Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Philosophical Fragments

Morning Report, August 7th: Angry Mobs, Jokers, Union Thugs, the Hopeless, A Huge Fannie, Taxpayer-Funded Abortions, Justice Sotomayor, and Cash for SUVs

Last updated on: August 7, 2009 at 12:39 pm   by Timothy Dalrymple

Morning Report, August 7th: Angry Mobs, Jokers, Union Thugs, the Hopeless, A Huge Fannie, Taxpayer-Funded Abortions, Justice Sotomayor, and Cash for SUVs 2009-08-07T12:39:43-04:00 Timothy Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

1.  Health care reform town halls turn ugly.  I find myself conflicted.  I am very much in support of the beautiful chaos of democracy, whether or not the protesters are voicing my own views–and it certainly is true that politicians seems increasingly distanced from the constituencies they represent, increasingly unaware that they are the ones who are supposed to listen.  Yet I don’t like it when the other side is shouted down and intimidated so that they cannot present their arguments.  Peggy Noonan has some wise words in her column today.  Most of the protesters are peaceful and orderly.  It only takes a few to make a rowdy scene, and it only takes one or two to lead to an incident that will be counter-productive to the protesters aims.  Of course, it’s true that the Left has been thuggish at times during the Bush administration (and its imagery was far more far more violent than a Joker image–and Bush had his Joker too) that the Left has been just as vicious, just a thuggish in the past.  But we all know that “he did it too” is not an excuse.

If anything is worse, however, it is the way in which the Democrats have responded.  “Astroturf” is fake grass, of course; and “astroturfing” is when a grassroots action is falsely produced.  There is no “astroturfing” involved when people who are genuinely upset are encouraged to show up at a particular time and place; if that were so, then any action from MoveOn or SEIU, Acorn or even the administration itself would amount to astroturfing.  Again, coordinating a protest is not the same as creating a protest out of whole cloth.  Furthermore, these should not be labeled as extreme fringe, angry mob, etc.  One protester has a sign with a swastika and a circle crossing it out, effectively saying “no to fascism.”  Then Nancy Pelosi tells reporters about people carrying swastikas around.  The DNC put out a talking point that said, “The right wing extremists’ use of things like devil horns on pictures of our elected officials, hanging members of Congress in effigy, breathlessly questioning the President’s citizenship and the use of Nazi SS symbols and the like just shows how outside of the mainstream the Republican Party and their allies are.”  This is dishonest, and unbecoming of the most powerful people in the nation.  These are not just a bunch of uneducated hooligans; they are genuinely and justifably upset and fearful for the consequences of such sweeping health care reform.  Yet saying “we will punch back twice as hard” (as the White House has) is escalation, not reconciliation, not change, not postpartisanship.  It’s not the way that benevolent power is supposed to act, and it’s likely to lead to more violence.

I agree with Noonan that the Democrats would be wise–and would reap a justified reward–to step back, slow down, and address people’s concerns.  Much of the fear concerns context — that politicians are attempting to enforce vast transformations of our economy and our social system in the midst of the great recession, when our deficit is already through the roof.  Much of it concerns pacing — that the politicians in D.C. appear to be in a sprint to accomplish these things as soon as possible.  The Dems are at risk of losing a significant chunk of middle America: many of them older, AARP members, moderate Democrats who found Obama inspiring and refreshing.  A not-insignificant portion of those protesting voted for Obama, and may not do so again, depending on how the White House crafts its response.  If Obama shows himself to be another brass-knuckles Chicago politician, it will not serve his interests in 2012 (or 2010, for that matter).  He should stop the DNC from putting out videos labeling the opposition in this way, and should advise against the decision to bring in union toughs, which will inevitaly lead to more conflict.  Isn’t dissent patriotic?

Early American Protesters

Early American Protesters

The health care system needs reform.  In some form or another, whether it is the government or not, we as a people need to do better to meet the needs of the least of these.  But there is no national consensus here, and on a transformation of this magnitude, there should be.

2.  The unemployment rate eases from 9.5% to 9.4%.  The number of those with jobs, however, actually decreased.  The reason?  The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which produces these numbers, calculates the unemployment number in relation to the number of those seeking jobs.  If some stop seeking jobs, because they conclude that there’s no hope, then they are dropped out of the equation and no longer show up as “unemployed.”  This is a strange sort of calculation, that some on the Left often used to throw cold water on the unemployment rate during the Bush administration, when it was around 5%.  In a recession of this depth, a great number conclude that there is no hope for a job and stop seeking.  Nearly 800,000 (or about .5% of the workforce) dropped out of the calculation between June and July.  If even half were counted as unemployed, the percentage would be somewhere between 9.7% and 9.8%.  This is not an attempt to hold down what could be positive economic indicators.  Eventually the economy should turn around, and eventually those numbers should come down.  But it is to say that we should not get carried away here–and it’s ironic that the candidate of “hope” draws a little statistical benefit from those who have lost it.

3.  Fannie Mae needs another $10 billion, bringing the total for Fannie and Freddie to nearly $100B.

4.  Does anyone else get the sense that China has responded to the global financial crisis in a much wiser, more coordinated and (in some respects) more capitalistic manner than we have?  What is so galling about the stimulus bill, apart from its size in this cnotext, is the unwise way in which the money is spent.  One of the major selling points for the stimulus was the need to upgrade our energy infrastructure — and yet less than 1% of the $787B stimulus money goes to energy infrastructure.  $6B was given to energy infrastructure; we need roughly 20 times more if we are going to accommodate the increased energy production that we need from wind (because wind is out there, but we use energy here, we need to get it from there to here more efficiently and in a larger scale).  China–which has no deficit problem, by the way; quite the opposite–passed a stimulus bill of roughly $585B, and 23% went to energy infrastructure.  Yes, China’s energy infrastructure needs more work than ours.  But ours still needs a heck of a lot of work, and we are not close to meeting the need.

If the point was to increase employment, get money into the private sector, and transform into a green energy economy, why are we spending so little on the infrastructure that could keep our companies productive, and decrease our use of foreign oil?

5.  One Senator submitted a bill by which the cars traded in as a part of the Cash for Clunkers program could be donated to charities, rather than destroyed for scrap (if you did not know, the dealer is required to destroy the car and give the previous owner whatever money it could fetch for scrap and spare parts).  Although it runs against one of the reasons given (the environmental) for C4C, it seems like a nice way to help the poor and needy.  It was shot down 41-56.  You can see the roll call here.

6.  The Associated Press first reported that taxpayer money would not go to fund abortions under the proposed health care reform.  They took a lot of heat for poor reporting; the story was handed over for a new look, and now the Associated Press declares that the opposite is true: taxpayer money will be used for abortions.  “Health care legislation before Congress would allow a new government-sponsored insurance plan to cover abortions, a decision that would affect millions of women and recast federal policy on the divisive issue.”  As one blogger put it, Congress attempted to make an elaborate end-run around the Hyde amendment, but, as the AP story shows, it’s not a successful ruse.

Click on the picture to go to Patheos discussion of abortion.

Click on the picture to go to Patheos' discussion of abortion.

As one reader pointed out, this is already the case in some states.  Yet a person can leave a state and still remain an American citizen.  Making it a federal matter is different.  All Americans, regardless of where they live, will have their money go to abortions.  Those on the religious Left should push hard on this: if we are interested in finding common ground, we should all agree that those who object to abortion on a fundamental moral level should not have to pay for it.  The very idea is deeply abhorrent to many Americans.  Is there not enough money, among those who believe strongly in abortion rights, to cover the ‘needs’ of those who desire but cannot afford abortions?

7.  Justice Sotomayor.  I cannot really give credit to Democrats on this, since they filibustered Miguel Estrada for years, because they were afraid he would be nominated to the Supreme Court and be the first Hispanic.  Contemplating a conservative Catholic Hispanic on the court was a source of great angst, much as Clarence Thomas was, for fear that Republicans would make inroads with a large and important minority group.  However, while I cannot credit the Democrats, I do credit Hispanics.  I hope they are proud that they have risen to the highest levels of American society, and proud to have a Hispanic American on the highest court in the land.

8.  Turns out that many of the car models benefiting from the Cash for Clunkers are actually trucks, including large trucks and SUV’s.  The original “top 10” numbers were misleading; another case of funny numbers.

9.  Finally, today’s Two Sides.  Two lefties (here and here) examine what they perceive to be the mistakes of the young administration, while Chares Krauthammer suggests a different approach to health care reform and another conservative tries to explain to befuddled liberals why so many are not enthused about the proposed changes.

Uncategorized

astroturfing

cash for clunkers

China

health care reform

Krauthammer

Noonan

Obama

Sotomayor

unemployment

unions

Previous Post



August 7, 2009

On Abortion

Next Post



August 10, 2009 Morning Report, August 10th


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abortion adoption Africa Aging AIDS America Worship American history Americolatry An Open Letter to a College Freshman animals Apologetics art Atheism Authors Barack Obama Bible Biblical Scholarship Billy Graham Blogging Bono Book Review Books That Change Lives Breakfast Links Bulletin Board Business Children Christian Approach to Politics Christian Media Christian Right Derangement Syndrome Christianity and Homosexuality Christians in Government Christmas Chuck Colson CLS v Martinez Comic Creation Creativity and the Arts Cross Examinations Cross Investigations Daily Fragment Daily Trinity Death debt Deep Thoughts on Fatherhood depression economy education Election 2012 entertainment Environment Epistemology Erik Campano Euthanasia Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Gays Everyday Transcendence evil evolution Facebook Jesus faith Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics faith and reason family Feminism foreign affairs Franklin Graham Future of Evangelicalism Galen D. gay marriage George W. Bush Guest Posts Guns Gymnastics Harold Camping Heaven Hell Holidays Hollywood Homosexuality iam2.org Illegal Immigration immigration Immigration Reform Injustice Inspiration Interviews Islam Jeremy Lin Jesus jesus christ John Mark Reynolds Johnnie Moore Judgment Day Just War Theory Killing Osama Link of the Day Lists of the Week Mark Goldblatt Marriage Military Missions Mitt Romney Modern Western Thought Monastic wisdom Mormonism Morning Hash Morning Report Motherhood Movies Obamacare Old Testament Orphan Care Palin Parenting Pastoral Resources Patheos Peace Between Religions PEPFAR Persecution Peter Wehner Peter Wehner Philosophy Political Quotes of the Day politics Politics and Economics Pornography Prejudice Prisoner Rape Question of the Week Race Radical Faith Rapture Ravi Zacharias Rick Santorum Russia Salvation Sarah Palin Scandals Science Science and Faith Separation of Church and State Series sex sex slavery social justice Social Justice Ministry Spiritual Disciplines sports Steven Tyler Suffering Suicide Sunday Funnies T. Dalrymple Tea Party Technology terrorism The Christian Media Files The Daily Trinity The Electorate The Ethics of Rhetoric The Future of Seminary Education The Middle East The Obama Presidency theological Theological Renewal Theology Uncategorized Understanding Evangelicalism Vocation war War and Peace With Distinction Word to the Wise Writers

Select a Month October 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What were the Ten Commandments written down on?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Scrolls Papyrus Stone tablets The Ark of the Covenant

Related posts from Philosophical Fragments

Evangelical

The West's Deafening Silence on China's Forced Abortions

Philosophical Fragments

Evangelical

Breakfast Links for 12/21/12 - End-of-the-World-Party; 300 Million...

Philosophical Fragments

Evangelical

Breakfast Links for 12/05/12: Smell the Catastrophe; Your...

Philosophical Fragments

Evangelical

Breakfast Links for 11/27/12 - Liberal Women and...

Philosophical Fragments

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube