Obama's Sinking Popularity. Does it Matter?

Last updated on: July 24, 2009 at 4:31 pm by Timothy Dalrymple

Obama's Sinking Popularity. Does it Matter? 2009-07-24T16:31:49-04:00 Timothy Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As mentioned in the Morning Report today, Barack Obama’s poll numbers are sinking at a fairly alarming rate. They should not seriously concern anyone for Obama’s political future, in my view; approval numbers this far away from the next election contest don’t mean much. Ever since taking office, Obama has been spending political capital at a swift rate. As Bush did in 2004, Obama will have abundant opportunity to campaign again and re-present himself to the American people. (Internationally, Obama is quite popular, at least in Europe; less so in those places where most of today’s terrorists come from).

Yet it does show that three things have changed. Although they are negative developments for the Obama team in the short term, they may serve Obama’s long-term (legacy) interests as well as the United States (oh yeah, that) for the better.

1. First, the extraordinary momentum that Obama had guilt up in January is finally burning away, and this will change the calculus of power between his administration and the Congress. Reid and Pelosi have largely had their way because Obama has entrusted them with the sausage-grinding of the legislative process, yet rank-and-file members of the party, and certainly the centrist Blue Dogs, have been bulldozed by the Obama administration. Rahm Emanuel is a champion arm twister, and you can be sure that when he heads down to Capitol Hill he has Obama’s approval ratings at hand. The way the Obama camp wielded power in Washington was predicated in large part on his popularity with the American people. If they could not win the argument through persuasion and deals, they won the argument through brute force. “I hear you, but we won the election, and the American people are behind us.” No one wished to cross Obama because Obama had the press corps and approval ratings in the mid-60s. Arm-twisting only gets you so far when your political capital is diminishing.

The reason this is especially important is because the Blue Dog caucus is of absolutely critical importance to the Obama agenda, and the Blue Dogs especially will feel freer to flex their muscles as the approval numbers head south. Since Obama abandoned his early gestures of bipartisanship and wrote off the Republicans, he cannot move his priorities through Congress without the help of the moderate Democrats. Yet the Blue Dogs are (at least theoretically) opposed in principle to much of what Obama wishes to do, and if Obama cannot move them with an argument that *this* is what the American people want, he will find them much harder to budge (or buy).

2. Second, Obama is entering a phase of his term when he will be judged less by rhetoric and more by results. He has been in office now for six months. The American people understood that he “inherited” a number of problems, some of them severe, and no one expected to have everything peachy-keen by now. I think it’s fair to say, however, that the American people as a whole expected more. Obama has not quite delivered on post-partisan harmony, and he certainly hasn’t restored the economy in the way that he made sound so easy before the election. He has not substantially changed policies related to the war on terror, or even Iraq and Afghanistan. His most significant achievements so far have been his stimulus bill and the world-record budget he proposed, and the public is not exactly enamored with either of those right now.

In sum, rhetoric begins to ring hollow, and in fact it quickly becomes a negative, when the results are not there. If the results begin to roll in, then Obama can take justified credit and enjoy the rewards politically. If they do not, the American people are no longer going to trust his word. Every time he waxes eloquent, in fact, they will think to themselves, “Here he goes again.” The more eloquent he becomes, the more they will resent the distance between his rhetoric and his results.

3. Third, the Obama administration may begin to sense its own limitations and actually craft its agenda accordingly. Here is where these developments could become positive for Obama’s legacy and for the future of the country.

Obama’s approval ratings, and his favor in the eyes of the press, made him seem omnipotent, and a sense of omnipotence leads to overreach. The administration would be wise to withdraw during the August recess, fall off the front pages for a while, regroup, and come back with a more focused agenda that appeals to a broader swath of the political spectrum. Knowing one’s limitations is a part of wisdom, and the administration could emerge from this, if they are willing to learn, as a wiser administration. With a strong majority in the House and a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, Obama can pass legislation that is universally opposed by Republicans and resisted by moderates in his own party. But if it’s universally opposed by Republicans and resisted by moderate Democrats, then that means a majority of the American people are also likely to be opposed. A less radical agenda would find less favor at MoveOn.org, but more favor with Americans in general, and Obama will accomplish more of value in the long run (or, from the conservative perspective, at least do less harm) if he is not given carte blanche, but held accountable by reasonable people on both sides, forced by middling approval numbers to reject the extremes and embrace the best ideas of both parties.

The question, then, is whether the Obama camp is willing to learn and grow, or whether they are determined to forge ahead for ideological reasons. My guess is that there will be a combination of pragmatism and principle here. America is deeply invested in a President who had not even finished his first term in the Senate. He is young, talented, intelligent, and articulate, but he was never very experienced. Will he learn from his experience now? Let us hope so.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 24, 2009

Morning Report, July 24: Cultural Sins, Approval Ratings, and Tiger Woods

Next Post

July 25, 2009 Morning Report, July 25: Hudson Taylor, Ri Hyon Ok and Tony Jones

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Abortion adoption Africa Aging AIDS America Worship American history Americolatry An Open Letter to a College Freshman animals Apologetics art Atheism Authors Barack Obama Bible Biblical Scholarship Billy Graham Blogging Bono Book Review Books That Change Lives Breakfast Links Bulletin Board Business Children Christian Approach to Politics Christian Media Christian Right Derangement Syndrome Christianity and Homosexuality Christians in Government Christmas Chuck Colson CLS v Martinez Comic Creation Creativity and the Arts Cross Examinations Cross Investigations Daily Fragment Daily Trinity Death debt Deep Thoughts on Fatherhood depression economy education Election 2012 entertainment Environment Epistemology Erik Campano Euthanasia Evangelicalism Evangelicals and Gays Everyday Transcendence evil evolution Facebook Jesus faith Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics Faith and Politics faith and reason family Feminism foreign affairs Franklin Graham Future of Evangelicalism Galen D. gay marriage George W. Bush Guest Posts Guns Gymnastics Harold Camping Heaven Hell Holidays Hollywood Homosexuality iam2.org Illegal Immigration immigration Immigration Reform Injustice Inspiration Interviews Islam Jeremy Lin Jesus jesus christ John Mark Reynolds Johnnie Moore Judgment Day Just War Theory Killing Osama Link of the Day Lists of the Week Mark Goldblatt Marriage Military Missions Mitt Romney Modern Western Thought Monastic wisdom Mormonism Morning Hash Morning Report Motherhood Movies Obamacare Old Testament Orphan Care Palin Parenting Pastoral Resources Patheos Peace Between Religions PEPFAR Persecution Peter Wehner Peter Wehner Philosophy Political Quotes of the Day politics Politics and Economics Pornography Prejudice Prisoner Rape Question of the Week Race Radical Faith Rapture Ravi Zacharias Rick Santorum Russia Salvation Sarah Palin Scandals Science Science and Faith Separation of Church and State Series sex sex slavery social justice Social Justice Ministry Spiritual Disciplines sports Steven Tyler Suffering Suicide Sunday Funnies T. Dalrymple Tea Party Technology terrorism The Christian Media Files The Daily Trinity The Electorate The Ethics of Rhetoric The Future of Seminary Education The Middle East The Obama Presidency theological Theological Renewal Theology Uncategorized Understanding Evangelicalism Vocation war War and Peace With Distinction Word to the Wise Writers

Select a Month October 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz