Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Preventing Grace

Home
Evangelical
Reading the Danvers Statement II

Reading the Danvers Statement II

Last updated on: March 1, 2016 at 8:31 am by Anne Kennedy

Reading the Danvers Statement II 2016-03-01T08:31:00-04:00 Anne Kennedy

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday I started writing a bit about the Danvers Statement, which I said can’t be too awful because it seemed to make all the right people mad, but I quibbled over whether such a statement should be made at all. Today I want to look at parts of the statement itself, and probably offend some more people, so here we go.

The writers of the statement lay down ten reasons for believing that such a statement is necessary. These include cultural confusion about masculinity and femininity, the unraveling of marriage, feminism, the devaluing of motherhood and “vocational home making”, the lessening cultural shame over illicit sexual relationships, the rise of pornography, bad bible reading, and mistrust of the bible.

I would have to agree with the bulk of their diagnosis–it is a mess out there. Men and women don’t know how to relate to each other. There is a War on Marriage, a War on Men being Men, and even, as others have rightly noticed, a War on Women. If a man ends up winning a woman of the year award, you can safely say the categories are completely wrecked.

The question is, when things are as bad as they are, what is to be done about it? The statement lays out the case for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, complete with bible references as a starting point for recovering what has been lost. And, again, there isn’t anything particularly wrong with it. I think, though, that when everything is this broken, this list of the way men and women ought to conceive of themselves and function, even in the church, is not the right beginning point.

Let’s take two average, churched, college graduates. They believe in Jesus. They are trying their best. They care about and “have a heart for the world”. But from very early on in their childhoods, she’s been told more times than she can count that she can do anything she wants, that she shouldn’t let anything hold her back. And, being a girl, the schools have been very good to her. She’s an excellent student. She loves math and science. She’s good at sports. She plays an instrument. She is a well rounded, well educated (by the standards of the day), competent person. And, with a four year degree at her back, she is expected to make something of herself. She has to work or she will be seen to be “wasting” her mind, her education, her gifts. After all that work, there is no way she will be comfortable being at home without some other occupation. She may want to be home and not work somewhere else, but if she chooses that way she will have some residual guilt about all the money. If she works and juggles babies, she will have guilt about the babies.

But what parents, looking at this rather depressing scenario, ever say to themselves, ‘let’s not educate our girls’? Does anyone say that?

Now to the young man. All this while he’s been growing up too. But it hasn’t been quite the same golden time. He likes math and science, but he fidgets in class and his teachers are always irritated with him. He forgets stuff at home and his mother is always on his case. No matter how many times he’s told, he never can do his own laundry. He likes to retreat with his friends just to get away from all the nagging. He has to go to college too, but he has no idea what he wants to do with himself. He suffers through many long lectures by strident feminist teachers whose main purpose in life is to make sure he doesn’t get above himself.

So our two young people fall in love and get married. And I would just like to know, of what possible use can the Danvers Statement be to them? At the most basic point, when they wake up in the morning, they do not know how to relate to one another. He knows, more than he knows anything, that he must not cross her or get her back up. She doesn’t want it to be like this, but she easily falls into telling him what to do. She doesn’t enjoy it, but all her education has equipped her not so much to make a pleasant home, but to competently juggle everything. Their most basic hurdle is to learn not how to be men and women, as we over the past two hundred years have been accustomed to thinking of them, but how to be human. They don’t know how to think of the Other’s humanity.

In other words, even Christian parents, let alone those in the secular realm, aren’t passing along the cultural picture of masculinity and femininity pictured point by point in the statement. And I would say, it is a cultural picture. Certainly, for the most part, it is essentially a listing of scripture, but because these verses have been preached in a certain way, when men and women hear them, they are immediately seeing an image of something they cannot attain, and even if they could, their families, and even their Christian families, would not be happy about it.

Sure, these scriptures are for every culture. Nobody reading the bible should think that it is ever just for them. It is for the whole world. And so every single culture should read the bible. But that’s the point. I think every person should read the bible–the whole bible. And when that happens, some interesting things might happen.

Imagine a remote village far far away, where there isn’t any bible, and the men do certain things, and the women do certain things, and there is a very fixed structure and order to life, and then the bible comes to that village. When the people open it and read it, they are going to look with fresh eyes at this wondrous text. They are going to look at their own lives in a new way. Immediately they are going to see that some things about their culture are very troublesome and wrong. Other things aren’t going to conflict at all. When a westerner walks into this village, his is going to be shocked maybe, because the way people have ordered their lives around the bible doesn’t look anything like it does back home.

Or maybe take another easier example. When Matt and I came to Good Shepherd, the bibles lying around in there were covered with dust. So we blew that off and helped everyone to start reading it. And we just read it relentlessly. Without stopping. Even when everyone was complaining about it. And, blessing upon blessing, we didn’t know anything about the Danvers Statement. Sure, the relationships between men and women were broken, but that wasn’t the main problem. The problem is that the men and women need to know Jesus. They have to come to the scripture with eyes open and hearts aflame. And when they do, God sorts it out. He really does. Sometimes it looks very traditional. Sometimes it looks a little more unconventional. But if it doesn’t conflict with the words of the scripture, then it’s not worth fussing over.

The thing about the doctrinal truths in the Danvers Statement is that, when they are encountered in the woven tapestry of scripture, they are pretty glorious. For heaven’s sake, marriage is a reflection of God’s own nature. Women get glimpses of the incarnation every time they lumber around pregnant. The sacrifice of a husband for his wife catches them both up into the very cross itself. And submission! What a tragic loss of a word! Without submission we cannot understand Jesus himself. We just cannot. But these glories need to be preached. Not in a new way, but in a first way, in the course of a systematic working through the scriptures, for a broken and lost generation who haven’t really heard them.

And I’m pretty sure that, when they are heard, and internalized, and clung to, we’re not going to end up with the same picture we had before. I’m not, for example, not going to keep my four daughters home from college, because of Biblical Womanhood. But neither am I allowing my two sons to flee from the drudgery of a female dominated world. It’s more than possible, as my children grow up and go out into the world, that they won’t feel very comfortable anywhere. But they will know the gospel, may God be merciful, and they will know their own humanness and the humanness of others. And they may be able to think it through and make biblically discerned choices.

In a moment when it’s possible that half of the country will go out and vote for Trump, I think we need most desperately to go all the way back to our starting point, the single moment when God broke into time to redeem a lost and broken world, and not go past that until we have more surely understood what kind of God he is, and what kind of people we are.

Previous Post

February 29, 2016

Reading the Danvers Statement

Next Post

March 2, 2016 In Which I Explain About Trump to my Children

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category books Catechesis of the Good Shepherd Children in Conversation culture watch Daily Devotions Demotivations with Anne faith alone for the grandparents GAFCON In conversation with children In the News Kitchen Notes Lambeth Learning Notes Life Going On Men are Human Notes from Home Pictures Reading the Bible Saturday Links Sermons Signs of the Apocalypse The Bad Word Association The Prayer of Jonah Travel Notes Uncategorized Witless Wednesdays Work and the Christian

Select a Month June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the devil tempt Jesus to turn into bread?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Wood Sand Fish Stones

Books by This Author Books by Anne Kennedy

See All Titles »