perfect the individual believer. Methodist perfectionism both made Prohibition initially a success and also inevitably an ultimate failure.

Tisby may want to score points by showing the inconsistency of evangelical support for Trump — are there still points left in that game after two years of play? — but his approach is hardly the result of probing political analysis. It is the same old calculus of good versus evil and how Christians can be holy even while voting, supporting, protesting, or governing.

Image

2016 Presidential Election

Previous Post

March 25, 2019

The Difference a Degree Makes

Next Post

March 29, 2019 Race, the Sabbath, and Resolutions

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz