Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Pia de Solenni

President Obama’s Catholic Problem

Last updated on: April 29, 2009 at 6:31 am   by Pia de Solenni

President Obama’s Catholic Problem 2009-04-29T06:31:05-07:00 Pia de Solenni

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In case you’ve been asleep or blissfully unaware, we have a newsflash. President Obama has a Catholic problem.

You see, many Catholics voted for him ostensibly because of the economy. (Looking at the voter data, I don’t think there was really a record turnout. There were perhaps only a million more voters than the previous election. The Obama campaign did an excellent job of registering new voters – mostly young people and blacks. And he didn’t win with a landslide. I think he won because a group of voters, namely value voters, stayed home. But the majority of Catholics who voted went for Obama.)

When it came to more fundamental questions of abortion, human embryonic stem cell research, and other critical social values issues, conventional wisdom suggests that people were overwhelmed by the economy. But now it turns out that President Obama is the abortion rights champion that he promised the pro-abortion crowd he would be before the election. Yes, this was all public record. You can probably find the clips on YouTube.

The promises of change and a political climate in which there’s room for everyone disappeared the President’s third day in office when he revoked the Mexico City Policy which prohibited federal tax money from going to fund abortion in other countries. There was no discussion, no dialogue, no compromise, nothing. He later lifted the ban on federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research, announced plans to revoke the conscience protections that protect healthcare workers (including Catholics) from having to perform procedures that violate their conscience, like abortion, and he refused support for vouchers for low income children in DC that would give them access to quality private education like that which he can afford for his children and – oh, yes – that which is predominantly provided by Catholic schools. -All this in just the first sixty days of his administration.

Naturally, there was an outcry when he accepted the invitation to give the commencement address at Notre Dame this spring. (The outcry has more to do with the extension of the invitation rather than the acceptance of it.) His aggressive pursuit of policies which violate core values (held predominantly by Catholics) has given many people cause to be concerned.

For the President’s recent speech at Georgetown (where it appears no dialogue about these core issues took place), the President’s staff went so far as to request that the university cover/remove the “IHS” signs which refer to the person of Jesus Christ. Even worse, the university complied. (I can’t imagine a Jewish or Muslim institution doing the same, or even being requested to do the same.) CNS has a fairly in depth article complete with photos here.

So it’s really no surprise that the people that the administration has tentatively suggested for the role of ambassador to the Vatican have got the thumbs down from the Vatican. Catholic News Agency reports here on it. The problem? Well, it’s the Vatican’s standards. In its own words:

The Holy See has always set a very simple standard: the person [ambassador] should not be in opposition to fundamental teachings of the Church that belong to our common shared humanity. He or she may not believe in Catholic dogma if he or she is not a Catholic, but we could not accept someone who is in favor of abortion, or (human) cloning or same-sex unions equated to marriage.

Indeed, the President has a Catholic problem and it’s not just that he can’t find someone to fill an ambassador position. His tone of moderation and compromise means nothing when it comes to the values and beliefs of a significant portion of the US population and a significant portion of his voters. The only Catholics he has put forth in his administration are those who are also at odds with core teachings of the Catholic Church. His proposed revocation of the conscience protection regulations could effectively shut down the single largest healthcare provider in the US, an odd thing when he claims to want to expand healthcare access…

But Christians believe that God brings good even out of very bad situations. Perhaps some of the good that will come out of this is a renewed understanding of Catholic identity. We certainly need it.

In the meantime, the new administration could perhaps start to respect and engage US Catholics who, incidentally, are also supposed to be represented by the President.

Thinking Out Loud

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 27, 2009

A question for Fr. Jenkins

Next Post



May 1, 2009 Moderate rhetoric, hard-left policies.


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Articles Thinking Out Loud Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 September 2013 August 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 August 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 October 1008


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city is home to the headquarters of the Roman Catholic Church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jerusalem Vatican City Paris London

Related posts from Pia de Solenni

Catholic

Back soon...

Pia de Solenni

Catholic

Notre Dame & Its Catholic Identity

Pia de Solenni

Catholic

The octuplets: difficult situation. Bad law?

Pia de Solenni

Catholic

Reasonable Doubt

Pia de Solenni

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube