In 2008 Hillary Clinton Would Have Received Less than 19%

Last updated on: May 1, 2018 at 5:30 pm by D. G. Hart

In 2008 Hillary Clinton Would Have Received Less than 19% 2018-05-01T17:30:38-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A dip into an older book of mine for a Sunday school lesson last week led me to read about anti-Clinton sentiments about a dozen years ago (just short of the 2008 presidential primaries). Here are the first two paragraphs from A Secular Faith:

For many devout American Christians, the thought of the president of the United States pausing during a time of national peril or uncertainty to pray to the god of the universe is a comforting one. This was certainly the impression I took away from a recent summer seminar at an prominent American university where scholars had convened to discuss the American founding and legal barriers to religious involvement in the political process. The idea of a president looking for divine assistance appeared to most of those assembled as at least innocent if not becoming. If God doesn’t exist, prayer certainly couldn’t hurt. But if divine assistance was available to the petitioner, wasn’t it better for the most powerful man in the free world to acknowledge his dependence upon powers mightier than his rather than proudly thinking he could manage on his own? In fact, wasn’t this the sort of activity in which a long line of reverential presidents engaged, from the Father of the country to honest Abe?

Since most of the academics in the room were conservative of some stripe, the thought experiment immediately conjured up images of the current occupant of the Oval Office, George W. Bush, whose invocation of divine blessing and acknowledgment of his own faith has appealed to many American Christians who view secularization as one of the chief threats to the well-being of the nation. But complications ensued when this group of conservatives considered the hypothetical of someone like Hillary Rodham Clinton offering a prayer for help in her conduct as the chief executive of the United States. At this point, the image turned from consoling to annoying, even alarming. Questions about her sincerity, her comprehension of the proper matters for which to pray, her willingness to follow a wise course of action irrespective of any answer to her prayer — all these came to mind. And of course, the second version of this thought experiment posed the inconsistency that so often accompanies the way Americans mix Christianity and politics. Just as the thought of Clinton beseeching divine favor drives conservatives crazy, the thought of Bush doing so is equally infuriating to liberals and Democrats. The problem, as American history shows, is that the party in power rarely sees itself through its opponents’ eyes; it doesn’t consider that its appeal to divinity might not only look self-serving but also make self-delusion more likely.

Notice, this observation came after going to a conference of evangelical academics — PROFESSORS! — where support for Bush was strong and the same for Clinton was unthinkable. These comments were also commonplace when I wrote them in 2005 and posed little difficulty to the secular Jewish-American editor who was publishing this book. In other words, few evangelicals in 2005 were horrified to think that practically all born-again Protestants would vote for the Republican presidential nominee. Nor was a publisher, who has likely voted Democrat his whole life, outraged to read that evangelicals did not trust Clinton.

So why all the fuss about the 81% who didn’t vote for Hillary in 2016?

Image

2016 Presidential Election

Previous Post

April 27, 2018

Everyone's an Evangelical

Next Post

May 2, 2018 Coalition is not Communion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz