Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Putting the Protest in Protestant

If Cats Declare the Glory of God, Why not Unregenerate Truck Drivers?

Last updated on: September 28, 2018 at 2:52 pm   by D. G. Hart

If Cats Declare the Glory of God, Why not Unregenerate Truck Drivers? 2018-09-28T14:52:55-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Joe Carter thinks that after 500 years, Protestants are finally understanding vocation:

While vocation is broader than just our occupation, our jobs are often a primary way we serve our neighbors. As TGC’s Theological Vision for Ministry states, “Christians glorify God not only through the ministry of the Word, but also through their vocations of agriculture, art, business, government, scholarship—all for God’s glory and the furtherance of the public good. Too many Christians have learned to seal off their faith–beliefs from the way they work in their vocation.” . . .

My grandfather spent most of his adult life working as a school janitor. I suspect that during his lifetime he never heard another Christian tell him his job could be considered his calling. Even more dispiriting, he’d face the same situation today, as nearly three-fourths of Christians today would be hesitant to say that God called him to such work.

“Even janitors and accountants serve the common good,” says Cory Maxwell-Coghlan, a senior writer at Barna Group. “When we conflate God’s kingdom with the institutional church (i.e., only clergy or missionaries are engaging in full-time sacred work) we restrict the scope of God’s work and kingship.”

What does it say about the church when we dismiss the work of men and women who provide a safe and clean learning environment for our own children as unimportant? What does it say about us when we act as if we don’t believe God could call anyone to such worthy labor? What do such dismissive attitudes reveal about our beliefs, not only of calling and vocation but about God himself?

The problem here is two-fold. First, Carter leaves out the non-Christian janitors who provide safe and clean learning environments. The Protestant doctrine of vocation is not simply about the work that Christians do. It is also tied to the image of God in all people and the task that God gave to Adam and Eve when he told them to multiply and subdue the earth. Divine providence, the way God superintends his creation, relies upon a host of secondary causes. The sun dries out flooded land. Aspirin relieves pain. Farmers grow food that sustains farmers and workers. The work that human beings do, then, is part of God’s care for all of his creation. A farmer doesn’t have to be a Christian for his food to feed hungry mouths. To be sure, a Christian farmer may seek to glorify God by devoting his activities to serving God and loving neighbor. But countless activities that men and women perform, Christian or not, is a service to others and a testimony to the original calling God gave to human beings to care for the earth.

Heck, even critters glorify God and they don’t have souls:

What kind of a worldview does a wren exhibit when it sees the neighbor’s cat crouching in preparation to pounce and flies to the nearest telephone line? Is the bird’s knowledge of the feline species somehow diminished because he can’t theorize about his knowledge of cats and their objects of backyard prey?

What about a baseball player who can spot the difference between a curve and a four-seam fastball, all within a nanosecond, and swing his bat while uncoiling his body to launch the baseball into the right field stands? If the batter can’t explain his theory of hitting, if the Phillies won’t hire him when he retires to be a hitting coach, does that make his knowledge of crushing mistake pitches illegitimate? Does every batter have to be a Ted Williams for his hits to be certain and his runs-batted-in certified? Did Richie Allen not win the American League MVP for 1972 because he could not theorize about what he did in the batter’s box?

Cats are going to hunt birds. It’s what they do. Americans are going to play baseball and calculate batting averages. It is what they do as human beings. That non-salvific activity, that non-sanctified work, is still part of glorifying God because it reflects the creator and because it is part of what it means to be a cat or a human.

The second problem with Carter’s notion of vocation is that it seems to allow him to pat The Gospel Coalition on the back for helping Christians see how they can glorify God transforming culture, from the high of political power to the low of cleaning urinals. Again, this gives Christians a privileged position, as if non-Christian politicians are somehow unwholesome or illegitimate. Instead of using vocation to underwrite efforts to turn everything into a “gospelly” endeavor, the better and Reformational way is to think of vocations as callings that God gives to all people (not to mention to all parts of creation. Working for the common good is not restricted to Christians. In fact, when Christians begin to think they are working for the common good they invariably overreach and conflate the common good with the good of Christians (who want to make society look like the church or the Christian home).

The solution is to secularize the doctrine of vocation by locating it in the realms of creation and providence, spheres that apply to all people, and to cats, planets, and water. The good works of sanctification are in a different realm, the one of redemption. Keeping creation (and providence) and redemption straight, allows keeping straight church and state, theology and science, pastors and police, believers and unbelievers.

Image

Church Life

evangelicalism

sacred/secular distinction

cats

creation

human nature

image of God

Joe Carter

providence

The Gospel Coalition

vocation

Previous Post



September 26, 2018

Doubts about One Accuser, Credibility for Another

Next Post



October 2, 2018 Before Kavanaugh, Mencken


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Ruth's mother-in-law?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hannah Elizabeth Naomi Mary

Related posts from Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Maybe Dr. DuMez Has a Point

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

The Optics and the Reality of Evangelical Elites

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Are Complementarians America's Taliban?

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Thinking Theologically with David French (about aliens)

Putting the Protest in Protestant

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube