Biblical Womanhood That Wasn’t

Last updated on: November 3, 2015 at 8:51 am by Anne Kennedy

Biblical Womanhood That Wasn’t 2015-11-03T08:51:17-04:00 Anne Kennedy

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was recently able to acquire for myself a copy of Rachel Held Evans’ A Year of Biblical Womanhood. I haven’t had time to really get into it, other than to note, at the outset, that she is a good, funny, writer, and that, though her premise is utterly flawed, I feel sympathetic and sorry for her, about her church experience.

In fact, based on her introduction alone, I think a great mounting defense can be made for what I’ve been complaining about lo these many months–the church in the west is in crisis, evangelicalism in particular. Her plan to take all the commands of the bible regarding women literally for one year, in order, essentially, to mock and undermine that same bible, is illustrative of the utter failure of Gospel Preaching in America over the last fifty years. And by failure I mean that it wasn’t tried. It wasn’t that everyone tried it and it failed. It’s that it wasn’t tried. Sure, almost every sermon in every church has a Come to Jesus moment, but the deep, full throated, painstaking exposition of the gospel through the scripture was not undertaken. Everyone thought it was, but in truth, there was a subtle shift off of the scripture and on to the individual’s behavior and feelings about the scripture. Instead of going carefully through the book of John, for example, John would be used to gather principles for “godly living”.

I know this because I lived through it. It was the bread and butter of my childhood. Either I was in the episcopal church hearing ten minute charming poetical reflections on the bible lessons printed in the bulletin, or I was at school listening to 45 minute “biblical” preaching. The length isn’t the issue. Neither kind of preacher would have thought the other was doing anything useful. But neither did either of them really exposit the text. The nondenom/baptistish preacher opens up the bible, tries to understand what is being said, considers his people and what he thinks they should be like, and then makes between three and ten action points of stuff his people should do or understand in order to be better. At least the episcopalian usually had no actionable guilt. Sure, we should all be worried about AIDS but the most anybody can do is feel guilty and send money. Later, when the check is in the mail, you can feel the warm glow of your personal concern about the prevailing issues of the day. Whereas the evangelical can get all tangled up in the labyrinth of applying the scripture as an instrument that gets people to be less awful. Understanding the bible becomes a means to the end of you being a better, more loving, more joyful, more godly person.

The most gentle, lovely, kind, believing pastors who wanted their people to be saved more than anything, nevertheless did not trust the scripture to do that work. The bible wasn’t splayed open into the hands of the ordinary person. It was mediated and doled out carefully as a tool of self actualizing discipleship on the road to personal holiness. So of course Ms. Evans didn’t ever learn what it was for. She didn’t meet Jesus. She didn’t hear the fullness of the gospel. Rather, the bizarre and seemingly contradictory commands of the Old Testament, having been wrenched out of their own context of scripture, could be easily delivered into her hands to do with what she liked.

In this way of preaching, the concept of biblical womanhood necessarily becomes incomprehensible. All the time I’m trying to help women of all ages who are confused and worried about what the bible says about women. They know it says something, but they don’t have a comprehensive understanding of how to read the bible at all and so they read other popular books about submission, and sex, and Proverbs 31, trusting the author to rightly interpret the scripture. This leads to ordinary women, who should be able to read the bible for themselves, but who don’t know how, to impose unnatural and ill fitting behaviors–that they’ve been led to believe are from the bible–onto their own marriages. Those are the women who have heard the gospel and do love God. The women who haven’t heard the gospel and have no love of Jesus, of course they either obviously undermine, or utterly reject it. Why would they do anything else?

I look forward to getting out of the introduction and into the body of the text, and her experiment. I expect the book will be fun to read. I can see why she’s so popular.

Previous Post

November 2, 2015

Weekend Bits

Next Post

November 4, 2015 Sure, Let's Ditch Masculinity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category books Catechesis of the Good Shepherd Children in Conversation culture watch Daily Devotions Demotivations with Anne faith alone for the grandparents GAFCON In conversation with children In the News Kitchen Notes Lambeth Learning Notes Life Going On Men are Human Notes from Home Pictures Reading the Bible Saturday Links Sermons Signs of the Apocalypse The Bad Word Association The Prayer of Jonah Travel Notes Uncategorized Witless Wednesdays Work and the Christian

Select a Month June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 July 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jericho" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fragrant Stronghold High Place Holy City

Books by This Author Books by Anne Kennedy

See All Titles »