Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Philosophical Fragments

Michelle Obama's Obesity Crusade: Coming Soon to a Church Near You?

Last updated on: June 22, 2011 at 11:28 am   by Timothy Dalrymple

Michelle Obama's Obesity Crusade: Coming Soon to a Church Near You? 2011-06-22T11:28:55-04:00 Timothy Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Michelle Obama has been appearing at churches, including evangelical churches, to speak on health, fitness and the dangers of obesity.  I recently heard from a member of North Point Church, Andy Stanley’s church in the northern suburbs of Atlanta, that Michelle Obama appeared there last February.  Meghan Clyne at the Weekly Standard wrote about it in April.

Michelle Obama goes to church.

The outreach is directed through the Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, which has come under criticism for pressing a more partisan agenda than the office had previously.  Where the Bush office largely sought to identify churches that were doing good work and resource them to accomplish shared objectives, placing religious and non-religious nonprofits on an equal footing in competing for federal dollars, the office under Obama has largely worked through its network of churches to rally grass-roots support for Obama administration initiatives, most notably the Obamacare reform.  I listened in on the ‘conference call with the President’ in which Obama, the Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, and others like Jim Wallis expressed the support of “the faith community” for Obama’s health care reform efforts, and encouraged pastors and religious leaders to mobilize support for the Obamacare bill.

Clyne finds a similar worry in this case.  While some portions of the “Let’s Move! Toolkit for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Organizations” are perfectly innocuous, like encouraging churches to host sports leagues for children, others are less so.  Clyne calls them “efforts to have congregations place themselves in the service of government as recruiters for the welfare state.”  The toolkit encourages congregations to help enroll individuals for food stamps, the “Summer Food Service Program,” breastfeeding and mother-support programs, and school meals.  The problem, Clyne says, is this: “rather than reducing the public’s dependence on government-run programs by empowering faith-based organizations, this White House seems to view churches, synagogues, and so on as tools to increase reliance on programs designed in Washington.”  In other words, rather than using government to empower churches to serve the needy, the Obama administration approach uses churches to help government serve the needy.  It encourages dependence on a far-off federal bureaucracy instead of on local organizations that are intimately involved in their communities.

Richard Land, one of the most prominent evangelical voices in the public policy sphere, has some choice words about the change in direction of the faith-based office.  “They’ve turned this on its head,” he says.  Rather than having “people who live in a zip code making the decisions about what are the best ways to alleviate the problem in that zip code,” as the office had done under Bush, the office in its present incarnation “tells you what your priorities should be.”  He also points to the double-standard in the media and liberal response: “If Bush had proposed what Obama has proposed, they would have been putting Prozac in the water at the ACLU.”

These are legitimate concerns, to which I would add a few more:

1.  While Michelle herself may be entirely unmotivated by ulterior interests here, there’s little doubt (a) that the political strategists in the White House are mindful of how her holy road show serves the President’s electoral interests with a key demographic group whose support for the GOP is the biggest obstacle the Democrats face in 2012 and beyond, and (b) that these visits do actually serve the purpose of inclining evangelical voters, especially the women in these congregations, more favorably toward the Obamas.

Which raises the question: Is this a good thing for churches to do?  Granted that children’s health is an important matter, is it a good idea for churches to provide platforms for politicians — or First Ladies, for that matter?  To be clear: both sides do it, and it’s never sat well with me.  George W. Bush spoke at churches on occasion, just as Barack Obama has.  Then there are churches, such as my own Perimeter Church (also in the northern suburbs of Atlanta, not far from North Point), that will not be used as political platforms.  Politicians are welcome to visit the church, but they are not welcome to come on stage and use the church for partisan interests.  I’m not viewing this as a Constitutional problem, but as a spiritual and ecclesial one.  By presenting politicians to their congregations, churches tacitly align themselves with the politicians’ interests, and becomes tools that serve the agendas of political parties.

Churches need to think about this theologically and with great care.  While everyone can get behind healthy eating and exercise for children, the toolkit does not equip churches to do their own independent work but transforms the churches into cogs in the machinery of the federal government.  Of course, increased dependence on government serves the interests of the party that represents big government (would you vote against the people you depend on to send you food stamps?), and expresses a particular political ideology.  When churches earn favor with the state by performing the tasks the government prefers, their motives become mixed and their authority compromised.  They also tend to lose their capacity to speak prophetically against the political party that controls the government with which they partner.

2.  The other worry is that this encourages churches more and more to be community service centers rather than proclaimers of the gospel of Christ who live out that proclamation and Christ’s missional call in the ways in which the Spirit guides them.  Clyne points to the churches’ work of “personal transformation,” and to the dramatic effects of the deterioration of family structures on health and chronic welfare dependency.  Of course, this needn’t be an either/or.  And it shouldn’t be.  The church professes the gospel of Christ, the grace of God transforms individuals, and the redeemed are called to lives of service.  The inward transformation can and should produce outward transformation.  Churches that emphasize one at the expense of the other do their congregations a disservice.

Yet it’s a matter of priorities and right theology.  Everyone agrees that a decent society ought to have a safety net; everyone agrees that churches should be involved redemptively in their communities.  Yet something feels off when the federal government is encouraging churches to start community gardens and help local schools install salad bars.  These are worthy things to do, and doing these things in love can reflect Christ.  But hopefully churches will focus first on the proclamation of the gospel, on rightly teaching the Word of God, on worshiping in spirit and truth — and will let their witness to Christ and service to the least of these come from the overflow of God’s love and grace within them.  Otherwise the churches might as well be secular service organizations.

Christian Approach to Politics

Christians in Government

Election 2012

Separation of Church and State

The Obama Presidency

Barack Obama

church and state

faith-based office

health

Michelle Obama

Obama

obesity

Previous Post



June 21, 2011

Have Evangelicals Loved the Gay Community?

Next Post



June 23, 2011 "Is Homosexuality a Choice?" is Not the Right Question


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abortion adoption Africa Aging AIDS America Worship American history Americolatry An Open Letter to a College Freshman animals Apologetics art Atheism Authors Barack Obama Bible Biblical Scholarship Billy Graham Blogging Bono Book Review Books That Change Lives Breakfast Links Bulletin Board Business Children Christian Approach to Politics Christian Media Christian Right Derangement Syndrome Christianity and Homosexuality Christians in Government Christmas Chuck Colson CLS v Martinez Comic Creation Creativity and the Arts Cross Examinations Cross Investigations Daily Fragment Daily Trinity Death debt Deep Thoughts on Fatherhood depression economy education Election 2012 entertainment Environment Epistemology Erik Campano Euthanasia Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Gays Everyday Transcendence evil evolution Facebook Jesus faith Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics faith and reason family Feminism foreign affairs Franklin Graham Future of Evangelicalism Galen D. gay marriage George W. Bush Guest Posts Guns Gymnastics Harold Camping Heaven Hell Holidays Hollywood Homosexuality iam2.org Illegal Immigration immigration Immigration Reform Injustice Inspiration Interviews Islam Jeremy Lin Jesus jesus christ John Mark Reynolds Johnnie Moore Judgment Day Just War Theory Killing Osama Link of the Day Lists of the Week Mark Goldblatt Marriage Military Missions Mitt Romney Modern Western Thought Monastic wisdom Mormonism Morning Hash Morning Report Motherhood Movies Obamacare Old Testament Orphan Care Palin Parenting Pastoral Resources Patheos Peace Between Religions PEPFAR Persecution Peter Wehner Peter Wehner Philosophy Political Quotes of the Day politics Politics and Economics Pornography Prejudice Prisoner Rape Question of the Week Race Radical Faith Rapture Ravi Zacharias Rick Santorum Russia Salvation Sarah Palin Scandals Science Science and Faith Separation of Church and State Series sex sex slavery social justice Social Justice Ministry Spiritual Disciplines sports Steven Tyler Suffering Suicide Sunday Funnies T. Dalrymple Tea Party Technology terrorism The Christian Media Files The Daily Trinity The Electorate The Ethics of Rhetoric The Future of Seminary Education The Middle East The Obama Presidency theological Theological Renewal Theology Uncategorized Understanding Evangelicalism Vocation war War and Peace With Distinction Word to the Wise Writers

Select a Month October 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group believes in "baptism by immersion only"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Presbyterians Lutherans Baptists Catholics

Related posts from Philosophical Fragments

Evangelical

Reflections on the Gay Marriage Decision

Philosophical Fragments

Evangelical

Where Franklin Graham Has Gone Wrong

Philosophical Fragments

Evangelical

Understanding a More Religious and Assertive Russia

Philosophical Fragments

Evangelical

Speak Softly, Conservatives

Philosophical Fragments

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

Falling Leaves: A Living Parable on Letting Go

I’ve spent the vast majority of my life in the southeast corner...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube