CLS v Martinez: David French: The Bad Fruit of a Poisonous Tree

Last updated on: June 28, 2010 at 2:24 pm by Timothy Dalrymple

CLS v Martinez: David French: The Bad Fruit of a Poisonous Tree 2010-06-28T14:24:25-04:00 Timothy Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I just got off the phone with David French, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. A more thorough rendering of the conversation will be available soon, but for now, here is a rough and ready transcription of one part I found especially interesting:

“In many ways I see this case as the fruit of the poisonous tree of a previous bad Supreme Court decision. That previous bad Supreme Court decision is the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin Sysm v. Southworth. In that case the Supreme Court ruled that they can force students to pay money into a pool that is then used to fund student organizations that other students abhor. In other words, you are forced to fund speech that you abhor.

“Typically, outside of the campus, you cannot do that. It would be considered forced speech, a violation of your rights of conscience. But in the Southworth case, the Supreme Court said, in a university environment….we’re going to allow the university to require students to pay for all kinds of student organizations. So they are forced to fund even the student groups they find abhorrent.

“In Ginsberg’s opinion, she says, under the all-comers policy, no student can be excluded from a group they are forced to fund. So you see the direct line of thinking…You take a bad decision, that students may be forced to fund groups that they find abhorrent…and you conclude that no student should be excluded from a group the student is forced to fund. What you’ve done is in essence you have plucked the fruit of the poisonous tree here.

“Underlying a lot of the court’s decision was this mindfulness of the Southworth regime that they created where they forced students to fund expression. They viewed it through that prism. It obviously impacted the court. In fact, it’s one of the first things mentioned as a justification for the decision.”

More soon.

CLS v Martinez

Faith and Politics

Previous Post

June 28, 2010

CLS v Martinez: The Alliance Defense Fund Responds

Next Post

June 28, 2010 CLS v Martinez: Michael McConnell on the Dangers of this Ruling

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abortion adoption Africa Aging AIDS America Worship American history Americolatry An Open Letter to a College Freshman animals Apologetics art Atheism Authors Barack Obama Bible Biblical Scholarship Billy Graham Blogging Bono Book Review Books That Change Lives Breakfast Links Bulletin Board Business Children Christian Approach to Politics Christian Media Christian Right Derangement Syndrome Christianity and Homosexuality Christians in Government Christmas Chuck Colson CLS v Martinez Comic Creation Creativity and the Arts Cross Examinations Cross Investigations Daily Fragment Daily Trinity Death debt Deep Thoughts on Fatherhood depression economy education Election 2012 entertainment Environment Epistemology Erik Campano Euthanasia Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Gays Everyday Transcendence evil evolution Facebook Jesus faith Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics faith and reason family Feminism foreign affairs Franklin Graham Future of Evangelicalism Galen D. gay marriage George W. Bush Guest Posts Guns Gymnastics Harold Camping Heaven Hell Holidays Hollywood Homosexuality iam2.org Illegal Immigration immigration Immigration Reform Injustice Inspiration Interviews Islam Jeremy Lin Jesus jesus christ John Mark Reynolds Johnnie Moore Judgment Day Just War Theory Killing Osama Link of the Day Lists of the Week Mark Goldblatt Marriage Military Missions Mitt Romney Modern Western Thought Monastic wisdom Mormonism Morning Hash Morning Report Motherhood Movies Obamacare Old Testament Orphan Care Palin Parenting Pastoral Resources Patheos Peace Between Religions PEPFAR Persecution Peter Wehner Peter Wehner Philosophy Political Quotes of the Day politics Politics and Economics Pornography Prejudice Prisoner Rape Question of the Week Race Radical Faith Rapture Ravi Zacharias Rick Santorum Russia Salvation Sarah Palin Scandals Science Science and Faith Separation of Church and State Series sex sex slavery social justice Social Justice Ministry Spiritual Disciplines sports Steven Tyler Suffering Suicide Sunday Funnies T. Dalrymple Tea Party Technology terrorism The Christian Media Files The Daily Trinity The Electorate The Ethics of Rhetoric The Future of Seminary Education The Middle East The Obama Presidency theological Theological Renewal Theology Uncategorized Understanding Evangelicalism Vocation war War and Peace With Distinction Word to the Wise Writers

Select a Month October 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz