Should The Church Be In The Marrying Business?

Last updated on: July 9, 2013 at 10:39 am by Michelle Van Loon

Should The Church Be In The Marrying Business? 2013-07-09T10:39:42-05:00 Michelle Van Loon

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I really wish the Church would rethink her role in the marriage business in this country.

(And yes, I chose the word “business” on purpose.)

In light of the June 26 Supreme Court rulings about the Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8 in California, a few more voices joined the small choir of those who suggest that the civil/contractual nature of a marriage partnership is a different matter than that of a spiritual covenant made between two people in the context of their faith community. (Click here and here to hear from a couple of soloists in the choir of those endorsing some form of this idea.) A number of countries have civil marriage on their books.

Fewer weddings each year are performed by the couple’s pastor – or any pastor. Though organizations like this one exist in order to connect a couple who aren’t members of a church with a believing pastor licensed to perform a marriage ceremony, an increasing number of people have their favorite aunt or frat bro get ordained via an internet-based “denomination” that exists solely to create legal officiants for the purposes of performing a ceremony and signing a wedding certificate. Most of these officiants perform a single wedding for their pals. Other couples head to a courthouse or hire themselves a justice of the peace for the day of their wedding.

In light of the fact that it is as easy as clicking a PayPal button to become a licensed minister, there is no small irony in the fact that some congregations and denominations make the road to ordination a long and challenging one. After my husband graduated from seminary in 2007, he became a volunteer police chaplain for a department in a nearby town. He approached the pastor of the congregation we attended to see if he could begin the process to become licensed or ordained within the small denomination of which the church was a part so he might be able to perform a wedding for one of the officers if he was asked. “If you’re planning on planting a church, we can work toward licensing you,” he was told. “But we don’t have a licensing or ordination process in place for chaplains.” Bill could have gone the mail-order route if necessary, but he valued both his education and the process of being recognized by and accountable to a church body/denomination. In the end, a PayPal Pastorate was not a viable option for him.

It turns out the word “process” used by the pastor cemented for me why a wedding – a covenant event – in the context of a church community is a very different entity than the legal and civil contract into which two parties enter on the day of the marriage. The process by which an individual becomes licensed or ordained is a function of the particular community of faith. The individual does not ordain him or herself. Couples who want to be married within that community are, at least in theory, choosing to submit themselves to that community, just as their officiant has elected to do. A wedding is an event, but marriage is a process. Faith, not particular government’s rules, is the foundation for a church’s function in the blessing of a union. Even churches that do not hold marriage as a sacrament recognize that their function in blessing a marriage has spiritual and moral dimensions far beyond the execution of a legal contract.

Which brings me back to the word “business”. State governments certify the legality of every marriage contract signed in this country, just as they do when a divorce ends that contract, and must be processed through the legal system in this country. A marriage partnership in the eyes of the government allows the parties involved certain legal benefits and responsibilities. The government does not and should not be involved beyond this point in our lives. If every couple begins with a civil ceremony – a contract-signing, perhaps with an optional giant reception to follow for those who forego a Church blessing ceremony – then the Church will be able to focus solely on who she is meant to be when it comes to marriage.

A Church-based matrimony blessing ceremony wouldn’t be any different than what a church wedding is like today, save for the current scramble after the ceremony to make sure that the wedding certificate is properly (legally) witnessed and signed. Couples who elect to have a Church-based sacred ceremony are acknowledging that there is something more than law at work in their marriage. The author of Ecclesiastes wrote, “Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.” (Ecc. 4:12) A civil wedding contract allows two to defend themselves. For those of faith, a marriage within a church community is an acknowledgement that there is a third strand to their union.

Do you agree with this line of thinking? Am I missing something? Talk to me!

Ecclesiology

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 5, 2013

Summer Reading Snapshots: What Are YOU Reading?

Next Post

July 11, 2013 The First Church Of The Good Ol' Days

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Baggage Books Calendar Church and Ministry CVID Ecclesiology Everyday Christian life Faith Falling Upward From The Margins Housing Jesus Movement's Unintended Consequences Midlife Midlife Survey #1 Midlife Survey #2 Moments and Days Out To The Margins Pilgrim's Road Trip Regret Seminary Spiritual Formation Uncategorized What's A Nice Jewish Grandmother Like You Doing In Seminary? When The Heart Waits Writing

Select a Month June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet anointed both Saul and David as kings of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nathan Eli Gad Samuel