Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Peter Enns

I&I and Inerrancy

There are numerous statements on inerrancy floating about, and the last thing the world needs is one more thrown onto the pile. Still, a word or two seems to be in order.

I affirm that I am committed to the Bible’s inerrancy as a function of its divine origin. If I may offer a thumbnail definition, the Bible as it is is without error because the Bible as it is is God’s Word.

This is not the type of definition of inerrancy that will satisfy everyone, but it strikes at the heart of the matter for me: my belief in Scripture is rooted in my belief in God, and whatever he has deemed good and right to give us is where any discussion begins. Such a confession does not predispose us to affirmin what way Scripture is without error. Rather, it puts us in a position of reverent expectancy to see what the Spirit will teach us from and about Scripture, to be self-reflective enough to allow the very categories about which we speak of Scripture to be driven by Scripture. Our own frames of reference, however unavoidable and even valuable as they might be, must be trained to take a back seat.

To put it another way, a belief in Scripture as God’s word is an article of faith, a gift of the Spirit, and is confirmed by faithful study and following Jesus within a community of believers. It is not where we end up after some rational proofs. It is where we begin so that we can end there.

This is why, as we try to understand and articulate the nature of Scripture, we must be engaged in areas of study that include (though not to the exclusion of other fields) the historical study of Scripture, i.e., Scripture in context. I am convinced that clearer and clearer notions of Scripture’s nature will result from biblicists, theologians, practitioners, etc., working together to bring their own areas of study and experiences to bear on the matter.

I would certainly expect some to object that such a “minimalist” definition of inerrancy leaves the Bible open to what I want to find there. I feel the opposite is the case, and I hope my points below will dissuade such a conclusion. I might also add that any definition of inerrancy, even the strictest ones, ultimately runs into the same problem, that of conforming the Holy text to our own notions rather than the other way around.

So, I believe the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, existing as they do by God’s design and at his pleasure, are precisely what he intended for his people to have, and are therefore the only infallible rule of faith and practice. This affirmation includes:

 

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube