Let Benedict be Benedict

Last updated on: April 21, 2010 at 12:38 pm by Pia de Solenni

Let Benedict be Benedict 2010-04-21T12:38:19-07:00 Pia de Solenni

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s difficult to do communications for someone I don’t advise or even know. But over the past few weeks, I have been asked a lot of questions, on air and off, about the statements and actions made by some leaders in the Catholic Church regarding the sex abuse scandals.

Yet amid the confusion, it seems apparent to me that Pope Benedict has taken an unprecedented lead in handling the issue. He started in 2001 even before he was pope when he was head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and he became, in essence, the Vatican point person on all sex abuse cases. In assuming this role, he was not removing the responsibility from local bishops; but rather providing for a venue or format whereby the Vatican would be aware of each case. The immediate jurisdiction was and is still the local bishop’s.

In 2005, during his homily for the College of Cardinals gathered to elect a pope after the death of John Paul II, then-Cardinal Ratzinger presented several key themes. The first was the full weight of evil and how that is countered by Christ’s love. At the time, many were struck by the fact that he would even bring up the topic of evil in such a context. To my mind, it suggests that he understood all too well the challenges facing the Church both from within and without.

He also spoke of a “dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one’s own ego and desire.” This was first understood more in the context of intellectual matters. Nevertheless, it also speaks to the topic of evil and to the sex abuse scandals since persistent sin can also be described in the same way.

Yet, as Cardinal Ratzinger pointed out in the same homily, the remedy to both the problem of evil and the dictatorship of relativism is found in Christ, in our friendship with him and in our love for him. Not to be confused with trite sentimentalism, Ratzinger was talking about the life of every Christian: a life of going forth and bearing witness to Christ.

Make no doubt about it, this is particularly difficult given the challenges of the sex abuse scandals. But Ratzinger enunciated the Church’s vision of the priesthood: “We are priests in order to serve others. And we must bear fruit that will endure.”

Remember, this is the same man who was called the Pope’s Rottweiler, based on the assumption that his approach in matters of doctrine precluded any communication of tenderness.

But it was this man, as Pope Benedict, who in 2008 met with victims of sex abuse during his visit to the United States. In my last piece, I cited The Boston Globe’s reaction: “a dramatic move likely to alter forever the image of his pontificate.”

Despite the media’s short term memory, Benedict continued these meetings in Australia the same year, later in Rome when he met with some Canadian victims, and most recently in Malta this past weekend.

John Allen relates the reactions of two of the victims in a recent column. One said, “For a long time I haven’t gone to Mass, and I had lost the faith. Now I feel like a convinced Catholic again.” Another explained that he had now made his peace with the Catholic Church.

Every priest, whether a pastor, bishop, or pope, should have as his primary concern the salvation of souls. Pope Benedict’s actions show that he is working to bear the fruit he referenced in his homily for the cardinals: “[L]ove, knowledge, a gesture capable of touching hearts, words that open the soul to joy in the Lord.”

In his coverage of the Malta visit John Allen commented that the Vatican’s approach seemed to be “let Benedict be Benedict.” I couldn’t agree more.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 6, 2010

Penance for the Scandal

Next Post

May 5, 2010 A Necessary Conversation

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Articles Thinking Out Loud Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 September 2013 August 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 August 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 October 1008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the oldest person in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Adam Abraham Noah Methuselah