Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Peculiar People

Home
Latter-day Saint
Review: “Selma”

Review: “Selma”

Last updated on: January 19, 2015 at 7:57 pm by Cody Ray Shafer

Review: “Selma” 2015-01-19T19:57:12+00:00 Cody Ray Shafer

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Selma deserves a Best Picture win, because even with all of its imperfections, it is a story that engages with history honestly and insightfully. It highlights an important part of the civil rights movement, enlightens a common narrative of a historical figure, yet respectfully keeps the integrity of Dr. King’s legacy intact.

It is good history as far as narrative filmmaking goes. Somehow I’ve managed to keep up with most of the Oscar nominees this year, and a disproportionate number of them are biopics. Cries of historical inaccuracy greeted all of them, perhaps none more so than Selma. My friend JJ Feinauer wrote a pretty good piece on it for Deseret News. Basically, this selection of films scatters the spectrum of historical inaccuracies. Foxcatcher’s main character feels the film perverts his relationship with murderer John Du Pont (though he has since backtracked), while The Imitation Game turns Alan Turing into an unlikeable savant and sanitizes his homosexuality.

Selma’s historical critics focus mainly on the relationship between King and Lyndon B. Johnson, and the involvement of other peripheral characters in the events depicted in Selma. But the amazing thing about the film is that these historical nuances are actually debatable, and Selma offers a historical perspective that is in no way definitive, but at least defendable. This is still Hollywood, so I don’t want to appear too naïve to the realities of filmmaking and drama, but despite these complaints, Selma does a good job telling a dramatic narrative in a historical context. It’s not a biopic in the traditional life-long journey sense, but rather a specific event pinpointed to explore the larger issue of a major social movement. As a result, the film shines light on details unfamiliar to most audiences. It shows the gritty politics of activism, and emphasizes the hard work and dedication of civil rights activists. It also hints at some of Dr. King’s major character flaws, and his movement’s use of media exposure to maintain control of the story. It sounds so icky when I say it like that, but that’s part of how the movement succeeded. We might criticize that aspect of politics currently, but Selma reminds us how important it is.

However,Selma is not an academic history. It is, first and foremost, a work of art, and a loving tribute to its inspiration. Dramatic licenses are allowed and sometimes necessary. From this perspective, the portrayal of LBJ needs to be weakened to emphasize the work of Dr. King. Real life people who sacrificed for the cause alongside Dr. King can get sidelined too, and while working their stories comfortably into the narrative of Selma would be admirable, it is just not time to tell their stories. The story of Selma, Alabama’s role in the civil rights movement is best told through the work of the pacifist leader, and telling that story effectively required creative choices. Considering the real life factors and human economics involved in producing a story like this, we should applaud Selma for sticking close to its intended message. The fact that there were other movements working in parallel to Dr. King’s pacifism is likely news to those who neither studied history closely nor benefit from the work they did in the first place. America learns a lot from the movies, and since this is the first really good movie about a specific part of the civil rights movement, it is no wonder Americans are clueless to how social movements are actually supposed to work.

In a perfect world, everyone who gave a significant part of their lives and livelihood to civil rights gets an Oscar nominated performance. In this world, it took fifty years to even make a mainstream movie about Dr. King, and despite a Best Picture nomination, the Academy shamefully overlooked director Ava DuVernay as well as David Oyelowo’s performance of Dr. King.

Meanwhile, American Sniper not only received six nominations, but broke box office records. It is, essentially, a horror show of American military propaganda. As history, it is just as worthy of a film treatment as Selma, but its narrative promotes an ideology that lacks criticism or nuance in favor of militant patriotism. The difference in favorability at the Oscars, hopefully unintentional, perfectly mirrors the reality of American politics. We’re fine with recognizing Dr. King as an icon, but neglect to recognize the talent of those who are willing to perpetuate the icon in the first place. Similarly, the continued efforts of people trying to realize Dr. King’s dream are met with ridicule from people who think his work ended with The Civil Rights Act.

Dr. King is still the hero. Flawed, human, political, but triumphant. The lesson? Engaging in history is rewarding, no matter how uncomfortable it makes us. Portrayals of Dr. King’s political struggles with other activists groups, or the dirt exposed by FBI, does not harm the vitality of his message of peace and equality. As Mormons concerned with honest but respectful portrayals of our own history, we should recognize that forgiveness of historical leaders is possible when their continued legacy proves worthy of our admiration. As moviegoers, we learn to appreciate the story of a real life person with some scrutiny, while accepting that human icons come with human quirks. Selma is an earnest portrayal of a human icon, which is a worthwhile achievement in cinema.

martin luther king jr.

Previous Post

January 16, 2015

Announcing the 2nd Wheatley Summer Seminar

Next Post

February 2, 2015 The Hobbit, by J.R.R. Tolkien

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American society Art baptism Blogging Book of Mormon Book review Brigham Young Brigham Young University Bundy Catholicism Christianity Communalism Community of Christ conferences conversion correlation Culture denominations Digital History Discipline Councils diversity Doctrine Donald Trump education Emma Smith ethics family feminism fiction Film review food French Polynesia Fundamentalism Gay rights Gender global Gun politics Halloween health History Honor Code hymns Joseph Smith Kirtland Temple law of consecration massacre site military Ministering missionary moderate Mormon feminism Modern Mormonism Mormon origins Mormon War Mormonism Mormonism, politics, Romney Obama Peace politics Polygamy Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Priesthood Protestantism Race Religious freedom Revelation Reviews sacred sites Scientology Scripture Secularization See Stones sexual assault Star Wars television temples Tithing Utah violence war women's ordination

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group commonly uses the Book of Common Prayer?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Presbyterians Lutherans Methodists Anglicans