Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Didn’t Evangelicals Vote Overwhelmingly for George W. Bush?

Last updated on: November 15, 2016 at 1:37 pm   by D. G. Hart

Didn’t Evangelicals Vote Overwhelmingly for George W. Bush? 2016-11-15T13:37:04-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So what’s so bad about voting for Donald Trump? Katelyn Beaty explains:

This election, I didn’t personally know any evangelicals who were vocally supporting Trump. Many of us were troubled by the other candidate, to be sure. But, as so many wise evangelical leaders had noted, electing Trump would seriously harm our already fragile democracy and undo the church’s witness, and I believed the white evangelical community would take heed.

On Wednesday, I woke up to an evangelical family I no longer resembled.

Evangelical at its root means evangel or “good news.” We proclaim to follow a man who chose to affiliate himself with the poor and dispossessed, who called the political and religious leaders of his day to account, who saw and loved people whom others had discarded.

To be sure, no political leader can or should try to enact the good news in policy. Christians of good conscience have and will continue to elect leaders of different ideologies, then go about the daily task of loving their neighbors.

But when evangelical starts to sound like very bad news for very many Americans, it has drifted far from its roots. A prophetic consensus has emerged that U.S. evangelicalism is irreducibly linked with white privilege.

Yet, as Ms. Beaty admits in this piece, she has been an evangelical for twenty years since she was 13. If my math is correct, that would have made her 21 when 79 percent of evangelicals voted for George W. Bush. Why no outrage then, since some Americans questioned just how Christian the forty-third president was:

Bush’s religious backers like Haggard point to the president’s policy agenda as evidence of his spiritual ideals. The Christian spirit of compassionate conservatism, they say, infuses Bush’s commitment to policies like faith-based social services; many believers hold that a poverty of the spirit is at least partly to blame for such social ills as drug abuse and crime. Bush’s stance on abortion and other so-called life issues is also in concordance with the conservative Christian worldview. And the administration’s proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, while theologically dubious, certainly resonates among more traditionalist believers. Even the war in Iraq, on which Bush famously consulted his heavenly (rather than earthly) father, was proffered as an Old Testament-style battle between the forces of good and The Enemy, as such Christians refer to Satan. “Our responsibility to history is already clear: to answer these attacks and rid the world of evil,” the president declared after September 11.

But the aforementioned issues are Christological softballs, as it were. After all, Bush’s positions on such matters land him safely in Republican territory. Never once has the president crossed party lines to uphold Christian principles such as aiding the poor or caring for the environment, for example. Much more of the president’s record reveals a man with a far deeper commitment to partisanship, or just simply being right — even at the expense of clear biblical teaching.

Evangelicals disappointed in other evangelicals is par for the course. It’s what Christians do. But to suggest that this election is unprecedented is to engage in denial. Evangelical support for Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bob Dole, George W. Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney was by the lights of elites in the media and the academy hair brained. Support for Trump may be more hair brained. But it’s all on the hair-brain spectrum.

Ms. Beaty should not console herself that evangelicalism was fine politically before 2016.

Image

2016 Presidential Election

evangelicalism

moralism

Donald Trump

George W. Bush

Katelyn Beaty

Previous Post



November 10, 2016

They'll Know We Are Christians by Our Vote?

Next Post



November 18, 2016 Scholarship In Black and White


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is traditionally believed to have written the book of Ecclesiastes?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Solomon David Ezra Isaiah

Related posts from Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Maybe Dr. DuMez Has a Point

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

The Optics and the Reality of Evangelical Elites

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Are Complementarians America's Taliban?

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Thinking Theologically with David French (about aliens)

Putting the Protest in Protestant

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

He’s Making A List… A Great Way to...

I’ve been having a problem. It’s a problem with distraction, and if...

To Halloween or Not to Halloween… That Is...

This week, as I put the finishing touches on my church’s Trunk...

Do You Know Yourself?

The great theologian, John Calvin, said that nearly all the wisdom we...

Creation as Secondary to Judgment

Creating is a most human act. A good canonical (classical) education will...

Nuggets of Wisdom—Fall 2026

Every few months or so I like to share quotes that I...

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube