Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Pop Theology

Home
Progressive Christian
Religious Music & Entertainment
Is the Soul Gendered?

Is the Soul Gendered?

Last updated on: June 30, 2015 at 11:19 am by Richard Lindsay

Is the Soul Gendered? 2015-06-30T11:19:42-07:00 Richard Lindsay

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve noticed recently that when you post an article on Facebook, the all-knowing Newsfeed will post three articles below your post – two that agree with the article you posted and one that disagrees. This is an interesting idea, and may help break down the “echo chamber” that so much of our online dialogue has become.

But then, sometimes, the articles Big Brother Facebook suggests are just downright offensive.

Looking over some postings on the remarkable coming out of Caitlyn Jenner the other day, I was struck by the serving up of a “third article” with the title, “Calling Bruce Jenner a Woman Is an Insult to Women.” I shouldn’t have clicked. After all, clicks to websites like this only up the ad count, making them more money. But, just as the human tendency when you see car wreck is not to turn away but to look more closely, I had to see this for myself.

I won’t tell you the name of the Web site, because I don’t want to up its audience, but let’s just say all the banner ads were for guns. The writer was a young blogger named Matt Walsh (not the Matt Walsh of the HBO comedy Veep.) I won’t repeat all the offensive things this particular Matt Walsh wrote about Caitlyn Jenner, but there was one line that absolutely intrigued me:

“For my part, I agree that a man can never lay claim to womanhood. I also agree that there is such a thing as a female brain and a female soul — and by extension female emotions and female personalities and female characteristics — but the trouble is that female brains and souls are always contained securely in female bodies.”

At the risk of sounding like an old curmudgeon, Walsh is only about 27, so there are probably a lot of things he doesn’t understand about life. He clearly doesn’t understand much about gender, because there are lots of situations—even besides transsexualism*—in which female or male brains are not “contained securely” in female or male bodies. But what really struck me here was the idea of not just a female or male brain, but a female or male soul.

Is the soul gendered? Do the sexed biological parts assigned to us at birth, and/or the roles we play as men, women, or another gender actually represent some essence of who we are? If one believes that the soul is immortal, does this gendered essence go with us when we die?

I decided to do some more research on this, and soon I was descending down a rabbit hole of male religious leaders mansplaining gender to the rest of the world.

Russell Moore, who is now the chief culture warrior of the Southern Baptist Church actually started off well. “We are not machines, to be reprogrammed at will; we are creatures,” he said, denouncing “the ancient heresy of Gnosticism, with the idea that the ‘real’ self is separate from who one is as an embodied, material being.”

Hear, hear! Maybe these guys are starting to make some sense.

He then lost me by stating, “Our transgender neighbors experience real suffering … the answers the culture and the Sexual Revolution-Industrial Complex offer can’t relieve that suffering.”

Of all the things Caitlyn Jenner thought she was representing by coming out as a transwoman, I’ll be she didn’t think she was now the poster girl for the “Sexual Revolution-Industrial Complex.”

The National Catholic Bioethics Center, a right-wing think-tank on issues of religion and medicine had this to say, “A person is the unity of soul and body, and ‘soul’ should be understood not as an immaterial self, but as that which makes the body be what it is, namely, a human person.”

Yes! Exactly! We are not embodied souls, but ensouled bodies! The material is essential to who we are as human beings. This has all kinds of positive implications for the experiences of gay people, women, and trans people, who must listen to their bodies and discern truth that goes against the orthodox teaching of the Church.

Then, down the page:

“Just as there are geometrical givens in a geometrical proof, sexual identity is an ontological given.”

I get it, if only Caitlyn Jenner had been better at geometry, she wouldn’t have “become” transgender.

Next, I found the response of Salvatore Cordileone, Archbishop of San Francisco, who has been America’s leading Catholic voice against marriage equality. Predictably, he related all gender identities to marriage:

“It’s all the story of a marriage. God’s marriage covenant with Israel is fulfilled in the blood of Christ on the cross, establishing the new and eternal covenant between him, the bridegroom, and his bride, the church. This is because God has used marriage as the primary sacred sign of our relationship with him.”

So the “primary sacred sign” of the relationship to God is one in which priests can’t take part because they’re celibate, and the “Bride of Christ” can only be led by men. Got it.

He then went on to assert that changes in understanding of gender would lead to “child sacrifice, the worship of feminine deities, or the cult of priestesses.”

Next on Keeping up with the Kardashians: Caitlyn leads Kim and Khloe in the sacrifice of Kendall to their new deity Kris!

If none of these arguments sound convincing, it’s because the transcendental element of the human person is mysterious, and mystery doesn’t sit well with fundamentalists.

Tradition and scripture have given us all kinds of ways to look at the gendered soul.

For instance, along with the Church being thought of in feminine terms, part of the Medieval courtly love tradition thought of the soul as feminine, and Christ as a suitor who lures “her” into a kind of spiritual romance.

What the author’s soul looks like.

Carl Jung spoke in terms of an animus or inner personality in women which was masculine, and anima, or inner personality of men which was feminine. I personally have always thought my anima was a strong feminine figure who knows what she wants and doesn’t suffer fools gladly – sort of like Bea Arthur.

The Bible, particularly in the New Testament says all kinds of interesting things about gender. Contra the archbishop, Jesus make pretty clear that in the Kingdom of Heaven, people will neither marry nor be given in marriage. So what becomes of this “primary sacred sign” of our relationship with God?

And let’s not even get started on Galatians, where Paul says we may even transcend the various dualistic markers of identity, “neither Jew nor Greek , slave nor free, male nor female” in favor of a new identity in Christ.

What struck me as fascinating among these critics was the sudden interest in incarnation, and breaking down the longstanding Christian dualism between soul and body.

If only this sudden interest in the body represented a new incarnational theology. If only this was the beginning of seeing men’s bodies, women’s bodies, or trans bodies as having real spiritual value, not just as throbbing mounds of flesh with desires that lead us astray from the Truth. If only Christians saw Christ’s incarnation in the body of a woman not as a one-time-only union of body and spirit but as a revelation of the innate holiness of our bodies as theological instruments—that our bodies’ needs, desires, hurts, illnesses, abilities and disabilities may point us to a greater understanding of God.

But that’s not what Moore, Walsh, and Cordileone think about Caitlyn Jenner’s body. They think her body makes her a freak. They are the ones that are delusional, because they think trans people are somehow “confused” about the relationships between their bodies, minds, and souls. They seem to think of Caitlyn Jenner’s coming out and gender transition as brain surgery—like putting a female brain in a man’s body, or putting a man’s brain into a female body. It never seems to occur to them that Jenner is more than aware of her own body’s needs. What our bodies tell us about being male, female, queer, trans, or any other gender identity deserves to be treated with respect, love, and perhaps even humility and awe as we discover the complex implications of being made in the image and likeness of God.

*Note: I use “transsexualism” here in its specific form to denote someone who goes through procedures like taking hormones or having gender confirmation surgeries so their body conforms physically to the gender they understand themselves to be. This is not to be understood as a “catch-all” term for trans people.

Pop Culture Events

Previous Post

June 16, 2015

KILLER SERIALS: Orange is the New Black, Season 3, Eps. 1-3

Next Post

June 22, 2015 True Detective, "The Western Book of the Dead" Post Mortem

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Classics DVD Film Music News Pop Culture Events Print Sports Television Uncategorized Video Games

Select a Month March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many years did it take Solomon to build his palace?

Select your answer to see how you score.

13 years 10 years 15 years 7 years