Recommended Reading: Objectification isn’t About Sex

Last updated on: July 3, 2014 at 11:27 am by Sierra Phoenix

Recommended Reading: Objectification isn’t About Sex 2014-07-03T11:27:04-04:00 Sierra Phoenix

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I find it really interesting that my daily read through the blogosphere today brought up two apparently unrelated articles that echo each other. They use different examples and are written in noticeably different styles, but they nonetheless bring up the same issue and even the exact same description of the problem (bolding is mine). Both are worth a look. Enjoy!

Jolene Tan at The F Word (UK) writes:

What’s wrong with sexual objectification? Hint: it’s not the “sexual” bit

“Objectification” is not a synonym for “attraction”. It refers to treating someone as an object, less than fully human, a means to an end, rather than as a person. Suggesting that sexually objectifying men might “empower women”, or otherwise further the cause of gender equality, seems to me to (perhaps wilfully) misunderstand objectification.

Following the recent delivery of my first child, I’ve become aware of how children can be objectified even as newborns. You might think all adult interaction with a few-weeks-old infant, completely incapable of language, necessarily involves an interpolation of the adults’ interpretations and motivations, so that it’s hard to speak of levels of respect for the baby as an individual person. But conduct I’ve witnessed has shown me otherwise. We might not be able to obtain verbal confirmation of a baby’s wishes, but there’s a difference between making an educated guess, based on behavioural cues, that zie is seeking cuddling or feeding, and (for example) prodding or tickling hir or subjecting hir to noise because you, the adult, want to see open eyes or a smile. Regarding a baby as a toy for the entertainment of adults: again, objectification.

Ozy Frantz writes at No, Seriously, What About Teh Menz?:

On Objectification (NSFW)

Most important misunderstanding: objectification is not a synonym for attraction. Let me say that in shouty letters. OBJECTIFICATION IS NOT A SYNONYM FOR ATTRACTION. Feminists (at least, the sort I want to associate with) have nothing against attraction, not even the attraction of men for women. They’re against treating people like objects! A few moment’s reflection can see that those are two fundamentally different things.

For instance, consider a non-sexual example of objectification: the headless fatty phenomenon.

“Headless fatties” are used to illustrate articles about obesity. Instead of presenting fat people as a diverse group with a variety of reasons for being obese and a bunch of interests, personality traits, and desires that are entirely unrelated to their weight, headless fatty pictures erase the humanity of fat people and reduce them to a single thing– their number on a scale.

sexual objectification

Previous Post

July 1, 2012

Sexuality Project: Peer Group, Q. 2

Next Post

July 2, 2012 Survival Songs: Muse, Resistance

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion birth control chastity christian culture economy eschatology families fear feminism graduate school homeschooling islam LGBTQ issues love marriage media men modesty music patriarchy phoenix preaching quiverfull race sexuality project skirts-only submission Uncategorized william branham witnessing women

Select a Month July 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz