Is Evangelical the Only Kind of Protestant?

Last updated on: November 26, 2018 at 3:48 pm by D. G. Hart

Is Evangelical the Only Kind of Protestant? 2018-11-26T15:48:49-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Roger Olson observes that the current critics of evangelicalism, the so-called voices from the margins, want to be free from the white-male dominated power structures responsible for defining evangelicalism:

After listening to the panelists’ papers and the ensuing open discussion, I wondered if 1) white, heterosexual men (like myself) have any place in this conversation anymore (I think not), and 2) if “evangelical” is now losing all meaning.

Again, for all our faults and failures, we at least attempted to come to some kind of consensus about the “center” if not the “boundaries” of this spiritual-theological type called “evangelical.” I did not hear that at the symposium. I heard a lot of finger-pointing and complaining and calling for (seemingly) unlimited diversity “at the table” whenever “evangelical” is being discussed.

My only qualm is the SEEMING “unlimited diversity.” Nobody said that, but once LGBTQ people are taken for granted as part of the conversation on equal footing with everyone else…I have to wonder.

Now, one of my points here is simply to report that this was, I think, the first time I ever heard evangelical scholars ASSUME that LGBTQ people can be evangelicals equally with “straight” evangelicals AND that they MUST have a role in defining evangelicalism—equally with every other group of people.

At the end of the two hour long symposium I was beginning to wonder if “evangelical” has any meaning. There was a general sense (to my mind, anyway) that the conversation about that conducted over many years by people like Mark Noll, George Marsden, and David Bebbington (no names were mentioned that I heard) is not even considered a changeable platform but something to be discarded and forgotten except as a relic of a past evangelicalism dominated by white, heterosexual men.

As frustrating as this situation may be, Olson does not seem to marvel at the ongoing appeal of evangelicalism to those “on the margins.” One might think that those who associate evangelicalism with white male heterosexuals and don’t like the company involved in being evangelical — that these people would opt for another form of Christianity. After all, in addition to the historic communions of Rome and the Eastern Orthodox churches, Protestantism has by some estimate over 30,000 denominations. And if none of those expressions of Christianity suit the progressive or social justice minded, why not make up your own version of Christianity? It is a free country, after all.

Yet, the biggest critics of evangelicalism still want to be evangelical. Why?

Once upon a time, the reason might have been political. Being evangelical meant that you belonged to a voting bloc that gained you some attention from the major parties and the presidential nominees. But since for most critics, the EIGHTY-ONE PERCENT!!! who voted for Trump is reason to complain about the whiteness and straightness of evangelicalism, you certainly don’t remain evangelical for the political advantages.

So the problem remains. Lots of people who fault evangelicalism for its racism, nationalism, misogyny, and general meanness still want to be evangelical.

It is a phenomenon that rivals the current discussions among Roman Catholics and the sex scandal of whether or when to leave. At least for Roman Catholics, leaving the church has all sorts of historical significance. Rome represents a tradition, allegedly, that goes back to Peter and Jesus in Matthew 16. Do progressive evangelicals possibly risk anything on that order of magnitude? If you leave evangelicalism you refuse a version of Protestantism that goes back to George Whitefield?

What could ever be the problem with that? Whitefield was a straight white man who owned slaves, after all.

Image

2016 Presidential Election

Previous Post

November 21, 2018

Michael Gerson's Hypocrisy

Next Post

November 28, 2018 Are Protestants who Convert Christians before Conversion?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz