BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
Pop Feminist
- Home
- Catholic
- Religious Music & Entertainment
- And Lo! I Beheld The CATS
And Lo! I Beheld The CATS
Last updated on: December 22, 2019 at 8:51 pm by Emily C. A. Snyder
And Lo! I Beheld The CATS 2019-12-22T20:51:49-05:00 Emily C. A. Snyder
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have seen the Cats.
I have seen all of them.
I have seen them with such incredibly poor CGI that even this nephophyte was like: “Wait, do these cats have hands now?” and “Did someone CGI with the Windows Paint feature, to give Rebel Wilson a collar?”
I have seen them with human faces that floated over their cat ears like a fever dream that would disturb Salvadore Dali and give Hieronymus Bosch a wet dream.
I have seen, seen too, some glorious dancing that the cinematographer managed to cinematograph by accident, while he was walking around a CGI set, hungover from the night before, with cinematograph in unsteady hand.
I have heard – oh, have I heard – Taylor Swift attempt to sing in a sea of legit professionals.
And I have gloried in La Dench serenely above it all, while Sir Ian McKellan commits to the hellscape he signed up for by snarling like a snagglepuss before destroying a saucer of milk.
I have witnessed the embarrassing decline of Idris Elba as he proved that just because you’re jacked doesn’t mean you can dance.
And I have recoiled as Rebel Wilson kept unzipping her own skin, and then eating human-faced cockroaches, while training children-faced mice. And lo, I wondered if I should call child services.
And I have been in pain for James Corden, who does what he can with – essentially – one big fat joke. Which he’s far better than.
I have waited for Jennifer Hudson’s glory note in “Memory” and not been disappointed…although apparently she, too, does not know the meaning of happiness. Since this was the most disappointed triumph I’ve ever witnessed. Also: we did not need CGI snot.
I have looked up Robbie Fairchild who plays Munkustrap and is, frankly, the best thing about this entire movie. And that man can get it. And can sing, and dance, and do that Russian ballet thing where you launch yourself through the air and then land on your knee and look amazing and not like you just busted your kneecap.
I have remembered just how glorious some of the score is, particularly the chromatic rise in “Old Deuteronomy.” As well as how silly some of the score is, such as all the leftover 70’s funk in the “Rum Tum Tugger” and “Shimbleshanks the Railway Cat.”
Speaking of Shimbleshanks, I have gloried in his tapdancing. And then lamented that, once again, Tom Hooper has no effing idea how to bloody film a musical, and so we’ve got enormously wide shots where amazing choreography is happening and I can’t see it because the dancers take up 1/10th of the screen and WTF are you DOING, TOM HOOPER??!?!?!?
I have mourned for Andy Blankenbuehler’s choreography which is almost edited out of existence, reminding one of the tone-deaf excesses of Moulin Rouge! without any of the fun. Which has been filmed so poorly that big dance numbers, such as “Mungojerrie and Rumpleteazer” (performed by two of the best cast members, Danny Collins and Naoimh Morgan respectively) would have been breathtaking if Tom Hooper or cinematographer Christopher Ross had not placed the camera in exactly the least dynamic place, and surrounded it by baby’s first CGI.
I have both been pleased by screenplay’s Lee Hall and Tom Hooper’s attempt to give this plotless musical a plot with some judicious dialogue, which therefore attempted to give meaning and context to every song (such as Laurie Davidson’s Magical – and apparently lovelorn? – Mr. Mistoffolees). One of my major beefs with Andrew Lloyd Webber’s original Cats is that there is no plot. So I appreciate the attempt. But, to therefore let James Corden and Rebel Wilson just do their schtick while Ian McKellan spits and growls and Dame Judi Dench is forced to try to make the ending something about: “Ah, now you are a Jellicle cat” – aka a homeless alley cat? – be somehow triumphant? Juuuuust weird.
In fact, one of the strangest things about this movie is that each vignette seemed to be completely at the mercy of the main singer. When Taylor Swift butchers one of the best songs in the show (“Macavity”), the screen becomes yet another one of her self-indulgent music videos. While clearly, Ian McKellan was like: “Look, I’ve worked on the text of ‘Gus, The Theatre Cat.’ Just keep the camera on me. No, I’m not moving, you jerk. Look, I’ll hiss and inbetween give T. S. Eliot some Shakespeare.”
The movie also delights in fat shaming, which nobody needs. (C’mon Rebel Wilson and James Corden! You’re better than that!) I rewatched the stage version of the “Gumby Cat” just to see if I’d perhaps forgotten an anti-fat theme through the original – but no. Tom Hooper just thinks it’s hilarious to make all people with fat (except La Dench) be clumsy, overeating oafs. Right. Way to go, sir.
Also, yes, it’s as brain-searingly weird as everyone says to see Idris Elba, Jennifer Hudson and Judi Dench wear…cat fur? Dead cats? As clothes? What is happening? What genocide preceded the movie? What happened to the dead cats you’re wearing and trailing behind you?
Edited to add: several reviewers are also horrified with the sheer sensuality of the cats in question. It’s worth looking up any review that compares this movie to the fetish of Furries…except that the objection is about 40 years too late. Rewatch the original stage show to see a massive amount of uncomfortable and very specific kink. However, how this manifested for Hooper & Co. was that:
1) Sometimes the cats got really close to each other, with their human mouths and cat everything else, and I, an audience member, would sort of recoil and go: “Are they going to kiss? That seems weird.” At which point said cats would not kiss, but kind of apologetically nuzzle each other’s heads…with their human heads, and CGI cat ears…and somehow that was worse?
(Sole exception to this. I would 100% watch an entire movie of La Dench’s Old Deuteronomy and her Russian Ballet Dancing Lieutenant Cat, Munkustrap. Like, give me that buddy cat movie. I would watch the hell outta it.)
2) To conclude the uncanny valley of cat-people: Sometimes the actors tried to do this weird shoulder shimmy that was supposed to mean: “Don’t worry about me in a skintight spandex with bad CGI. I am, in fact, a cat.” And sometimes they were simply people without a shoulder shimmy, and a whole hella lotta bad CGI.
I kept thinking: why isn’t this animated?
The best way I can sum up this movie is this:
Upon leaving, I was asked to take a survey.
In asking about the quality of the film, I answered: “Poor.”
And then also answered: “It was exactly what I expected.”
Photo courtesy of Universal Films.
Previous Post

June 5, 2019
Plotting Surprises: Or How To Ruin Great Shows
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category #MeToo Art Catholic Artists Catholicism Culture Dating Definitions Fairy Tales Irish Jewish Literature Love & Marriage Meditation Movies Musicals Poetry Pop Feminist Psychology Shakespeare Social Media Story structure Theatre TV Uncategorized Verse Drama Well-Meaning Patriarchy
Select a Month December 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
Who was the king that the angel of the Lord struck because he did not give God glory, but received the worship of the people, and who was eaten by worms?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Haddam Herod Saul Hezekiah
Support this
Column

Related posts from Pop Feminist
Plotting Surprises: Or How To Ruin Great Shows
With Great Storytelling Comes Great Responsibility - Spider-Man:...
The Good, the Bad, and the Baffling of...
Graves & Grace: On the Burning of Notre...
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
Halloween, Tolkien, And The Victory of Grace
If I had to choose a favorite month of the year, it...
Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology
As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...
The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...
One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...
Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon
Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...
5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes
Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...
Credo: A Story of God Told with the...
About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...
view all Catholic blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In











