No Mandate from God on Immigration Reform

Last updated on: March 15, 2013 at 11:00 am by Timothy Dalrymple

No Mandate from God on Immigration Reform 2013-03-15T11:00:03-04:00 Timothy Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Recently Mark Tooley posted a piece I entitled “For Evangelicals, the Temptation of Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” in which he criticized a movement amongst evangelical leaders to endorse comprehensive immigration reform, however noble their intentions might be. Matthew Soerens, who focuses on immigration issues for World Relief, posted a response I entitled “Evangelical Support for Immigration Reform is Biblical, Not Political.” Quite a conversation ensued in the comments. Below is Mark Tooley’s response in turn to Soerens:

God, Immigration and the Vocation of the Church

By Mark Tooley

Matthew Soerens diligently responded to my column without really addressing my key questions as to the vocation and mandate of church leaders to aggressively push specific legislation to which scripture and church tradition don’t speak specifically and for which there is not consensus among their own memberships. He complains that most evangelical clergy don’t preach from the pulpit about immigration without considering that they prioritize the gospel over important but still subordinate political issues. He admits that the Bible doesn’t offer direct counsel on U.S. immigration policy but still seems to insist that its thrust can point in only one direction on this issue. He exclusively credits “population control” groups for repeatedly blocking the legislation he seeks without fully explaining why Congress should bend to such a narrow constituency. He cites business, labor, law enforcement and “most” Americans as supporting his goal, again without offering a political rationale for the continued resistance. He links the “population control” groups to abortion, and complains that one board member of my organization works for one such group.

That board member is actually a pro-life Anglican who previously spent years working for evangelical renewal and pro life advocacy in the United Methodist Church, whose officials are pro choice, pro population control, and also share Soerens’ political goal of legalizing illegal immigrants. By most accounts, pro-choice and pro-population-control philanthropies like the Ford Foundation and George Soros are heavily financing the push for mass legalization, exponentially outspending donors on the other side. Last year the National Association of Evangelicals, the parent group of Soerens’ group, was revealed to have received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the pro choice Hewlett Foundation. NAE’s longtime political spokesman Richard Cizik, who shares Soerens’ immigration views, publicly supported population control as part of his environmental agenda while still with NAE. Jim Wallis’ Sojourners, a prominent part of the evangelical immigration coalition, has received generous funding from Soros.

My own group has no official stance on immigration legislation. Our staff and board include different views. Where we are largely agreed, and what has motivated our work for 32 years, is a concern that the institutional church not confuse the Gospel with debatable political specifics. Ecclesial bodies, when addressing contemporary issues, are typically wiser to speak of broad principles rather than lobby for specific legislation, a vocation often better left to lay persons. There also needs to be discernment by church representatives about core Christian teachings versus questions of prudential judgment. And dogmatic church stances on civil legislation not supported by church members undermine credibility and integrity.

Soerens and his colleagues in church groups backing sweeping legislation that would offer mass legalization of illegals are undoubtedly sincere. But they would do better to perform their political advocacy independent of church institutions, backed and funded by supporters who unequivocally share their views. There could then be a vigorous debate in which people of faith hopefully would avoid the always constant temptation to claim God’s mandate for their politics.

Mark Tooley is President of the Institute on Religion and Democracy.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 13, 2013

If It Isn't Costly, It's Not Commitment - Tyler Wigg-Stevenson Interview, Part 2

Next Post

March 19, 2013 The Obama Justice Department's Disastrous Course on Religious Liberties

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abortion adoption Africa Aging AIDS America Worship American history Americolatry An Open Letter to a College Freshman animals Apologetics art Atheism Authors Barack Obama Bible Biblical Scholarship Billy Graham Blogging Bono Book Review Books That Change Lives Breakfast Links Bulletin Board Business Children Christian Approach to Politics Christian Media Christian Right Derangement Syndrome Christianity and Homosexuality Christians in Government Christmas Chuck Colson CLS v Martinez Comic Creation Creativity and the Arts Cross Examinations Cross Investigations Daily Fragment Daily Trinity Death debt Deep Thoughts on Fatherhood depression economy education Election 2012 entertainment Environment Epistemology Erik Campano Euthanasia Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Gays Everyday Transcendence evil evolution Facebook Jesus faith Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics faith and reason family Feminism foreign affairs Franklin Graham Future of Evangelicalism Galen D. gay marriage George W. Bush Guest Posts Guns Gymnastics Harold Camping Heaven Hell Holidays Hollywood Homosexuality iam2.org Illegal Immigration immigration Immigration Reform Injustice Inspiration Interviews Islam Jeremy Lin Jesus jesus christ John Mark Reynolds Johnnie Moore Judgment Day Just War Theory Killing Osama Link of the Day Lists of the Week Mark Goldblatt Marriage Military Missions Mitt Romney Modern Western Thought Monastic wisdom Mormonism Morning Hash Morning Report Motherhood Movies Obamacare Old Testament Orphan Care Palin Parenting Pastoral Resources Patheos Peace Between Religions PEPFAR Persecution Peter Wehner Peter Wehner Philosophy Political Quotes of the Day politics Politics and Economics Pornography Prejudice Prisoner Rape Question of the Week Race Radical Faith Rapture Ravi Zacharias Rick Santorum Russia Salvation Sarah Palin Scandals Science Science and Faith Separation of Church and State Series sex sex slavery social justice Social Justice Ministry Spiritual Disciplines sports Steven Tyler Suffering Suicide Sunday Funnies T. Dalrymple Tea Party Technology terrorism The Christian Media Files The Daily Trinity The Electorate The Ethics of Rhetoric The Future of Seminary Education The Middle East The Obama Presidency theological Theological Renewal Theology Uncategorized Understanding Evangelicalism Vocation war War and Peace With Distinction Word to the Wise Writers

Select a Month October 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz