Falling Upward, Chapter 3

Last updated on: February 3, 2012 at 9:53 pm by Michelle Van Loon

Falling Upward, Chapter 3 2012-02-03T21:53:16-06:00 Michelle Van Loon

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m blogging through Richard Rohr’s Falling Upward: A Spirituality Through The Two Halves Of Life. Even if you haven’t read the book, please stick around and join the conversation here if you’re facing a mid-life transition. Father Rohr offers us all some meaty food for thought.

Click here to read the introduction to the series.

Click here to read my post about Chapter 1.

Click here to read my post about Chapter 2.

* * * * * * *

Chapter 3 is entitled “The First Half of Life”. Father Rohr begins by tossing out a couple of statements:

1. Healthily conservative people tend to grow up more naturally and more happily than those who receive only free-form, “build it yourself” worldviews.

2. Without law in some form, and without butting up against that law, we cannot move forward easily and naturally. The rebellions of two-year-olds and teenagers are in our hardwiring, and we have to have something hard and half good to rebel against.

“You need to struggle with the rules more than a bit before you throw them out,” he writes. “You only internalize values by butting up against internal values for a while. All of this builds the strong self that can positively obey Jesus – and ‘die to itself’. In fact, far too many (especially women and disadvantaged people) have lived very warped and defeated lives because they tried to give up a self that was not there yet.”

Rohr is saying that the struggle against rules and authoritarian structures is good for us. A butterfly can not fly if it is helped as it fights to emerge from its chryssalis. It needs the struggle to work out its “butterfly muscles” so it can fly. He asserts the lives lived by many women and the disadvantaged can be attributed to the fact that they’ve surrendered their lives to others before they seized the opportunity to fight for their lives.

I think of a few women I’ve known: “model” Christian women; pastel perfection wrapped around a core of unexpressed anger. They were known as exemplars, but let another woman cross them or get in their way, and the claws (and truth) would come out. Perhaps they were fighting for themselves at the only level they could fight from the confines of their cocoon.

“Basically, if you stay in the protected first half of life beyond its natural period, you become a well-disguised narcissist or an adult infant (who is also a narcissist!) – both of whom are often thought to be ‘good old boys’ (or my add – gals) by the mainstream culture,” Rohr writes. Our first-half-of-life container is built out of traditions, symbols, respect for authority, rules, regulations and the approval of our “tribe”. He suggests that it is easier to break free of the structure in the second half of our lives if the first half is constructed of conservative/traditional building materials.

“People who have never allowed themselves to fall are actually off balance, while not realizing it at all.”

On the other hand, the rules hold us and allow us to grow up, building discipline, promptness, persistence and a healthy self-image. But there are few who’ve experienced this in a healthy way. Containers made from the ideologies of “communism, fascism, terrorism, unfettered capitalism (yes, Wall Street is also am embodiment of our ideology!)” are poor substitutes for the kinds of containers created by healthy families, churches and communities. Rohr notes, “None of these ‘isms’ ever create a ‘civilization of love'”.

The kind of love to which he refers is both unconditional love and very conditional love. Though we cherish the idea of pure unconditional love, we need conditional love (in the form of laws, rules and limits) as well. Think here of the Apostle Paul’s statement about what he learned as he ran head-first into the container of the Law: “I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, ‘You shall not covet.'” (Rom. 7:7)

Our rapidly-changing post-modern world leaves many searching for the sanctuary of a container. “Men join a male club, like the church, to get the male energy they never got as sons, or because they accept the male game of ‘free enterprise’ and social advancement.” No wonder some of these leaders are so invested in control of their fiefdoms. “Many fall in love with their first place and position, as an extension of themselves, and spend their whole lives building a white picket fence around it.”

The final section of the chapter talked about discovering ‘authentic inner authority’. It takes a guide, a soul friend or a stumbling block to guide us beyond being a loyal first-half soldier. “You will have many more Aarons building you golden calves than Moseses leading you on any exodus.” Discharging our “loyal soldier” means that we will become soul drawn in the second half instead of the ego-drivenness that defines the first half of our lives.

Those who are in mid-life transition, I have a couple of questions for you: In what ways have you seen your relationship with rules change? Does Fr. Rohr’s explanation of the purpose and role of rules in the first half make sense to you? Why or why not?

Falling Upward

Previous Post

January 24, 2012

Falling Upward, Chapter 2

Next Post

February 5, 2012 Parents, you can not predict the future. You know that, right?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Baggage Books Calendar Church and Ministry CVID Ecclesiology Everyday Christian life Faith Falling Upward From The Margins Housing Jesus Movement's Unintended Consequences Midlife Midlife Survey #1 Midlife Survey #2 Moments and Days Out To The Margins Pilgrim's Road Trip Regret Seminary Spiritual Formation Uncategorized What's A Nice Jewish Grandmother Like You Doing In Seminary? When The Heart Waits Writing

Select a Month June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet was swallowed by a great fish?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elijah Jonah Moses Ezekiel