Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Peculiar People

“I’m a Mormon, yes I am!”

Last updated on: April 27, 2012 at 10:03 am   by Patrick Mason

“I’m a Mormon, yes I am!” 2012-04-27T10:03:48+00:00 Patrick Mason

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Like Rosalynde Welch, one of my early musical memories (besides my oldest brother blasting Van Halen through the walls) is of gathering around the record player listening to Janeen Brady’s annoyingly catchy song, “I’m a Mormon”:

I’m a Mormon, yes I am!
And if you want to study a Mormon I’m a living specimen.
Maybe you think I’m just like anybody else you see,
But trust in my word,
You’ll quickly observe,
I’m different as can be!

I don’t know if the creators of the much-ballyhooed “I’m a Mormon” ad campaign had Brady’s song rattling around in their brains.  If so, they apparently remembered the first couple lines — Maybe you think I’m just like anybody else — but forgot the rest of the stanza — I’m different as can be!

Elsewhere on Patheos this week, two Roman Catholic writers offered critiques of Mormonism by invoking the “I’m a Mormon” campaign:  the first, by Fr. Dwight Longenecker, less-than-subtly titled “I Am Not a Mormon”; and the second, by Mark Shea, urging his readers to ignore the Mormon ads that seem to pop up incessantly while they’re getting their daily dose of online religion at Patheos.

(Shea’s broader point regards the falsity of the Mormon historical narrative about ancient Christian apostasy, which then renders the entire religion categorically “unnecessary.”  This is a red herring:  faith in either the Roman Catholic or Latter-day Saint construction of history is ultimately subjective—one narrative is not objectively more plausible than the other, despite what apologists or detractors on either side may say.)

More interesting to me is Fr. Longenecker’s column.  He quotes a correspondent who says he is Mormon “because it bears good fruit in my life.”  This tells Longenecker that contemporary Mormonism is “all about fruit” but not about truth.  Mormonism is attractive, in other words, because it makes people nice and happy and successful.  Mormonism is thus the American religion par excellence — it is all about product, self-fulfillment, and happiness.  But by Longenecker’s calculation, it also means that Mormonism is not “a Christian religion in any sense at all.”  Why?  Because Christianity/Catholicism:

isn’t really about making me happy or healthy or successful or neat and tidy.  It’s not really about good orthodontics.  I can get all that elsewhere without belonging to a religion. . . .

I am not a Catholic because it “bears good fruit” or makes me a nice person.  Religion is not a set of table manners.

I’m a Catholic for the salvation of my soul.

Fr. Longenecker puts his finger on a very real tension for believers, a tension going back to the New Testament:  are followers of Jesus supposed to be the city on the hill, or the yeast that invisibly leavens the loaf?

The “I’m a Mormon” campaign seems to draw its inspiration from the Apostle Paul:  “I am made all things to all people, that I might by all means save some” (1 Cor. 9:22).  The standard script for the internet spots is to depict Mormons of all ages, races, nationalities, and socioeconomic backgrounds simply living their lives — from the prosaic to the extraordinary.  They are parents, surfers, journalists, humanitarians, farmers, veterans, musicians, grandparents, firefighters, lawyers, scientists.  And they are Mormon.

From a PR perspective, the campaign is remarkable.  Launched in summer 2010 in cities across America, it really made waves when it hit Times Square in summer 2011.  The campaign now features over 100 professionally produced video profiles of individuals, plus over 95,000 user-generated profiles from Church members, which resulted in over 1 million online chats on the site last year.  (These stats were provided to me by LDS Public Affairs.)  The ads are extraordinarily well-made, thoughtful, respectful, and often quite moving.  They have made Stephen Colbert jealous.  The church clearly intends the ads to grease the wheels of its missionary effort, especially in terms of diversifying its profile and outreach.

But there is a fundamental problem with the campaign:  if Mormons are just like you, then why do you need to be Mormon?

The very tagline — “…and I’m a Mormon” — implicitly suggests that Mormonism is an incidental identity, in a “it just so happens” type of way.  Even the religious messaging of the ads — I learned to forgive, I learned to serve, I learned to love — is generically Christian, even generically ethical.  Like Fr. Longenecker says, “I can get that elsewhere.”

Still, Longenecker goes too far in suggesting the LDS Church is moving away from making serious truth claims.  One need only visit a weekly Sunday meeting, or sit in on an early morning seminary class of high school students, or have the missionaries over to your house.  Self-identifying Mormons far-and-away exhibit greater religiosity, commitment, and knowledge of their own doctrines than virtually any other group.  (See, among others, Robert Putnam and David Campbell’s American Grace and the Pew Forum’s “Mormons in America” study.)

In my mind, what the “I’m a Mormon” campaign actually reveals is twofold:  first, that the LDS Church is, in pragmatic fashion, grasping at any strategy to maintain growth, particularly in the United States, where real growth has more or less flatlined (or may even be negative); second, that this is a young religion still desperately trying to gain legitimacy and validation.

If you have to keep telling everyone that you’re just like them, chances are you’re not.  And last time I checked, being different was sort of the whole point of Mormonism.

Mormonism, politics, Romney

Previous Post



April 26, 2012

Domestic Violence and Mormonism

Next Post



April 30, 2012 Other People’s Dead


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American society Art baptism Blogging Book of Mormon Book review Brigham Young Brigham Young University Bundy Catholicism Christianity Communalism Community of Christ conferences conversion correlation Culture denominations Digital History Discipline Councils diversity Doctrine Donald Trump education Emma Smith ethics family feminism fiction Film review food French Polynesia Fundamentalism Gay rights Gender global Gun politics Halloween health History Honor Code hymns Joseph Smith Kirtland Temple law of consecration massacre site military Ministering missionary moderate Mormon feminism Modern Mormonism Mormon origins Mormon War Mormonism Mormonism, politics, Romney Obama Peace politics Polygamy Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Priesthood Protestantism Race Religious freedom Revelation Reviews sacred sites Scientology Scripture Secularization See Stones sexual assault Star Wars television temples Tithing Utah violence war women's ordination

Select a Month October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What year was the King James Bible first published?

Select your answer to see how you score.

1611 1701 1492 1517

Related posts from Peculiar People

Latter-day Saint

To the People Defending the Church's Decision to...

Peculiar People

Latter-day Saint

The Women Who Enable Abusive Men

Peculiar People

Latter-day Saint

Joseph, Potiphar's Wife, and the Truth about False...

Peculiar People

Latter-day Saint

Robert Kirby and Edgy Mormon Men

Peculiar People

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Latter-day Saint

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all Latter-day Saint blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube