Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Pop Theology

There Will Be Blood, But No Revelations…

Last updated on: January 21, 2008 at 10:27 am   by J. Ryan Parker

There Will Be Blood, But No Revelations… 2008-01-21T10:27:51-08:00 J. Ryan Parker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

large_blood1.JPGP.T. Anderson’s (Boogie Nights, Magnolia) latest film, There Will Be Blood, opened to mixed, though mainly positive, reviews. A fan of his earlier works, I highly anticipated this film, thanks in no small part to the casting of Daniel Day-Lewis in the lead role as Daniel Plainview, an aspiring oil baron in 1800s western America. As expected, Day-Lewis gave yet another breath-taking performance. I was also intrigued by the other lead character, Eli sunday (a vocal Paul Dano as opposed to his mute role in last year’s wildly successful Little Miss Sunshine). I thought the interaction between Dano’s charismatic Pentecostal preacher, healer, seer and Day-Lewis’ brooding, gritty, foul-mouthed prospector would be the stuff of cinematic legend. There can be no mistaking the power of the scenes they share; however, where Anderson could have taken one more step in his portrayal of religion (taking Dano’s character seriously, perhaps), he seemed ot rest on these performances and not necessarily would they could have signified.

There Will Be Blood tells the story of Daniel Plainview, a tough-as-nails silver miner cum oil tycoon and his journey to both opulent wealth and spiritual/emotional/familial ruin. The film opens with a seven minute silent scene in which the only sounds are Plainview chipping away at a silver mine. Here, we see just how tough Plainview really is as he mines alone, falls down the shaft, and manages to climb back out with a broken leg. This is a man not to be toyed with. Several years pass by, and he, along with a few employees, have begun drilling for oil. Plainview exhibits not only the technical acumen for this work but an apparent sixth sense to detect the oil’s whereabouts. His reputation  obviously precedes him as a young man from southern California, Paul Sunday (also played by Dano), enlists Plainview’s services to drill the oil at his parent’s ranch without their knowledge.

Plainview and his son, H.W. (Dillon Freasier in a fantastic first performance), under the guise of a hunting trip, survey the land and prove Paul’s claims. Paul’s family, specifically his brother Eli, try in vain to hamper Plainview’s progress. Eli, the pastor of the Church of the Third Revelation, sees an opportunity for his church to benefit financially and strikes at it. Plainview, ever the self-serving autocrat will not be cowed so easily. As the film progresses, it is punctuated by Plainview and Sunday’s interactions. Time passes and Sunday leaves for a mission. Plainview’s wealth increases, and he settles into drunken old age on a newly built estate where he takes target practice on his possessions. Sunday returns, hat in hand, to beg for the money (with interest) that Plainview had once promised him. Bitter, drunk, and alone, Plainview will no longer tolerate what he believes to be Sunday’s schemes. In a film that feels like it loses its way on occasion, this ending grabs the viewer and refuses to let go in what is one of the most dramatic (if slightly burlesque) conclusions in recent cinema.

While Anderson gives us a visually beautiful film, we have seen some of this already in the Coen Brothers’ latest film, No Country For Old Men. There Will Be Blood is certainly more epic than this film; however, in reaching for a masterpiece, Anderson’s film becomes a little unwieldy. While Plainview is willing to abandon his only son in the pursuit of success, we do not need the presence of an imposter brother and his murder to prove that this oil man will not be thwarted. Like Citizen Kane (1941) and The Aviator (2004), There Will Be Blood proves once again that a quest for sole superiority in some field, accompanied with amassed wealth, without spiritual, emotional, or humanitarian drives are ruinous. But is this really anything new? Cue Eli Sunday.

Unfortunately, this evangelical minister does not differ greatly from his cinematic forebears either. The male, stationary version of a Florence Fallon (The Miracle Woman, 1931) or Sharon Falconer (Elmer Gantry, 1960) heals his burdened flock by casting out their illness-inducing demons with dramatic flair. However, we never reach solid footing with Sunday (and perhaps we are not supposed to). He reveals moments of deep contempt for and violence towards his father juxtaposed to gentle, sweet conversations with his flock. All of this seems to suggest an air of deceit for this type of minister, and given that Sunday is the only option in the film, perhaps all ministers. The conclusion which finds Sunday confessing to moral failures and financial trouble on the horizon only confirms what Anderson “forced” us to expect all along.

However, in the final, chaotic scene, as Plainview argues with Sunday, we might not hear Sunday plead with him, arguing that they are brothers…in fact the same person. Though Plainview may critique Sunday’s ways, he lives by no better moral, social, or ethical code, and in fact, lives according to a more harsh one…one that would have him abandon his son (temporarily and then ultimately) and murder an imposter brother who clearly poses no threat to him.

Anderson’s film is certainly amazing, due in most part to two Oscar-worthy performances; however, it tells us nothing new.  This flaw aside, the films is certainly worth experiencing.  As Mick LaSalle wrote, “Anyone who cares about the art of movies will eventually have to see, contend with and make a decision about “There Will Be Blood,” and that in itself constitutes a kind of recommendation.”

There Will Be Blood (158 mins) is rated R for violence and is in theaters everywhere.

Follow the link, Conquering the West and Getting His Hands Dirty in the Process, to Mick LaSalle’s review, perhaps one of the most sound critiques of the film.

Film

Previous Post



January 9, 2008

An Extra Special Series...

Next Post



January 22, 2008 Takin' It To the Streets...


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Classics DVD Film Music News Pop Culture Events Print Sports Television Uncategorized Video Games

Select a Month March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Beersheba" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Valley of Water House of the King Well of the Oath Blessed Field

Related posts from Pop Theology

Progressive Christian

A GHOST STORY Trailer Release

Pop Theology

Progressive Christian

At SXSW2017: May It Last: A Portrait of...

Pop Theology

Progressive Christian

At SXSW2017: DISGRACED

Pop Theology

Progressive Christian

At SXSW 2017: "Untold Tales of Armistead Maupin"

Pop Theology

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube