Giving Your Testimony is what Protestants Do (even when they become Roman Catholic)

Last updated on: August 11, 2017 at 2:47 pm by D. G. Hart

Giving Your Testimony is what Protestants Do (even when they become Roman Catholic) 2017-08-11T14:47:40-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last month we (some of us) read about Elizabeth Bruenig’s conversion from Protestantism to Rome. For her Roman Catholicism represented a place within which to resist the modern world:

As a Protestant, I had learned that commentaries on Scripture were just that: the ephemeral striving of mere mortals, bereft of meaning in their own right, useful only insofar as they happened to be correct according to one’s own judgment. But more and more I was convinced I could not carry out a Christian life by myself. I did not want to read and draw my own conclusions; I wanted guidance, clarity, authority. God had not seen it fit to leave Adam alone in Eden, nearer to God than we are now. He needed help, and God gave it to him.

I began to see God had already done the same for me. I just had to accept it.

Plenty of converts to Catholicism prize the church’s prudence when it comes to evaluating modern conditions. Because the church is a pre-modern institution, it does not take for granted many of the givens of modernity: that personal freedom ought to be endlessly maximized, for instance; that the most important goal in life is finding oneself; that politics and religion are two sharply and rightly separate spheres. . . .

Part of the reason I found Catholicism’s challenge to modernity so compelling was that it critiques aspects of our world that mostly go unquestioned, even by those who have disputes with liberalism in sexuality, marriage and so on. For me, the case in point was property ownership, the underlying question beneath all our current debates about poverty and wealth.

Does Ms. Bruenig pay any attention to the questions that surround the way the church manages personal property through the Institute for the Works of Religion (also known as Vatican Bank), the scandals that have surrounded that institution, or the challenges that Pope Francis, the alleged vicar of Christ himself, has had in implementing reforms of said bank? She does not.

But she offers a very personal account of her turn to Rome, one that captures well her own experience, which is actually the way that Protestant testimonies usually go. Instead of emphasizing the corporate understanding of faith — Rome as an institution — Protestants (born-again ones) stress the conversion experience.

As does Ms. Bruenig.

Then today we read of Matthew Schmitz’s experience in moving from Protestantism to Rome:

When I entered the Church, I felt that I was receiving an inheritance that had been unjustly denied me. It was as if I had entered an ancestral house so grand that possession of it could never be complete. There would always be more closed-off corridors, hidden gardens, and forgotten chambers where things dear to my forebears gathered dust. Though I might visit these rooms and even restore them, I would only ever live in the new wing prepared for me.

Looking back now, I am surprised that I felt this way. Protestant worshippers at churches with names like Faith Community, Westerly Road, and Capitol Hill Baptist had always been welcoming to me. Catholics are comparatively guarded—almost possessive—about their faith, and they have never embraced me so fully. Even their churches are less cozy. Despite fifty years of Catholic effort, it is still the Protestants who know how to give worship a domestic warmth and simplicity.

Yet Catholicism gave me a home that Protestantism could not. Though I knew well as a Protestant that my inheritance was in Christ, it was only in Catholicism that I found my native land. Unlike low-church Protestants, Catholics are fool enough to think that their visible church corresponds to the invisible one. They suppose that they can bring Christ into this world directly through the Mass and indirectly through pilgrimage and shrine, fast and feast. Catholics cannot help but make this world reflect, however dimly, our heavenly home.

Since the experience of so many converts to Rome is so different, readers may conclude that the home Schmitz found was one of his own personal making.

But I wonder if he is really “fool enough” to think that a church with all the history and baggage that comes with it corresponds so closely to the invisible church. Bank scandals, whiskey priests, Crusades? Invisible church is not what immediately comes to mind.

Roman Catholics don’t have a monopoly, for that matter, on bringing “Christ into the world directly.” Granted, Protestants talk a lot more modestly about it and acknowledge their reliance on the word of God read and preached and the work of the Holy Spirit. Still, most Protestants think they have Jesus in their heart while many Roman Catholics believe in appearances of Mary and her ongoing work. If only Roman Catholics would limit themselves to Christ’s presence.

I wonder too about Schmitz’s claim that Roman Catholics cannot help “but make this world reflect, however dimly, our heavenly home.” Frankly, Protestants were the far greater offenders in trying to immanentize the eschaton. From John Winthrop’s “city on a hill” (actually Jesus, but let’s not get picky) to the Eighteenth Amendment, Protestants have tried way too often to “improve” this world on the basis of fairly flimsy ideas about what heaven will look like. Protestants should have taken some cues from American Roman Catholics who simply went about their business for much of their history (until they hit the suburbs in the 1950s) and lived modestly, not attempting to be busy bodies even while running all sorts of urban political machines. Even worse, if the institutional church has so much trouble looking like the Christian’s heavenly home, why would you even think about changing the secular world?

All of which leads me to think that leaving Protestantism is a lot harder than converts to Rome think.

Image

Institute for the Works of Religion

Matthew Schmitz

Pope Francis

Previous Post

August 8, 2017

From Charles Finney to Lena Dunham: The Oberlin Factor

Next Post

August 15, 2017 Look How Tim Keller and Donald Trump Agree

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz