Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Pop Theology

Towards a We Culture…

Last updated on: July 10, 2007 at 6:14 am   by J. Ryan Parker

Towards a We Culture… 2007-07-10T06:14:06-07:00 J. Ryan Parker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

sicko-poster-425.jpgFor his most recent film, Sicko, Michael Moore turns his skeptical, investigative eye towards the health care system in the United States. The result? Yet another film that poses the ever-strengthening question: is the United States really the greatest country in the world? For the religiously-minded viewer, we might again question just how “Christian” our nation really is. Either way, Moore has released another significant film and, I would argue, one of the most spiritually significant films of 2007.

In Sicko, Moore plays a decidedly more “passive” role in the interview process, and I use that phrase lightly. Rather than antagonizing politicians or shoving a microphone in the face of health insurance CEO’s, Moore lets the ugly reality speak for itself by interviewing everyday folks with nightmare stories of denied healthcare, with some cases even resulting in the death of a loved one or family member because of denied care. Of course, Moore cinematically aids these stories to his own manipulative ends, but we should all know this before buying our tickets…right?

Along with these homeland horror stories, Moore contrasts the United States healthcare system with that of England, France, Canada, and even Cuba, all of whom have socialized medical care. To put it bluntly, all services are free regardless of a person’s insurance status. In the case of England and France, not only is healthcare guaranteed, wholistic care is provided as well in the form of lengthy paid vacations, (pa)maternity leave, unlimited sick days, and, in France, the opportunity to have a government-sponsored nanny to help out around the house of a family with a newborn.

These comparisons could be evidence enough that something is amiss in our homeland healthcare, and indeed, they are not too far off the mark. However, we must approach a Michael Moore film with the same amount of skepticism that he approaches these issues. While I certainly do not want to downplay the seriousness of the cases that he relays or the evil with which most HMO’s conduct their business, Moore obviously ignores the numerous (potentially countless) cases in which people receive adequate care. Moreover, he also ignores the troubles of socialized medicine that do exist (my wife who served as a Pediatric Intensive Care Nurse in England and now here in the US has interesting things to say about the pros and cons of each). One glaring absence in the continuity of his international medical visits is his failure to ask a Cuban doctor what his take-home salary is each month.

Surprisingly perhaps, Sicko is one of the most spiritually significant films of 2007 and certainly one that social-justice minded Christians should not miss. The benefits of socialized medicine are clearly evident, but the reasoning behind national healthcare, espoused by Canadian, British, French, and Cuban doctors, patients, and politicians clearly echoes Jesus’ commandment to care for “the least of these.” While I could go on for pages recounting memorable quotes, I only want to offer a few here.

First, while in England, Moore interviewed former old labour MP Tony Benn (who I had the privilege of having lunch with while serving at Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church in London). Benn is a socialist and proud of it. His comments on government in general are powerful, and his thoughts on government control through fear and hoplessness are especially pertinent to our situation in the United States. When Moore pressures him on the “capitalist” emphasis on choice, Benn bites back, “Choice means nothing if you don’t have the freedom to choose.” Perhaps Benn’s most memorable argument is that a government that can find enough money to kill people ought to find enough money to care for people.

Second, Moore’s contacts with Canadian and French patients and doctors reveal, in part, societies concerned with the least of these. The people that Moore interviewed clearly recognize that others might need a little extra help and that proper healthcare ought to be one of these areas assured to rich and poor alike. The confidence in humanity and decency is refreshing. One Canadian man hopes, “They’d do the same thing for me if they could.”

Finally, Moore’s interview with a British general practicioner sums up, for me, the heart of the matter. This doctor is married, has one child, and lives in a three bedroom townhouse in London (one of the most expensive cities in the world). The house seems more than comfortably apportioned, and he drives a newer model Audi. By all accounts, this man and his family seem to live a comfortable, happy, and healthy life. Moore presses him on his government-paid salary as a doctor for the National Health Service. He takes home around 80,000 pounds per year (roughly $150,000). He actually receives financial bonuses from the government if he provides successful care to his patients. These bonuses can push his salary well over 100,000 pounds per year. More astounding thatn this is his attitude towards life. “I am content. I am happy.” He continues, “I guess if you want a mansion and four cars then you can go work in another system, but I am happy with what I have.”

Herein lies the crux of the issue: contentment. Our capitalized society thrives on never having enough, and is perhaps epitomized by big corporations, HMO’s chief among them, who seek greater profit year on year. It would be great if this profit were put to use for the greater good, but sadly, this is not the case. Moore comments in the film that we need to stop living in a “me culture” and start living in a “we culture.” It would be ridiculous to think that Canda, England, France, and Cuba are utopias that have it all figured out. My wife can attest to medical “shortcomings” in the UK, I have a close friend who has much to say about social ills in Cuba, and we all are well aware of religious/racial issues in France. However, at least in terms of healthcare, one of the most important social justice issues of our time, these countries truly are working towards “we cultures.”

Film

Previous Post



July 9, 2007

Real-world Redemption...

Next Post



July 10, 2007 Tony Benn


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Classics DVD Film Music News Pop Culture Events Print Sports Television Uncategorized Video Games

Select a Month March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the shortest chapter in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 150 Psalm 117 Psalm 1 Psalm 100

Related posts from Pop Theology

Progressive Christian

A GHOST STORY Trailer Release

Pop Theology

Progressive Christian

At SXSW2017: May It Last: A Portrait of...

Pop Theology

Progressive Christian

At SXSW2017: DISGRACED

Pop Theology

Progressive Christian

At SXSW 2017: "Untold Tales of Armistead Maupin"

Pop Theology

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube