One Mormon Feminist’s Thoughts on the New First Presidency

Last updated on: January 18, 2018 at 5:40 pm by Emily Belanger

One Mormon Feminist’s Thoughts on the New First Presidency 2018-01-18T17:40:15+00:00 Emily Belanger

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image of President Nelson acquired through wikimedia commons

A friend recently asked me to share my thoughts on Russell M. Nelson’s appointment as the new President of the Church and his choice of counselors.

My feelings and thoughts are both still somewhat jumbled, in part because I didn’t actually expect Pres. Nelson to break with the (totally unofficial) tradition and send a counselor back to the Q12. So I’ll ignore my feelings and stick to my thoughts on each apostle who just joined or left the First Presidency, and I’ll give those thoughts to you unfiltered, unedited.

President Nelson: President Nelson is the first president of the Church in some time to be sealed to more than one wife. After his first wife passed away, President Nelson was sealed to a woman who was not even born at the time of his first marriage. In fact, his current wife is younger than his oldest daughter.

Is there anything inherently wrong with a retirement-age man marrying a middle-aged woman who’s more than 2 decades his junior? No, there probably isn’t. Doctrinally, it’s certainly not a sin. However, as a feminist, I can’t help but wonder what influence if any it will have on the way church membership discusses and views the Church’s history with polygamy. I’d hazard a guess that many members don’t have any intention of participating in Eternal polygamy. Certainly, many women find those types of age disparities… squicky, for lack of a better term. When it’s combined with Eternal polygamy, it can feel doubly so.

President Nelson has also been a vocal proponent of the controversial “November policy” that excludes children of same-sex couples from Church ordinances. Given the state of President Monson’s health toward the end of his life, and given the fact he never once made a public statement about the policy himself, I suspect that while he gave his approval of the policy during a lucid moment (and people with dementia do have lucid moments), the policy was likely engineered by others in the Q15, quite possibly senior apostles Nelson and Oaks.

So on some level, I don’t see much changing as far as Church policy. I suspect that Nelson and Oaks have already been directing things. I know some people will say, “But officially the First Presidency leads when the president of the Church is incapacitated,” to which I say: officially, yes – but don’t you think it would make sense for junior apostles in the First Presidency to defer to the judgment of senior apostles whom they know to be next in line? I’m not suggesting a coup or power struggle, to be clear. I’m suggesting that the Q15 talks and is persuaded by the things other members of the quorum say and that it would simply make sense for newer members of the quorum to sometimes defer to the judgment of more senior members.

I do think Matt Bowman makes a good point in his Washington Post piece about how style matters and may change with this shift in leadership:

“Nelson, it seems, may be inclined to a different leadership style. He has been the Mormon leader most vocal in his defense of the church’s 2015 policies on same-sex marriage**,** calling it “the will of the Lord.” Monson never mentioned the policy change in a public address at all. Nelson has also broken with recent precedent in the selection of his counselors. It is quite common for a new church president to retain the counselors of the president who preceded him in office; indeed, a new church president has not dropped a counselor since 1970.”

President Oaks: adding President Oaks to the First Presidency makes a lot of sense. When President Monson’s health declined, and the senior-most apostle was not in the First Presidency with him, it created uncertainty among many members, who wondered who was really directing things (myself included, as you can tell). Whether there was any uncertainty within the Q15 or it was entirely a misreading from the outside, adding his likely successor to the First Presidency is a very smart move on Pres. Nelson’s part. As a 93-year-old man, President Nelson is likely also anticipating that he may not be in his current role for very long. He could surprise everyone and live another decade, but that’s unlikely.

Oaks and Nelson as a combination certainly send a message of social retrenchment, as so many are pointing out. It’s also noteworthy that yesterday President Oaks explicitly stated that leaders are not infallible. We all know that, but lay members have a tendency to still talk as if the Q15 is infallible.

President Eyring: I can see why President Nelson wanted to keep at least one person from the previous First Presidency, and President Eyring makes sense, as he has more experience there than Uchtdorf and more apostolic seniority. Part of me is a little surprised he didn’t bring in Holland or Ballard and send Eyring back to the Q12, but like I said, it makes sense to keep someone who knows what it’s like to be in the First Presidency.

Elder Uchtdorf: Like many, I’m sad that he will likely give fewer General Conference talks now (especially during Women’s Session). Like most Mormons, I’m guilty of having favorite apostles, and Uchtdorf is definitely my favorite. While selecting spiritual thoughts for a class I was teaching at one of the CES schools, I once realized that half of my spiritual thoughts were Uchtdorf quotes. No, it was not something I’d planned. Those were just the quotes that spoke to me.

Some members will speculate that his return to the Q12 is a rebuff of the inclusivity he has preached. However, I don’t see any evidence that President Nelson was motivated by something like that. I find it far more likely that the reasons I listed above motivated him to make these changes. And it wouldn’t surprise me if Uchtdorf found his way back into the First Presidency 5 or 10 years down the road.

Overall thoughts: Like many members who were and remain troubled by the infamous November Policy, I’m cautious about some things right now. LGBTQ Mormons are on my mind this week, and I understand why this change in leadership is difficult for so many of them. However, I don’t think the direction the Church is currently heading will change under the new leadership, even if it sometimes feels different, since Nelson and Oaks have such different personalities than we grew used to with Monson and Uchtdorf in the First Presidency.

I also suspect there could be some surprises in the future that will reassure progressive Mormons somewhat. I’m very curious to see who is called to the two vacant apostleships in April, though I’m still afraid to get my hopes up about seeing more racial diversity in that quorum. And I’m relieved that the current President of the Church has his mental faculties and a surprising amount of energy for someone in his nineties.

Mormonism, politics, Romney

Previous Post

January 6, 2018

Following a Prophet Who Lacks Charisma

Next Post

February 3, 2018 On Mormons and Planets

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American society Art baptism Blogging Book of Mormon Book review Brigham Young Brigham Young University Bundy Catholicism Christianity Communalism Community of Christ conferences conversion correlation Culture denominations Digital History Discipline Councils diversity Doctrine Donald Trump education Emma Smith ethics family feminism fiction Film review food French Polynesia Fundamentalism Gay rights Gender global Gun politics Halloween health History Honor Code hymns Joseph Smith Kirtland Temple law of consecration massacre site military Ministering missionary moderate Mormon feminism Modern Mormonism Mormon origins Mormon War Mormonism Mormonism, politics, Romney Obama Peace politics Polygamy Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Priesthood Protestantism Race Religious freedom Revelation Reviews sacred sites Scientology Scripture Secularization See Stones sexual assault Star Wars television temples Tithing Utah violence war women's ordination

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Samson's mother?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Manoah's wife Delilah Hannah Ruth