An American Religion

Last updated on: October 3, 2012 at 3:57 am by Matthew Bowman

An American Religion 2012-10-03T03:57:51+00:00 Matthew Bowman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In Tampa a few weeks ago twenty thousand Republicans bowed their heads and listened solemnly to the Mormon Ken Hutchins offer a prayer. They applauded a string of Mormons who stood to bear witness to Mitt Romney’s service in his Mormon congregation. Historically speaking, this was remarkable. A century and a half ago, after all, this same party’s convention denounced Mormonism for being as barbaric as slavery.

On the face of it the Republican convention of 2012 seems a microcosm of modern American religious tolerance. In the Mormon Mitt Romney and the Catholic Paul Ryan the GOP has, after all, crafted their first presidential ticket since the Civil War without a Protestant. But digging deeper reveals a different story: America has adapted less to these religions than they have adapted themselves to America. The real story of Mormonism in this election season is not one of the Latter-day Saints alone, but rather about the ways in which the polarities of American political culture have insistently tugged American religions into their orbit

The deeper premise here is the same that much of American Protestantism has shared since the Revolutionary War: that religion can be expressed through the structures and language of American politics. Christianity, according to these assumptions, is compatible with and even reliant upon the classical liberalism of American individualism, can be enacted in laws, and supports the principles of democratic government. Though its advocates often invoke the will of God to argue for their positions, they tend to speak of those positions in the language and frameworks of American politics – what should be legal or illegal in American law, taught or not taught in American schools, sponsored or not sponsored by the government.

So tightly binding religion to the presumptions of individualism and democracy that underlay American politics makes Americans suspicious of religions that don’t seem to subscribe to those presumptions. Both Mormonism and Catholicism spent a great deal of time in the nineteenth century butting heads with government and warding off, with mixed success, mobs worried that their faithful were unfit for participation in American government. In some ways those fears were true. Mormons in the nineteenth century routinely engaged in bloc voting, because their religion taught them that communal solidarity and obedience to the prophetic voices of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young were more important than the rugged individualism of Jacksonian democracy. Similarly, throughout the nineteenth century Catholic prelates in the Vatican claimed over and over that their faithful in America should indeed hearken to the leadership of the pope. Well into the twentieth century, both John F. Kennedy and Mitt Romney struggled with the fears these things evoked.

But the Democrats nominated Kennedy, and he won, and the Republicans have nominated Romney, and hope he will. These men overcame these fears primarily because they, and their fellow believers, have adopted an essentially Protestant relationship between religion and politics. Kennedy famously spurned the pope (in a speech to Protestant ministers, no less) that his faith did not speak for him on political issues – even issues Catholic leadership might think to be religious. Mormons abandoned their nineteenth century aspirations to a political kingdom in Utah and spent much of the twentieth century emphasizing personal responsibility, hard work, and moral discipline – those aspects of their faith which bring them into conversation with American political culture. Many Mormons happily commute to work in Salt Lake City and Provo, only vaguely remembering, if at all, a time when their leaders dreamed of a separatist theocratic economic community in the West, far distant from the corrupting elements of burgeoning nineteenth century consumer capitalism and the unreliable mob-driven tides of American democracy. Today Mitt Romney barely imagines that there might be any reason why his faith and his nation might come into conflict.

The media’s sudden interest in Mormonism and the regular airing of the Mormon church’s odder laundry that followed obscured the most important thing about Mormonism – how like other American religions it has become. When Hutchins thanked God for “freedoms that bless us with the capacity to live and worship according to the dictates of our conscience,” the camera caught Republicans nodding. By the twenty-first century Catholics and evangelicals and Mormons alike could all join in affirmation of individual liberty, and finally understand the phrase to mean something similar.

Mormonism, politics, Romney

Previous Post

September 26, 2012

Narrating the LDS Past: Past and Present

Next Post

October 8, 2012 One Miracle at a Time

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American society Art baptism Blogging Book of Mormon Book review Brigham Young Brigham Young University Bundy Catholicism Christianity Communalism Community of Christ conferences conversion correlation Culture denominations Digital History Discipline Councils diversity Doctrine Donald Trump education Emma Smith ethics family feminism fiction Film review food French Polynesia Fundamentalism Gay rights Gender global Gun politics Halloween health History Honor Code hymns Joseph Smith Kirtland Temple law of consecration massacre site military Ministering missionary moderate Mormon feminism Modern Mormonism Mormon origins Mormon War Mormonism Mormonism, politics, Romney Obama Peace politics Polygamy Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Priesthood Protestantism Race Religious freedom Revelation Reviews sacred sites Scientology Scripture Secularization See Stones sexual assault Star Wars television temples Tithing Utah violence war women's ordination

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus do at the wedding in Cana?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Walked on water Fed the guests Turned water into wine Healed a sick child