Brian McLaren, the Misuses of Rhetoric, and Babies and Bathwater

Last updated on: April 6, 2010 at 5:50 pm by Timothy Dalrymple

Brian McLaren, the Misuses of Rhetoric, and Babies and Bathwater 2010-04-06T17:50:49-04:00 Timothy Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When the Evangelical Portal presents an article of particular import, I send out emails to prominent Christian bloggers and websites to let them know. A funny thing happened when I informed evangelical bloggers about our Brian McLaren article. More than a few of those bloggers, including bloggers who are not known as conservatives, responded that they had no interest in material that would bring more attention to McLaren’s work. It was not that McLaren was pushing the envelope. It was that he was leading people astray on matters of basic salvific import.

McLaren is not unaccustomed to opposition. What is new is that many moderates, and even some who are considered liberals, are now joining the ranks against “McLarenism.”

There are (at least) two ways of interpreting this. The first is that McLaren has diverged progressively further and further away from the truths that form the essential deposit of the Christian faith. The second is that moderates and perhaps even liberals are being bludgeoned into submission by the conservatives, pressured into condemning McLaren even though they recognize the rightness of his cause.

McLaren himself (with a rather far-fetched analogy to the famed Milgram experiment at Yale) promotes the second interpretation in his new article at the Huffington Post. The title, “Why Do Evangelicals Dislike Me So Much?”, is disingenuous. When McLaren began his writing career, he was widely though not universally admired within evangelical circles. Many evangelical authors who push the envelope socially, morally and theologically have maintained strong relationships within the evangelical community – when they are seen as honest seekers after truth who converse well and charitably with those who differ from them, and when they are seen to be wrestling with these questions in the right ways, seeking scriptural truth. The response to McLaren’s A New Kind of Christianity has nothing to do with “liking” or “disliking” McLaren. It has very little to do with him, in fact. It has to do with his rejection of truths, values and authorities that are absolutely essential to the Christian faith.

I will have more to say, next week, on how McLaren is throwing out the baby and keeping the bathwater. He is making a political agenda the criterion for his “new” Christianity, rather than making the Word and the theology it implies the criterion for all social, moral and political endeavors.

But his rhetoric is frustrating. Consider, for example, this:

“So the best way to stay out of religious trouble is to keep your opinions private whenever they differ from the most strident inquisitors in your religious community. If you feel a twinge of guilt when you condemn a person for being gay, don’t think about it. Just press the button. When you use dehumanizing language for people of other faith traditions — or of other opinions within your own faith tradition — don’t feel bad. Just press the button again. Side with your religious authority figures, not with those being criticized, scapegoated, condemned, excluded, and zapped. If you believe what you’re told and verbally zap those who differ, you won’t get in trouble.”

Either you are with McLaren or you stand with “religious authority figures” over against the excluded and oppressed. Yet these are not the only options. That you might maintain the orthodox Christian faith and nonetheless stand with the needy and the ostracized is apparently not an option worth considering. This kind of rhetoric is, unfortunately, classic McLaren. It is not truth-seeking. It is not charitable. It is sloganeering, caricaturing. It is the language of a political agitator and manipulator, not someone who wants to open the Word and reason together with brothers in the faith.

Even if he maintains all the same (what I view as wrongheaded) beliefs, I would love to see McLaren return to the conversation in a more charitable form. People like Jim Wallis and Brian McLaren once stood for a new form of Christian political engagement, one that eschewed caricature and sloganeering and listened earnestly to both sides of every argument. Even if they failed at that ideal as often as they succeeded, the ideal itself was important. It was worth upholding. And even when I disagreed on particular policy ideas, I could agree with them on the ideal of charitable dialogue.

Unfortunately, I find that charitable dialogue no longer in evidence.

T. Dalrymple

Previous Post

April 6, 2010

Morning Report, Tuesday, April 6, 2010: iMonk, Mining Hope, Tim Keller, Acne on Everest, Nuclear Weaponry, and Elian Gonzalez

Next Post

April 7, 2010 Morning Report, April 7, 2010:

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abortion adoption Africa Aging AIDS America Worship American history Americolatry An Open Letter to a College Freshman animals Apologetics art Atheism Authors Barack Obama Bible Biblical Scholarship Billy Graham Blogging Bono Book Review Books That Change Lives Breakfast Links Bulletin Board Business Children Christian Approach to Politics Christian Media Christian Right Derangement Syndrome Christianity and Homosexuality Christians in Government Christmas Chuck Colson CLS v Martinez Comic Creation Creativity and the Arts Cross Examinations Cross Investigations Daily Fragment Daily Trinity Death debt Deep Thoughts on Fatherhood depression economy education Election 2012 entertainment Environment Epistemology Erik Campano Euthanasia Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Gays Everyday Transcendence evil evolution Facebook Jesus faith Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics faith and reason family Feminism foreign affairs Franklin Graham Future of Evangelicalism Galen D. gay marriage George W. Bush Guest Posts Guns Gymnastics Harold Camping Heaven Hell Holidays Hollywood Homosexuality iam2.org Illegal Immigration immigration Immigration Reform Injustice Inspiration Interviews Islam Jeremy Lin Jesus jesus christ John Mark Reynolds Johnnie Moore Judgment Day Just War Theory Killing Osama Link of the Day Lists of the Week Mark Goldblatt Marriage Military Missions Mitt Romney Modern Western Thought Monastic wisdom Mormonism Morning Hash Morning Report Motherhood Movies Obamacare Old Testament Orphan Care Palin Parenting Pastoral Resources Patheos Peace Between Religions PEPFAR Persecution Peter Wehner Peter Wehner Philosophy Political Quotes of the Day politics Politics and Economics Pornography Prejudice Prisoner Rape Question of the Week Race Radical Faith Rapture Ravi Zacharias Rick Santorum Russia Salvation Sarah Palin Scandals Science Science and Faith Separation of Church and State Series sex sex slavery social justice Social Justice Ministry Spiritual Disciplines sports Steven Tyler Suffering Suicide Sunday Funnies T. Dalrymple Tea Party Technology terrorism The Christian Media Files The Daily Trinity The Electorate The Ethics of Rhetoric The Future of Seminary Education The Middle East The Obama Presidency theological Theological Renewal Theology Uncategorized Understanding Evangelicalism Vocation war War and Peace With Distinction Word to the Wise Writers

Select a Month October 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz