Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Profession of Faith

Home
Careers, Workplace and Religion
Professional Integrity in Uncertain Times, Part II

Professional Integrity in Uncertain Times, Part II

Last updated on: February 19, 2017 at 1:41 pm by Sarah Conrad Sours

Professional Integrity in Uncertain Times, Part II 2017-02-19T13:41:17-06:00 Sarah Conrad Sours

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image via Pixabay. Public Domain.

Once again, though it seems like the times they are a-changing, someone is calling for his professional colleagues to stick to their profession’s ethical guidelines.

A psychiatrist who literally wrote the definition and diagnostic criteria for one of the many mental health disorders our current president is accused of having has pointedly asked armchair diagnosticians to knock it off.

Physicians and psychiatrists have always, rightly, been leery of diagnosing people whom they have not examined.

And they have always, rightly, been leery of publicly speculating on the medical or psychiatric conditions of public figures.

There are a dozen or more reasons for this hesitancy, but none more appropriate here than the power of mental health labels.

A label that includes a mental health or cognitive component profoundly alters its wearer’s relationship with the world.

Mental illness and cognitive impairment have been used to justify abuse, neglect, isolation, medical assault, and murder; sadly, these abuses have been authorized by, facilitated by, or carried out by the very medical professionals who should have been helping their patients.

The labels stigmatize their wearers, as well. Think of all the insulting words that have or used to have precise medical meanings but are now (also) mere insults.

Retarded.

Idiot.

Moron.

Imbecile.

Insane.

Psychotic.

Schizoid.

Cretin.

I’ve heard all of these words used in the last week alone, as insults to people for whom the (obsolete) medical terminology was completely inappropriate.

A just and appropriate horror of the potential for (and history of) abuse has led mental health professionals to certain self-imposed restrictions, among them the disinclination for long-distance diagnosing or encouraging public humiliation of a supposedly mentally ill figure.

Now is not the time to do away with those professional standards. It would be especially troubling to use psychiatric labels to discredit or remove our political threats. We’ve been down that road before. It doesn’t go anywhere we want to revisit.

Whatever the solution to our current political troubles, I think Dr. Frances is right that our approach must be political.

It will not do to remove an incompetent or dangerous political figure by slapping a psychiatric label on him, if for no other reason than that people who genuinely suffer from mental health disorders deserve better.

Uncategorized

in the news

professionalism

Previous Post

February 3, 2017

Professional Integrity in Uncertain Times

Next Post

July 29, 2017 This Is How Women Work

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2017 February 2017 October 2016 August 2016 June 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! See, your king comes to you, righteous and victorious, yet humble and riding on what?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A white horse A chariot A camel A donkey