Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Preventing Grace

Home
Evangelical
Of Pies and Men

Of Pies and Men

Last updated on: July 14, 2022 at 9:42 am by Anne Kennedy

Of Pies and Men 2022-07-14T09:42:26-04:00 Anne Kennedy

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Spent most of yesterday making a small mountain of food, all from an old book called Pies and Pastries—one of those lovely tomes ennobled by clear, bright, perfect pictures of various pies and dumplings and tarts. The oldest child (now 20) thought we should attempt various confections we never have time or inclination to try. Those included an apricot tart (too sweet, I think), plum dumplings, palmiers, puff pastry squares surmounted with bacon and mushroom, a quiche, and—to stretch me to the limit—salmon “en croute” which just means “in dough.” None of it came out looking like the pictures, tragically, but the salmon (I was not able to accomplish the complicated shape of an actual fish) was delicious, as well as the plum dumplings and the mushroom puffs. The apricot tart, I think, is worth trying again just to recalibrate the sugar.

The second part of the festivities included lying around for three hours trying to agree on a movie. This happens to us all the time because we’ve basically seen everything we care about, and also, everyone is so contrary. After not being able to watch the only one we were interested in, I think because we live in the wrong country, we settled on buying one episode of the new All Creatures Great and Small. We didn’t have very high hopes because it was made fairly recently, but we were prepared to be as happy as possible.

Unfortunately, it was just like every single thing made in the last five years, depressingly so. And to confirm this fact, we went back and watched the first episode of the original series. The difference was, well, not astonishing because we totally expected it, but instructive. Here are some of the differences and my feelings about them. I think they illuminate the problem with everything (think of it as a grand unified theory of how exactly we are doomed).

One

The second series, in an effort (I imagine) not to offend original lovers of the first series, based their efforts on the first series rather than the book itself, which made the episode feel both stale and stressful at the same time. Why did they do this? Perhaps to be respectful, but probably because reading comprehension is a lost skill that no one possesses anymore.

Two

Attempting to build in narrative suspense, the second series begins with young Herri0t in Glasgow getting a letter from Farnon offering him an interview. But the writers and directors know we viewers are all dumber than bags of hammers, and that we may not understand how anxious a thing it is to be looking for jobs when there aren’t that many. So they have young Herri0t’s mother pressuring him to “give up his dreams” and “go work on the docks.” In contrast to her anxiety, the meek and tender father encourages young Herri0t to go after those dreams after all. Because, you know, the you-running-after-your-dream motif has to still be shoved down the gullet of every single tv show and movie, even though it has been shown to be a foolish and impossible idea, and full of tragedy along the way. But we have to have it, because we do. It’s like a religious creed, only one that is much more boring, communicating no mystery or transcendent meaning whatsoever.

The creators of the series, however, by shoving young Herri0t on a train and making him say goodbye to his mother and his dog, ruin the very charm of the work, which is that Herri0t arrives in a small town and suddenly takes up a whole life, complete and enchanting in all its contours. His past doesn’t come into it, except obliquely referenced here and there (Glasgow). The effect of those initial scenes, for me, as a mother, as it were, is that they did provide suspense, but of the wrong kind. Instead of being happy and settled and sorted in Yorkshire, vicariously as it were, I sat there wondering in which episode (which I won’t be paying for) “young” Herri0t would write to his mother to have his dog sent on. Which one is it? And why did they have to do that? And why doesn’t Siegfried have a pack of hounds in his own car anyway? Why is there only one dog in Yorkshire?

Three

Which brings me to my main criticism. In the original series, the actors—and this might amaze you—have the simple and understandable job of playing the characters in the series. I can’t remember any of the actors’ names, but there is James, of course, and Tristan and Siegfried and Mrs. Hall, etc. Not only are all the actors of different ages and of varying levels of attractiveness, they are, how does one say it? Embodied? The actors playing James and Siegfried are only having to play James and Siegfried. That is their only task.

But in the new series, all the actors are having to play men and women playing their various parts. Another level of work has been added to the job of the actor. This, I think, is because the kind of men who lived way back then (what, like fifty years ago? eye-roll) apparently are incomprehensible to us now, so there has to be a sort of caricature-esque overlay, as well as lots and lots of weird explanatory moments that make the dialogue stilted, embarrassing, and weirdly dry. All the humor had to be taken away to make room for ques about what men in the past used to be like. Herri0t , for example, won’t be able on his own to figure out what sort of person Siegfried is, Mrs. Hall has to clue him in.

Just as an aside, Mrs. Hall is far too young. It’s so ridiculous that all the actors look exactly the same age. Really, badly done on the casting effort, badly done.

Maybe the acting and writing get smoother in later episodes, but, as I said, I probably won’t be paying to hate-watch them all. What I find so interesting, however, is that the modern idea of what it means to be a man has, however subtly, radically shifted. The comedic timing of the first series is so wonderful because James and Siegfried are aggressive. They take risks. They don’t have to explain themselves. They exercise restraint. Basically, all the stuff that has historically been the property of masculinity until recently drives the plot and humor forward. Of course, the original writers didn’t wake up and say that, because it was the pond we were all swimming in. But we are no longer swimming in it, and so, to make themselves comfortable (I bet) the new writers and directors provide historical and social commentary by way of overdoing the drama of even being a man.

Likewise, there is the question of Mrs. Hall. In the first series, she is testy rather than scolding. This is a big deal in the consideration of that bygone category of “femininity.” The old Mrs. Hall treats all the men as if they are adult people. She is older than them but she doesn’t act like their mother. The new Mrs. Hall babies and scolds everybody. Siegfried really needs to worry about his health because he’s exhausting himself (hard to believe since he looks exactly the same age as young Herri0t ). Herri0t needs to put himself out there and take risks and it’s not his fault that he couldn’t hold his liquor and so rearranged the cats because he’s just a young kid and not an actual man who just took a degree in veterinary medicine. No one, of course, would know to eat a proper breakfast unless Mother told them to. Knowing that you, the viewer, are, as I said, dumber than a bag of hammers, Mrs. Hall ‘splains all the essentials thereby turning Harriet and Siegfried into children as dumb and helpless as the audience.

In conclusion, I’m sad about almost all television created today. This series could have been good, but it appears that the creators mistook various superficial aesthetic details—smoking a pipe at the right time while driving in the car, for example, and the shape and color of the bus—for what truly made the original series a classic, which was the good writing and acting. If a modern person would try making a movie or a TV series that wasn’t religious propaganda for the ideological thought du jour, I would be so delighted to plunk my money down and watch it.

Photo by Illiya Vjestica on Unsplash

culture watch

Men are Human

Just Plain Sarcastic

Previous Post

July 13, 2022

Try Not To Grow Weary In Doing Good

Next Post

July 15, 2022 And Then We Ate

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category books Catechesis of the Good Shepherd Children in Conversation culture watch Daily Devotions Demotivations with Anne faith alone for the grandparents GAFCON In conversation with children In the News Kitchen Notes Lambeth Learning Notes Life Going On Men are Human Notes from Home Pictures Reading the Bible Saturday Links Sermons Signs of the Apocalypse The Bad Word Association The Prayer of Jonah Travel Notes Uncategorized Witless Wednesdays Work and the Christian

Select a Month June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city did Paul visit where the people worshiped "an unknown god"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Corinth Rome Ephesus Athens

Books by This Author Books by Anne Kennedy

See All Titles »