Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Isn’t the Bible Enough?

Last updated on: February 13, 2015 at 5:42 pm   by D. G. Hart

Isn’t the Bible Enough? 2015-02-13T17:42:51-04:00 D. G. Hart

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I haven’t reached Exodus yet, but Greg Thornbury has alerted me and other read-the-Bible-through-in-a-year readers that Moses and the exodus are important. In fact, without an actual historical figure such as Moses and real historical event such as the exodus narrative, the integrity of the New Testament is up for grabs:

. . . if the scholars are right that is: “No Jews in Egypt means no Exodus. No Exodus means the foundation of Judaism is a myth. And for Christians it means that Jesus Christ and the writers of the New Testament got it wrong because they all accepted the reality of Moses and the Exodus and built their teachings on them.”

That’s precisely right. At several points in the Gospels, Jesus refers to Moses and his commandments as though Moses really wrote them. At the Last Supper, Jesus connected his physical death—blood and body—with that of Moses’ Passover Lamb sparing the life of the Israelites during the Plague of the Firstborn. Did Jesus predicate his own sacrificial death on the cross upon an event that never occurred? If that is the case, the entire covenantal nature of the biblical narrative falls apart. Jesus of Nazareth cannot be “the new Moses” if Moses never existed.

The idea of the exodus never having happened surely would throw a wrench into the formation of both ancient and modern Israel. And the ties between the Old Testament narratives and Christ are certainly worth highlighting in any attempt to discredit the Old Testament.

But Thornbury may go an inference too far when he worries what turning Moses into myth will do to the United States:

Not only does Christian faith rest squarely on the historicity of the Moses account. So does the foundation of law and order in Western society. Our traditions of common law and jurisprudence go back to Jewish notions of covenant. Without Moses, we lose divine sanction for limits on government and the power of human authorities. What is the goal of this constitutionalism rooted in Torah? According to the Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court, it “seeks to prevent tyranny and to guarantee liberty and rights of individuals on which free society depends.” Everyone who cares about liberty, then, has purchase in the debate over Exodus. Were the teachings of Moses from Moses? Were they rooted in a transcendent source? Those are some pretty important questions.

This is apologetic overreach and suspicious history. Paying attention to the pagan Greeks and Romans sure would seem to make sense of the form of government that the American founders created. The Hebrews knew something about monarchy (though their experience with it was not pretty). But Moses and the prophets were not exactly proficient in republicanism, constitutions, or federalism. Perhaps the best indication of the difficulty involved in tying biblical covenant theology to modern liberal societies comes from the Puritans, those almost-Americans who had the largest Israel complex of all European settlers in North America. The Puritan understanding of the covenant was not much of a guarantee to the freedoms or rights of Roger Williams or Anne Hutchinson (for starters), both of whom had to leave Massachusetts Bay for holding views contrary to the established authorities.

I wish Thornbury had quit while he was ahead. The implications of turning Moses into mythology are sufficiently high for the authority and infallibility of Scripture. Why would he feel the need to lower the stakes by raising such ephemeral matters as the affairs of princes whom the Bible tells us not to trust.

(Image: Moses Trampling the Crown)

Old Testament

Civil Religion

Greg Thornbury

Puritans

Previous Post



February 11, 2015

Is It Okay to Skim?

Next Post



February 16, 2015 One Thing Everyone Should Know about Sola Scriptura


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2016 Presidential Election 2020 Presidential Election Apocalypse Bible in American Life Biblical authority Books and culture Calvinism Church Life Civil Religion Culture Wars Doctrine evangelicalism Gullibility Heaven and Hell Intellectual life Jesus Ministry modernity moralism Nationalism New Testament Old Testament Otherworldiness Otherworldliness Paul Peter Piety Popular culture Protestantism Psalms Puritans Race Roman Catholicism sacred/secular distinction Sex Shameless Self Promotion Sports Ten Commandments U.S. politics Uncategorized vulgarity worship

Select a Month January 2022 October 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the consequence of David’s sin with Bathsheba?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bathsheba was taken from him Their first child died David was exiled His kingdom was taken away

Related posts from Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Are Complementarians America's Taliban?

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Pastors as Prophets to the Holy Nation

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

If the Separation of Church and State is...

Putting the Protest in Protestant

Evangelical

Secular Universities Now As Religious as Puritan Harvard

Putting the Protest in Protestant

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube