Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Preventing Grace

Home
Evangelical
Family, Parenting and Religion
Who is Spoiling for a Fight

Who is Spoiling for a Fight

Last updated on: June 17, 2024 at 1:03 pm by Anne Kennedy

0 Comments

Who is Spoiling for a Fight 2024-06-17T13:03:33-04:00 Anne Kennedy

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is an article going around on the app formerly known as Twitter that dovetails nicely with something I’ve been thinking about all weekend. Having raised six basically sensible and sane children, I have been mulling over what I did and if it worked. That, and the fact that I work with very young children at Church, I’ve been trying to re-learn a skill I began to develop as a young mother, which I am finding most useful for nearly all situations I encounter. But let’s look at the article first.

It’s over at Christianity Today, and it’s called “I‘m an Evangelical Parent of Adult LGBTQ Children. Now What?” The long subtitle underneath explains that “My theology is squarely orthodox. Now I need fellow Christians to help me work out a sustainable vision of day-to-day life with my children.” I had a whole lot of problems with the piece, as you might expect, but I don’t want to go into them all right now. I only have time to leap to two sections, and then to answer the question “Now What” from a parenting, human relationships perspective.

Here’s the first bit:

As parents, we’re already rooted in the understanding that God created humanity in two distinct forms that we call male and female, and that sexual intimacy is reserved for monogamous marriage between a man and a woman. Our question is how to relate to our children, especially adult children, when they choose lives not rooted in that understanding. We’ve made clear to them what we believe. Now what? I suspect that much of the reaction to Unconditional and Begg is the result of worry that open consideration of these prudential questions will inevitably result in significant theological drift with dire consequences for the church and for those to whom it ministers. It’s a fear amplified by a culture war mentality, which has been present in evangelicalism since the fundamentalist-modernist controversies of the early 20th century. This mentality tends to cast LGBTQ people as our enemies in that fight, enemies to be constantly confronted with statements of truth.

First off, I wish “we” all would stop saying “we” in articles like this. This is very much the style of CT, but it trips me up every single time. Who is the “we” in “we’re already rooted in the understanding that God created humanity?” I don’t think very many people, even Christian people, and certainly not the writer of this article, are rooted in that understanding because of the next part of the sentence: “in two distinct forms that we call male and female.” The whole point is that God made them male and female. What we call male and female is the truthful linguistic reflection of God’s creative action. The theological depth of God making us male and female feels excessively trite when phrased that way. Anyway, leaving that to one side, the writer explains that he has made this “understanding” “clear” to his errant children. They understand that he believes in a traditional sexual ethic so now what?

Given that the writer lumps Alistair Begg together with Andy Stanley, I didn’t have high hopes for what he would say next, and I wasn’t disappointed.

Trying to understand, for himself, why this is such a big deal, he wonders if he hasn’t felt free to interrogate how he should relate to his erring children because even asking the “question” will “inevitably result in significant theological drift with dire consequences for the church and for those to whom it ministers.” Thus, as expected, it becomes evident that “we”–in so far as any collection of Christians still exists–have been badly defeated. The answer is embedded in the question. Yes, it is a sign of significant theological drift to ask it. The consequences are unutterably dire, witness that the writer so carefully hedges his problem so as to exclude the real answer. What is it that St. Paul says about certain kinds of sins not even being named among you? This shouldn’t be a “question.” But it is, so here we are. And no, it isn’t a “culture war mentality.” Rather, it is the reality that some Christians who have been living in a haze of theological turpitude are only just now waking up and are trying to gather together some thoughts and strategies at half past the eleventh hour that are calculated to fail, for that is the desired outcome.

The writer of the piece is still under the mistaken impression that real Christians today “tend to cast LGBTQ people as our enemies in that fight, enemies to be constantly confronted with statements of truth.” Honestly, of whom is the writer speaking? I don’t know of anyone today who is doing this. We are up a global, multi-billion dollar effort to normalize sexual deviance, an effort that is doing pretty well and is catching and destroying the souls and bodies of people who, you know, bear the Imago Dei. “We” do have an enemy. Probably more than one. And there is a real battle going on. And the only way out is to constantly tell the truth. Of course, your own child who is caught in the clutches of sin that leads to death is not your enemy, but how best are you going to love that child? That is essentially the stated question. But the writer has been careful to ask it in such a way that excludes the real answer.

Ok, so here’s the second bit I want to unpack:

It is good to speak truth, yet adopting a permanently confrontational posture makes it impossible for us to heed the apostle Paul’s exhortation to the Roman Christians: “So far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all” (Rom. 12:18, ESV). And while searching for answers to these practical questions of relationship has, for many, been but a stop on a journey away from orthodoxy, that’s not the only possible outcome. The task at hand is one of correct practice (orthopraxy), which requires discernment, and discernment is a naturally fraught enterprise. What makes it fraught, of course, is our fallibility. For while God’s Word is wholly trustworthy, our application of it may not be. Sometimes we choose to be lenient when we should be firm, or severe when we should be flexible. Regardless of our spiritual diligence and good intentions, there’s always a chance we will make the wrong choice. Add to this the sobering awareness that even correct choices can result in pain for those we love, and discernment becomes downright daunting.

It is, indeed, “good to speak truth.” Only I don’t like the word “Truth” by itself like that. You can’t “speak truth.” You should tell The truth. Be truthful. In your day-to-day life, don’t lie. Don’t lie to yourself, to God, or to your children. Lying is bad. “Truth” is not some sort of amorphous cloud that can be spoken if you have thought about it long enough. You either speak true things that are consummate with reality and the Word of God, or you lie. It isn’t your job, necessarily, to deliver “Truth” into the ears of people. Rather, when you are talking to people about subjects that concern you both, there will be many occasions to fudge things out of cowardice, to lie, to protect yourself against their disapprobation by declining to speak a truthful word out of season. Parenting is one of the most tempting opportunities for that sort of thing. Throwing in a little Bible here–in so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all–is a very Anglican way out. It’s impolite to make people feel uncomfortable. I am not an impolite person. Therefore I never have to speak on this subject.

So let me describe to you the actual “task at hand,” as he says. Here is the work of the parent, be it for a toddler, a ten-year-old, a twenty-year-old, or your benighted middle-aged-son who decides to leave his wife and run away and form a polucule.

Don’t Try To Be The Holy Spirit. The first task of the parent is not to try to be God and live in the head or even the heart of your offspring. You need to be a person who understands that you can’t control what other people, especially your children, think of you. You can only act. You can’t manage the reactions of other people.

The best way, for me, to think about this is that it is not my job to give someone else a fight–to stand in their way–when the person they’re really angry with is God. If my child, or any child, comes at me in rebellion, spoiling for a fight, it is my first responsibility to get out of the way–emotionally–of their anger with God.

Because, face it, children, whether they are adults or babies, they may be adorable but they are wicked, as I myself am. I don’t need to become weepy with love. I need to do what is best for them. That means sidestepping their anger rather than gathering it up as a precious treasure to be solved by my thoughtful and nuanced whimsy. If I take on their anger and feel it, I give them a way out of resolving their troubles with the Most High. Something wonderful happens when you step out of the way of someone’s anger. If they were expecting a fight, when they fly past you, they become disoriented because what they expected didn’t happen. They stand there, surprised, perhaps even dazed. This gives you a moment to come round the back and tell the truth clearly regarding the particulars of the situation.

In a big classroom full of a lot of little kids, when one kid is just desperate to wreck my lesson and make everyone else miserable, it is necessary for me not to get into a headlong collision with that child, to take his or her anger into myself, and to escalate. What I very mildly do is ask if she or he is having a hard time and if she or he would like to “go out in the hall for a minute.” Invariably the kid says yes, walks out in the hall, twirls around, and comes back to hear more about Jesus.

If your child comes home and says, “I’ve decided to move in with someone to whom I am not married and if you don’t affirm me our relationship will be broken forever,” I would stop, stand very still, pray for a few minutes, look deep into that child’s eyes, and say, “Oh honey, I’m so sorry. I love you so much. I guess our relationship is broken forever now. Do you want to talk about it some more? Or do you want a cup of tea?” In other words, you do not accept to carry the emotional burden being handed to you by your child. If they are spoiling for a fight, it is God who is their adversary. You keep stepping out of the way, and then coming up behind them, and telling them uncomfortable and blessed things about Jesus.

Ok, sorry this was so long. I’ve gotta run. Find me on Substack for more parenting tips!

Family, Parenting and Religion

Relationships and Religion

Demotivations with Anne

Culture Watch

Previous Post

June 10, 2024

I'm Over Forty And I Won't Be Reading All Fours

Next Post

June 24, 2024 Dress for Action like an Anglican

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Do you take dish soap with you? Or just rely on the boiling water to ..."

LucyL

Some Reasons To Go Camping

"This is brilliant. The fam has been watching the re-make, but I have avoided it ..."

LucyL

Of Pies and Men

"The depraved don't know that they are depraved."

Charlie Sutton

Don’t Lose Heart

"I'm sorry to hear that (ie 2.) I do hope if you get to enjoy ..."

LucyL

7 Takes In All Directions

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category books Catechesis of the Good Shepherd Children in Conversation culture watch Daily Devotions Demotivations with Anne faith alone for the grandparents GAFCON In conversation with children In the News Kitchen Notes Lambeth Learning Notes Life Going On Men are Human Notes from Home Pictures Reading the Bible Saturday Links Sermons Signs of the Apocalypse The Bad Word Association The Prayer of Jonah Travel Notes Uncategorized Witless Wednesdays Work and the Christian

Select a Month June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Bartholomew" mean in Aramaic?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Lord is my Shepherd Son of Talmai Fisher of Men Servant of God

Books by This Author Books by Anne Kennedy

See All Titles »