Morning Report, Weekend Edition, August 15

Last updated on: August 15, 2009 at 10:26 am by Timothy Dalrymple

Morning Report, Weekend Edition, August 15 2009-08-15T10:26:11-04:00 Timothy Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

1. Two new items worth mentioning at the Patheos Evangelical Portal: my own piece on the birth of my daughter and how it’s changed my thinking on abortion and adoption, and a piece from a good friend of mine, and one of the country’s leading Christian ethicist, in response to Sam Harris’ condemnation of Francis Collins’ selection as head of the NIH.

2. Lots of buzz over Newt Gingrich’s interview at Politico, where he suggests that Sarah Palin has a bright future if she plays her cards right. Some of his advice is common sense (write a book, for instance). Although I wouldn’t say it’s surprising, the most interesting suggestion is that she should head a national project or center. A National Energy Project would, he says, be a natural for her. This is probably right. Thoughts?

Paul Begala demurs in the ugliest of language. My interest in Palin is primarily in the reaction she elicits from the Left, or at least from those among the Left who cannot stand middle-American Christians. I don’t buy for a minute that Palin is an intellectual lightweight. She’s accomplished too much for that. Yet I do think Republicans–and, actually, Americans–would be best served to have an opponent to Obama in 2012 who possesses an unquestioned intellectual firepower. Gingrich might have been the one, if he had not committed such indiscretions. Obama is not uniquely intelligent; there are scores in and around Washington and state capitals who are just as bright. Governor Jindal comes to mind. The problem is finding someone who combines intelligence with charisma and, quite importantly, a willingness to run and endure the onslaught that any opponent to Obama will inevitably face.

3. Discussion continues on how government money (that is, our money) should or should not be used to fund abortions. Amy Sullivan of Time reports. The Lois Capps amendment established that funds to pay for abortions, for those on the government plan, would come from premiums and not from tax dollars. Whether this is just a shell game or not is up to you. Still, since federal subsidies given to low-income families could be used for abortions, pro-life advocates are able to say, correctly, that tax dollars would still go to abortions. Two alternatives are proposed by Steve Waldman of Beliefnet and Meredith Simons of Slate. Waldman’s proposal, it seems to me, does not take the pro-life objection seriously. Even if the government cuts a check to an individual, who then forwards the money along to the doctor, it’s still our money paying for abortions. Simons’ suggestion–and actually I’ve been suggesting the same thing–is that private funds from pro-choice organizations could pay for the abortions.

What is so hilarious to me is that Amy Sullivan finds this “out-of-the-box and controversial.” It’s only thinking outside the box if the “box” is government, and one cannot imagine solving a social problem through non-governmental means. It shows, to me, a mindset that looks to the government to solve all problems.

4. The attempt to turn opposition to Obama into racism continues. One wonders whether one could produce any strong form of political satire or caricature aimed at Obama that would not be deemed racism. The supposition on the Left seems to be that all conservatives are racists anyway, so anything they do must reflect racism. Yet wasn’t it Obama himself who said that we need to learn to give our political others the benefit of the doubt with regard to motives?

5. As Politico also reports, the Dem party Brahmins are trying to prepare the most liberal in their ranks for a major compromise on health care — perhaps even dropping the government option. (Also Democrats are pushing back on the rush to get a bill passed asap.) One also has to wonder what Obama and his best and brightest were thinking. Of course they anticipated there would be resistance. Yet their erratic responses have shown just as surely that they did not expect resistance of this level. They hoped to deflect some of the opposition by cutting deals with insurance companies and big Pharma. Did they overestimate the power of Obama’s charisma? Did they misread their ‘mandate’? (They should remember that the Obama America elected was the pragmatic centrist of the general election, not the liberal activist of the primary.) Was it idealism that led them to press forward regardless of any resistance they might meet?

One of the big mistakes the Obama administration made–although it’s understandable that one would try to “exploit” the crisis in this way–was in the way they sought to portray health care reform as necessary because of the financial crisis. The perception was that Americans were frightened enough that they were willing to do anything the President told them was necessary. Yet the argument was spurious from the beginning, because the health care reform that Obama and the Democrats sought was always going to increase the costs to the government, especially in the near term. It was possible (though not particularly plausible) for Obama to suggest that this was in America’s long-term economic interest–but it was clearly not in our short-term interest, and certainly not something that should be attempted in the midst of the Great Recession. Then came the Congressional Budget Office reports that the health care reforms on the table would not reduce the deficit and would almost certainly increase it. There were several CBO reports that were highly damaging to the administration’s case, because the administration premissed the reform on the economic need laid bare in the recession.

In retrospect, it would have been better (1) for the White House to draw up the legislation itself, and, in any case, (2) to pursue more targeted changes separately. A divide and conquer strategy would have been much more pragmatic, and particular elements of the reform package could be plausibly sold as pro-economy. Instead, by rolling everything up into one massive health care reform bill, they’ve produced a bill that everyone can oppose on some level, and by letting the various Congressional committees write up their own bills they created a perfect atmosphere for confusion and dissension.

It’s not the first time I’ve wondered whether Obama cut some sort of deal–back when he was trying to win the support of party bigwigs away from the Hillary Clinton camp–that he would, in exchange for their support, give them free rein to draw up their own bills on the big issues like the stimulus, cap-and-trade and health-care reform. Thus Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi were able to reward a thousand different interest groups, but, unfortunately for us, we’ve ended up with massive, unfocused, less-effective legislative behemoths that the Senators cannot even read.

I know quite a few people who supported Obama, at least in large part, because of his perceived competence. When I pressed them for evidence of his great accomplishments, most pointed to the campaign he ran. David Axelrod is fantastic; he’s Obama’s Rove, a brilliant political strategist and media manipulator who is willing to do the dirty work for his guy. Obama’s political and media operation is usually first-rate. So far, when it comes to legislation, I’m not seeing the magnificent competence yet.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 14, 2009

On Fathering a Daughter - Or, Abortion, Adoption and the Limitless Majesty of God

Next Post

August 16, 2009 Sunday Morning Funnies and Inspiration

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abortion adoption Africa Aging AIDS America Worship American history Americolatry An Open Letter to a College Freshman animals Apologetics art Atheism Authors Barack Obama Bible Biblical Scholarship Billy Graham Blogging Bono Book Review Books That Change Lives Breakfast Links Bulletin Board Business Children Christian Approach to Politics Christian Media Christian Right Derangement Syndrome Christianity and Homosexuality Christians in Government Christmas Chuck Colson CLS v Martinez Comic Creation Creativity and the Arts Cross Examinations Cross Investigations Daily Fragment Daily Trinity Death debt Deep Thoughts on Fatherhood depression economy education Election 2012 entertainment Environment Epistemology Erik Campano Euthanasia Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Gays Everyday Transcendence evil evolution Facebook Jesus faith Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics faith and reason family Feminism foreign affairs Franklin Graham Future of Evangelicalism Galen D. gay marriage George W. Bush Guest Posts Guns Gymnastics Harold Camping Heaven Hell Holidays Hollywood Homosexuality iam2.org Illegal Immigration immigration Immigration Reform Injustice Inspiration Interviews Islam Jeremy Lin Jesus jesus christ John Mark Reynolds Johnnie Moore Judgment Day Just War Theory Killing Osama Link of the Day Lists of the Week Mark Goldblatt Marriage Military Missions Mitt Romney Modern Western Thought Monastic wisdom Mormonism Morning Hash Morning Report Motherhood Movies Obamacare Old Testament Orphan Care Palin Parenting Pastoral Resources Patheos Peace Between Religions PEPFAR Persecution Peter Wehner Peter Wehner Philosophy Political Quotes of the Day politics Politics and Economics Pornography Prejudice Prisoner Rape Question of the Week Race Radical Faith Rapture Ravi Zacharias Rick Santorum Russia Salvation Sarah Palin Scandals Science Science and Faith Separation of Church and State Series sex sex slavery social justice Social Justice Ministry Spiritual Disciplines sports Steven Tyler Suffering Suicide Sunday Funnies T. Dalrymple Tea Party Technology terrorism The Christian Media Files The Daily Trinity The Electorate The Ethics of Rhetoric The Future of Seminary Education The Middle East The Obama Presidency theological Theological Renewal Theology Uncategorized Understanding Evangelicalism Vocation war War and Peace With Distinction Word to the Wise Writers

Select a Month October 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz