Not So Wild Things

Last updated on: November 13, 2009 at 10:31 am by J. Ryan Parker

Not So Wild Things 2009-11-13T10:31:51-08:00 J. Ryan Parker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Getting into the mind of a 12-year-old boy is no easy task. Crafting that internal world into a film is even more difficult…I would imagine. Maurice Sendak did it effectively enough in his book, Where the Wild Things Are, a fantastic tale untainted by the ravages of internal or external dialogue. The book’s ten or so sentences probably helped make it my favorite book to “read” as a child. The danger of watching the film adaptation of the book is comparison. It has been a while since I re-read the book, so I felt somewhat fresh in watching Spike Jonze‘s film recently. It’s safe to say that the film fails first as a film, and then, inevitably, as an adaptation.

By now, everyone should be familiar with the story of Sendak’s book. Max throws a fit and is sent to bed without supper where he promptly envisions a land of Wild Things, large, hairy animal-monster hybrids, with whom he undertakes a wild rumpus. In Jonze’s film, Max (Max Records) still throws a fit, embarrassing his mother (Catherine Keener) in front of her boyfriend (Mark Ruffalo). After he bites her, he storms out of the house and runs into the world of the Wild Things. Here we begin to long for Sendak’s silence. In Jonze’s film, the Wild Things constantly murmur to one another or themselves about the necessity of a leader. They are either fearful, self-loathing, or socially inept.

The necessary change from picture book to film is a notable challenge, but the result is an extreme bore. While the Wild Things’ dialogue represents the thought processes and emotional development of a young child, it makes the film an extreme bore, taking away from any sense of fun that the rumpus attempts to imbue in the film. Moreover, the rumpus itself is wildly violent, with Max escaping Wile E. Coyote-style from any permanent bodily harm. Woe to parents who have to endure playdates among children who have seen this rumpus…hopefully they won’t try to rip each other’s arms off! As a result, the film has no, or very little, air of “carefreeness” about it that often characterizes much of childhood. In the real world, Max does not endure significant trauma that might lead to the frequently darker imagination that plays out on the screen.

The highpoint of Where the Wild Things Are is definitely the art design and the Wild Things themselves. The costumes are simply amazing and demand appreciation for the actors who endured, no doubt, oppressive conditions and the technicians who operated the faces. The choice of voice acting for the Wild Things is especially interesting with performances by James Gandolfini, Chris Cooper, Forest Whitaker, and Catherine O’Hara. Many of the sets, especially their fort under construction, are quite impressive.

At the end of the day (and Max’s dream), perhaps Where the Wild Things Are might persuade us to take (our) children more seriously. However, most of us already know that children aren’t dumb, but we also know that many of them certainly have a better imagination than this.

Film

Previous Post

November 12, 2009

Screening Violence: A Review

Next Post

November 16, 2009 V: A Review

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Classics DVD Film Music News Pop Culture Events Print Sports Television Uncategorized Video Games

Select a Month March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which city did Paul describe as "a city filled with idols"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rome Athens Corinth Jerusalem