Was O'Donnell Right About the "Separation" of Church and State?

Last updated on: October 20, 2010 at 1:17 pm by Timothy Dalrymple

Was O'Donnell Right About the "Separation" of Church and State? 2010-10-20T13:17:30-04:00 Timothy Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday, liberal blogs were delighted to find two occasions to mock Tea-Party-associated women. The first was provided by Sarah Palin, who warned Tea Partiers that they should not yet “party like it’s 1773.” This got a number of professionally opinionated people, from Markos Moulitsas (of “Daily Kos” fame) to Gwen Ifill, to marvel over Twitter about her stupidity. Surely she meant 1776!?

Turns out she was referring to the actual Boston Tea Party, which took place in 1773. In context, the referent is clear. But bloggers and commentators did not bother to do a little research, so sure were they that they had found another example of the gobsmacking ignorance of Sarah Palin. Yet they were the ones with egg on their faces.

The second example comes courtesy of Christine O’Donnell. Now, I am not an O’Donnell fan. I would rather she win than Coons, but she is not my kind of candidate. Still, she should be represented honestly. So what happened?

During a debate at a law school, her opponent, Chris Coons, said that one of the “indispensable principles” of Constitutional law is “the separation of church and state.” Anyone who is familiar with conservative thought on faith and politics will know that this raises a red flag. Christine O’Donnell obviously thought that she might be able to back Coons into a trap.

“Where in the Constitution is the separation of Church and State?” she asked O’Donnell. As the video shows, there is laughter and disbelief in the auditorium; you can hear people in the crowd exclaim, “Oh my God!” (Later they say, as though addressing her, “You know nothing! You know nothing!”) (Surveys consistently show that the great majority of people believe “the wall of separation” is in the Constitution; it is a shame that the same must be said of law students.)

Coons says this question “reveals her fundamental misunderstanding of what our Constitution is, how it is amended, and how it evolves. The first amendment establishes the separation–” here he pauses, and shifts course, “–and the fact that the federal government shall not establish any religion, and decisional law by the Supreme Court over many decades clarifies and enshrines that there is a separation of church and state that our church and state must respect.”

Coons clearly understands the point she wants to make — that the phrase “separation of church and state” does not actually appear in the First Amendment or anywhere in the Constitution. The “wall of separation” metaphor comes from a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote, many years after the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written, to a group of Baptists from Danbury, Connecticut (James Madison also sometimes referred to “the separation of church and state”). O’Donnell is trying to get him to say that “separation of church and state” is in the Constitution. He is trying to avoid saying that, and wants to say instead that the principle of separation has become enshrined as a matter of Constitutional law through later Supreme Court decisions.

Thus when O’Donnell presses the issue, saying, “You’re telling me that the separation of church and state is found in the First Amendment?”–Coons responds: “The government shall make no establishment of religion.”

Those in the crowd, or at least the most vocal among them, clearly do not understand the debate behind the debate. The Huffington Post also shows its ignorance, or its unwillingness to explain the nuances of the issue in the midst of its eagerness to paint O’Donnell as a moron, when it leads off its article:

“Republican Senate nominee Christine O’Donnell of Delaware on Tuesday questioned whether the U.S. Constitution calls for a separation of church and state, appearing to disagree or not know that the First Amendment bars the government from establishing religion.”

Yet these are two different things. Barring the establishment of a state religion is not the same thing as separating religion and government. Religion and government could work together in any number of ways without the establishment of a state church. As Daniel Foster points out, O’Donnell has led two organizations that have lobbied Congress to incorporate Christian values into their legislation; she knows the First Amendment and is aware of debates over the issue.

Of course, when you’re in high dudgeon, it’s hard to be corrected. William Saletan at Slate notes how O’Donnell emphasizes the word “first,” and argues she “it’s the citation that surprises her.” She “seems incredulous not just at Coons’ position against government-established religion, but that he bases it on the First Amendment.” To my mind, this is clearly wrong. She is trying to nail him down, trying to get him to say that the first amendment separates church and state. Then she will be able to show that he really doesn’t know what it is in the First Amendment. Coons, to his credit, avoids the trap. Yet he also gives only a very partial recitation of the First Amendment.

Behind this little tiff is a serious question – debated not only by the Christine O’Donnells of the world, but also be Supreme Court Justices such as Rehnquist and Scalia. Perhaps a “wall of separation” is not the most helpful metaphor when it comes to the relationship between religious groups and the government. The establishment and free exercise clauses prohibit the state from establishing an official church or from interfering in church matters; they do not prohibit the church from some forms of involvement in government, and that is why “separation” is a dubious metaphor. Even Jefferson, whose skepticism toward orthodox Christianity is well known, attended church services in the capitol. He supported the use of government funds for the construction of churches, for chaplains in the military, and even to support missionaries to Native Americans. None of this made him a Christian Reconstructionist or a Theocrat.

The establishment and free exercise clauses are arguably uni-directional; they prevent the state from interfering in the church. The “separation” metaphor is bi-directional; neither side can influence the other. In the context of Jefferson’s broader thought, even he, the coiner of the separation phrase, clearly believed that religion could be involved in some ways in government. And there are indeed two live options on this issue today. Liberals by and large want to minimize the role of religion in the public square. Conservatives believe that religion has a vital, vital role to play in the public square, and that many attempts to chase religion from the public square actually “interfere with the free exercise thereof.” Thus Scalia has objected that the “wall” metaphor has functioned as a “bulldozer” to remove religion from the public square.

Unfortunately, Coons was not willing to explain the issue fully, and O’Donnell never did. This is a teachable moment over a legitimate disagreement on the Constitution and constitutional law, but, unsurprisingly, it is passing by with a lot of sound and fury but very little actual edification.

Separation of Church and State

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 19, 2010

Adventures in Rhetoric with Barack Obama

Next Post

October 22, 2010 When Campaign Ads Go Too Far

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abortion adoption Africa Aging AIDS America Worship American history Americolatry An Open Letter to a College Freshman animals Apologetics art Atheism Authors Barack Obama Bible Biblical Scholarship Billy Graham Blogging Bono Book Review Books That Change Lives Breakfast Links Bulletin Board Business Children Christian Approach to Politics Christian Media Christian Right Derangement Syndrome Christianity and Homosexuality Christians in Government Christmas Chuck Colson CLS v Martinez Comic Creation Creativity and the Arts Cross Examinations Cross Investigations Daily Fragment Daily Trinity Death debt Deep Thoughts on Fatherhood depression economy education Election 2012 entertainment Environment Epistemology Erik Campano Euthanasia Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Gays Everyday Transcendence evil evolution Facebook Jesus faith Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics faith and reason family Feminism foreign affairs Franklin Graham Future of Evangelicalism Galen D. gay marriage George W. Bush Guest Posts Guns Gymnastics Harold Camping Heaven Hell Holidays Hollywood Homosexuality iam2.org Illegal Immigration immigration Immigration Reform Injustice Inspiration Interviews Islam Jeremy Lin Jesus jesus christ John Mark Reynolds Johnnie Moore Judgment Day Just War Theory Killing Osama Link of the Day Lists of the Week Mark Goldblatt Marriage Military Missions Mitt Romney Modern Western Thought Monastic wisdom Mormonism Morning Hash Morning Report Motherhood Movies Obamacare Old Testament Orphan Care Palin Parenting Pastoral Resources Patheos Peace Between Religions PEPFAR Persecution Peter Wehner Peter Wehner Philosophy Political Quotes of the Day politics Politics and Economics Pornography Prejudice Prisoner Rape Question of the Week Race Radical Faith Rapture Ravi Zacharias Rick Santorum Russia Salvation Sarah Palin Scandals Science Science and Faith Separation of Church and State Series sex sex slavery social justice Social Justice Ministry Spiritual Disciplines sports Steven Tyler Suffering Suicide Sunday Funnies T. Dalrymple Tea Party Technology terrorism The Christian Media Files The Daily Trinity The Electorate The Ethics of Rhetoric The Future of Seminary Education The Middle East The Obama Presidency theological Theological Renewal Theology Uncategorized Understanding Evangelicalism Vocation war War and Peace With Distinction Word to the Wise Writers

Select a Month October 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz