Ordaining Women Is Not Going Away for LDS

Last updated on: March 22, 2014 at 11:40 pm by Taylor Petrey

Ordaining Women Is Not Going Away for LDS 2014-03-22T23:40:41+00:00 Taylor Petrey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The issue of women’s ordination in the LDS church is at least in its fourth decade. In the 1970’s, and especially in the 1980’s after the expansion of the priesthood to all worthy males in 1978, LDS women and men have published and organized in favor in women’s ordination. Such movements have been common in other American churches, which vigorously debated the issues during the 20th century. Movements for women’s ordination exist in nearly every denomination which has not already made the transition. Other Restoration-derived churches, including the Community of Christ, have ordained women for 30 years.

I know of no example of a modern church which ordains women that has reversed or even sought to reverse the decision to ordain women. The issue has cost some denominations members who understood maleness as a necessity for church leadership, as has the decision to not ordain women cost other denominations members, including Latter-day Saints. The issue became a kind of political marker between churches, signaling where a church might stand on other issues that divided conservative and liberal Christians over the past century.

The LDS OrdainWomen.org movement has received a lot of attention since its founding a year ago, much of it negative from men and women who see the group as opposing God’s will and/or embarrassing the church. For a long time, raising the idea of women’s ordination has been a taboo in LDS culture, a kind of redline of apostasy since the last real activist work in the 1980’s and 1990’s ended unsuccessfully.

Even many contemporary Mormon feminists have been skeptical of the call for ordination, either preferring incremental reforms in the short term, objecting to the particular strategies of the OrdainWomen organization, or preferring other possible solutions to inequality in the church that do not involve ordination. The backlash from LDS hierarchy and lay people has served to rally many Mormon feminists to their cause, but has also stressed the fractures within Mormon feminism toward factionalism. Everyone recognizes a problem, including the leadership who has reportedly been engaged in “helpful conversations” about women’s concerns, and many minor reforms have been trickling out in recent years, but a definitive solution has been elusive.

Still, ordination faces an uphill battle for two reasons. First, Mormonism’s distinctive ecclesiology makes female ordination more complex than other denominations. Ordination is not just for one who feels called to the ministry, but rather is offered to all eligible men beginning at 12 years old, progressing through various ranks along the way. Ordination of women would potentially require the complete restructuring of Mormon communities, which is why it is not necessarily an elegant and easy solution to the problems of inequality. As it stands, beginning at age 12 men and women follow two tracks, coming together for some common instruction, but largely existing as separate organizational groups with separate leadership structures. Such a division has worked well since the founding of the female Relief Society by Joseph and Emma Smith for women in 1842, with various restructurings over time. What would happen to the practice of having separate spaces for men and women to discuss and teach and minister to one another remains unclear if Mormon women were admitted to the priesthood, and many lament the idea that such semi-independent women’s organizations might fall by the wayside.

The second issue is how the LDS church is governed. While other churches often function democratically, to greater and lesser degrees, and the issues are decided variously by appeals to scripture, tradition, and hermeneutical contexts, the LDS church is governed from the top with most major reforms requiring a revelation. In this sense, scriptural and historical warrants, validations of the problematics of the current practice, and even the will of the leaders themselves may not be enough to bring about the change. Just how exactly such a revelation might come, and if it might come at all, is understood to be beyond the powers of the leadership. Navigating such an organizing structure for change is difficult, and leaders are defensive about the appearance that revelation comes at the behest of social forces.

In spite of these challenges, Mormonism has a gender inequality problem, not only culturally, but structurally. This issue is one which the leadership is aware of and has been tinkering with in various ways. Whether such tinkering can satisfy enough of the moderates for the short term to relieve pressure on the call for women’s ordination remains to be seen. Still, perhaps ordination is the only true solution to the problem and all such tinkering only puts off, and makes more painful, an inevitable necessity.

I suspect that as long as the church does not ordain women, there will always be a number of women and men in the church who will object to the practice of a male-only priesthood and that it will continue to be a reason people will cite for activism or leaving. Whatever happens to OrdainWomen.org as a movement, the issue is not going away, and the negative reactions to the concept uncover much of the problematic attitudes and structures of the status quo. As a community, we may have to develop better ways of having this conversation, because it will be with us for a long time still.

moderate Mormon feminism

Priesthood

Revelation

women's ordination

Previous Post

March 10, 2014

Doctrinal Disparity & Fragile Faith

Next Post

March 24, 2014 No More Strangers

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American society Art baptism Blogging Book of Mormon Book review Brigham Young Brigham Young University Bundy Catholicism Christianity Communalism Community of Christ conferences conversion correlation Culture denominations Digital History Discipline Councils diversity Doctrine Donald Trump education Emma Smith ethics family feminism fiction Film review food French Polynesia Fundamentalism Gay rights Gender global Gun politics Halloween health History Honor Code hymns Joseph Smith Kirtland Temple law of consecration massacre site military Ministering missionary moderate Mormon feminism Modern Mormonism Mormon origins Mormon War Mormonism Mormonism, politics, Romney Obama Peace politics Polygamy Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Priesthood Protestantism Race Religious freedom Revelation Reviews sacred sites Scientology Scripture Secularization See Stones sexual assault Star Wars television temples Tithing Utah violence war women's ordination

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who recognized Jesus as "the Christ" in the Temple as an infant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Simeon Peter Zechariah Joseph