Fr. Lombardi’s Press Statement & Benedict’s Implicit Challenge

Last updated on: November 24, 2010 at 11:25 am by Pia de Solenni

Fr. Lombardi’s Press Statement & Benedict’s Implicit Challenge 2010-11-24T11:25:22-07:00 Pia de Solenni

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Dialogue in the world of Don Camillo & Peppone

In case you’re interested in Fr. Lombardi’s formal statement from the press conference yesterday, here’s a link to the Italian text.

Specifically:

“Alla luce di questa visione ampia e profonda della sessualità umana e della sua problematica odierna, il Papa riafferma che “naturalmente la Chiesa non considera i profilattici come la soluzione autentica e morale” del problema dell’AIDS.

Con ciò il Papa non riforma o cambia l’insegnamento della Chiesa, ma lo riafferma mettendosi nella prospettiva del valore e della dignità della sessualità umana come espressione di amore e responsabilità.”

My unofficial translation:

“In light of this broad and profound vision of human sexuality and its challenges today, the Pope reaffirms that “naturally the the Church does not consider condoms as an authentic and moral solution” to the problem of AIDS.

With this, the Pope does not reform or change the teaching of the Church, but he reaffirms it, putting it in the perspective of the value and dignity of human sexuality as an expression of love and responsibility.”

Fr. Lombardi’s clarification yesterday was confusing. But journalists covering the press conference should have taken into account the actual text of the official statement, not to mention the text of the statement in the book. This discussion is much more subtle than the way it’s represented in headlines. But it also points to what I think is a huge challenge from the Pope.

Disclaimer: I’m a fan of Light of the World and I think it’s a great work, full of potential for many continuing conversations, not just about condoms. Some thoughts that struck me as I read the book:

1. The Pope knows that the world is deeply wounded and in need of healing. Division and conflict are familiar to everyone.

2. We’re not all going to agree with each other, or the Pope, on everything. But we still need to be able to get along peaceably.

3. The model for resolving conflict is violence: physical, verbal, or otherwise. The back and forth of cable news or the internet frequently does not encourage dialogue. There’s no listening. Just people repeating what they think, which means no understanding.

4. Benedict doesn’t expect everyone to agree with him: “If there had been nothing but approval, I would have had to ask myself seriously whether I was really proclaiming the whole Gospel.”

5. As I previously wrote, the Regensburg address offers an example of the potential for constructive dialogue. After the initial tragic fallout, one of the most – if not the most – substantive dialogues with Islam has ensued. This concept of dialogue, from my perspective, indicates a unique characteristic of Benedict, one which has the potential to yield great results.

But this is where the challenge lies. Are we ready to have a rational conversation, starting with listening, or will we settle for the noxious back and forth that doesn’t represent the truth of anything that’s being said?

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 23, 2010

Condoms. A Lesser Evil?

Next Post

December 21, 2010 The First Advent: Preparing to be Parents

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Articles Thinking Out Loud Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 September 2013 August 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 August 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 October 1008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet's wife died as a sign to Israel, and he was told not to mourn?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amos Daniel Obadiah Ezekiel