The Body Does Matter

Last updated on: May 27, 2021 at 7:42 am by Anne Kennedy

The Body Does Matter 2021-05-27T07:42:51-04:00 Anne Kennedy

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was reading a lot of LeaveLoud tweets and feeling very discouraged about the state of all things, and then happened upon this–a review of a book about fashion. It looked like it was going to be interesting, just the thing, in fact, to take my mind off of all the badness, but no, not really. Everything…everything is about power. It starts like this:

On the subject of fashion, men have been quite the sly devils over the years. They’ve used fashion to enhance their authority and elevate their stature, all while communicating a message of elegant refusal. Generations of men would have the culture believe that they’re far too preoccupied with business, government, technology and other so-called serious pursuits to involve themselves with the flourishes of fashion. In their repetitive dress code of tailored suits, khaki trousers and golf shirts, they send the message that they’ve renounced superficiality and frivolousness as beneath their gender’s dignity. Fashion, and all of its precious silliness, is left to the ladies. And this masculine dress code has served men well. Centuries have gone into the making of these rules and assumptions — and a bit of sleight of hand, as well. Men were not always inclined toward minimalism.

And then this:

In assessing dress, Ford notes that there really isn’t anything particularly feminine or masculine about clothing. Trousers and dresses can be tailored to fit any body — anatomy is beside the point. Ruffles and feathers and sequins are not inherently feminine. And pinstripes and herringbone are not masculine. That they have these gendered attachments is simply a matter of power. “The Great Masculine Renunciation overturned the symbols of status, sex, and political power established in the late Middle Ages and created a new sartorial vocabulary for the expression of individual personality. It made understatement into a new kind of status symbol, which required savoir faire as well as ready cash to exhibit,” Ford writes. “And, because it was a masculine phenomenon, it excluded women who sought power and status.” This transformation created layers of contradictions and countless hurdles for anyone who wasn’t fluent in this new, subtle language.

I guess I won’t be bothering with the book, which is fine because I don’t have time anyway. What discourages me so much is that this is such a boring way to think about anything, let alone clothes. Also…I hate the specious idea that “there isn’t anything particularly feminine or masculine about clothing.” I feel like the totality of human history (and the Bible) would beg to differ. The biological reality of people’s actual physical bodies has meant that certain kinds of things to wear are felt (like with the actual body) to be more feminine and other kinds more masculine. Women deciding to adopt the clothes of men, in order that they might have the power of men, has worked out pretty poorly for me, for whom nothing fits and nothing is feminine per se. “Trousers and dresses can be tailored to fit any body,” But They Aren’t Are They. No one has the skill, the money, or the desire to make trousers to actually fit “bodies” that have, perhaps, given birth to other “bodies” a lot of times.

I really hate how people use the word “body” nowadays (get off my lawn TM) all by itself to refer to the whole person. I have probably complained about this before. I imagine that it was meant to make the point that the body of the person matters. And I suppose it is sort of pithy–black and brown bodies. But to my ear, it feels like it actually emphasizes the bifurcation of the soul from the body, and the sense of people being commodifiable units. It has a whiff of death–the “body” being the primary way that one speaks of a person who is about to be put in a grave, and whose spirit is no longer there. Though one might say, “rest in power” at the death of a person with a certain color of body, yet there remains the wretched helplessness of an eternity where the soul and body are ever separated from each other, did not God himself join them back together by the blood of the cross.

If the body really did matter, someone would care about the clothes and how they fit. If we did have power, we would be able to make the body and soul fit together always. The human family has never had the desire, nor the ability to do either of these things with the perfection, love, and beauty the human soul craves. God does though. At some point, the body will rise from the grave to be reunited with the soul, and the clothes will be more beautiful than any of us can imagine. And then we will restfully and comfortably live together with the Lord–those who want to be with him, that is. If a person wants to loudly leave that communion, that Body, for some paltry “power,” that is a great tragedy, not some reason for rejoicing. The body does matter–what you eat, what you wear–so much that God was willing to bind himself to us in his own Body forever.

Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

Demotivations with Anne

Previous Post

May 26, 2021

God Is Not Like You

Next Post

May 28, 2021 7 Takes about Men and Trees and Paint

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category books Catechesis of the Good Shepherd Children in Conversation culture watch Daily Devotions Demotivations with Anne faith alone for the grandparents GAFCON In conversation with children In the News Kitchen Notes Lambeth Learning Notes Life Going On Men are Human Notes from Home Pictures Reading the Bible Saturday Links Sermons Signs of the Apocalypse The Bad Word Association The Prayer of Jonah Travel Notes Uncategorized Witless Wednesdays Work and the Christian

Select a Month June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What year was the Temple in Jerusalem destroyed by the Romans?

Select your answer to see how you score.

70 AD 120 AD 586 BC 33 AD

Books by This Author Books by Anne Kennedy

See All Titles »