Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Peculiar People

Home
Latter-day Saint
Mormon Church Responds to Bundy-led Oregon Occupation

Mormon Church Responds to Bundy-led Oregon Occupation

Last updated on: January 5, 2016 at 5:57 am by Cody Ray Shafer

Mormon Church Responds to Bundy-led Oregon Occupation 2016-01-05T05:57:07+00:00 Cody Ray Shafer

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Obligitory Mormon Institution Image (Wikimedia commons)

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has now officially condemned the actions of a group of armed militiamen in Oregon, led by Ammon Bundy–a Mormon–and fueled by right-wing ideology, mixed with a unique brand of Mormonstyle American exceptionalism. Here’s the statement:

While the disagreement occurring in Oregon about the use of federal lands is not a Church matter, Church leaders strongly condemn the armed seizure of the facility and are deeply troubled by the reports that those who have seized the facility suggest that they are doing so based on scriptural principles. This armed occupation can in no way be justified on a scriptural basis. We are privileged to live in a nation where conflicts with government or private groups can — and should — be settled using peaceful means, according to the laws of the land.

And see, here I was all ready to write a scathing piece about how the Church’s silence is a moral failure, blah, blah, blah. I’m not going to run around really celebrating this statement though because it is kind of a no-brainer.

Personally, I think some stronger, more poignant language could be useful, like capping off the paragraph with a nice “anyone who tries to overthrow the government while identifying as Captain Moroni is a real doofus,” but will concede that this statement is limited by the constraints of PR-speak. Which is kind of a bummer, isn’t it?

I would like to point out that as of yet the armed occupants of the Malhuer National Wildlife Refuge (so badass) have not responded to the Church’s statement, but there are rumors they’ll go home if the nearby town asks nicely. I’m sure they’ll make a pit stop for donuts and hot chocolate on the way out as well, because this thing isn’t really weird enough.

And then I wonder, if they did make a big show of standing down because of the Church’s statement, wouldn’t that kind of look worse for Mormonism? Then it would prove they really are devout. I’m probably stretching here.

Anyway. To wrap up, I think pointing out the disparity in treatments from law enforcement between this incident and Ferguson or Baltimore is actually really important, as long as we recognize that so far Oregon should be the standard for how law enforcement engages with potentially volatile situations. However, as far as I know, this is the jurisdiction of the FBI, an arguably more elite force that already had to learn tough lessons with Ruby Ridge and Waco. Whereas the Ferguson police department was an already problematic institution, overmilitarized, and sitting in a tinder-box of civil rights issues and years of street-level bureaucratic mistrust. Basically, it would be nice if every major protest was given the respect and breathing room that these petty, entitled, whiners received, but there are still a lot of steps to take in urban areas where tensions are rising every day.

Mormonism, politics, Romney

Previous Post

January 4, 2016

Cliven Bundy and His Sons Are Terrorists: So Why Haven't They Been Excommunicated?

Next Post

January 5, 2016 The Next Church Handbook Change: Tithing and Affinity Fraud

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American society Art baptism Blogging Book of Mormon Book review Brigham Young Brigham Young University Bundy Catholicism Christianity Communalism Community of Christ conferences conversion correlation Culture denominations Digital History Discipline Councils diversity Doctrine Donald Trump education Emma Smith ethics family feminism fiction Film review food French Polynesia Fundamentalism Gay rights Gender global Gun politics Halloween health History Honor Code hymns Joseph Smith Kirtland Temple law of consecration massacre site military Ministering missionary moderate Mormon feminism Modern Mormonism Mormon origins Mormon War Mormonism Mormonism, politics, Romney Obama Peace politics Polygamy Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Priesthood Protestantism Race Religious freedom Revelation Reviews sacred sites Scientology Scripture Secularization See Stones sexual assault Star Wars television temples Tithing Utah violence war women's ordination

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who interpreted Nebuchadnezzar's dream of a statue?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abraham Daniel Ezekiel Joseph