Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Religion News
Christianity Shouldn’t Be Infused With Politics—It Is a Politic

Christianity Shouldn’t Be Infused With Politics—It Is a Politic

Last updated on: July 3, 2019 at 9:38 am by Tim Suttle

Christianity Shouldn’t Be Infused With Politics—It Is a Politic 2019-07-03T09:38:21-06:00 Tim Suttle

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Christianity is mostly a matter of politics—politics defined by the gospel. The call to be part of the gospel is a joyful call to be adopted by an alien people, to join a countercultural phenomenon, a new polis called the church.” Resident Aliens, p.30

When Stanley Hauerwas says, as he often does, that Christianity is a matter of politics, he doesn’t mean American liberal or conservative politics. He’s saying Christianity is not a belief system. It’s way bigger than that. Christianity is a whole new way to be human that requires a complete reordering of the way we organize our lives both personally and communally—or politically. Christianity is a politic.

Christianity, as a politic, pushes us to ask how we should organize (or reorganize) our common life in order to be more faithful to the way of Jesus. It prompts us first to wonder what kind of society the church ought be in order to image God to our world and help guide the world to organize differently. Do we truly embody a genuine alternative to the way of being we find in the culture at large?

Individualism and Unchecked Desire
The biggest problem with how the church has tried to answer those questions is, for Hauerwas, individualism and unchecked desire. Our society is obsessed with personal rights and freedoms, mostly because nobody wants to acknowledge limits to their own desires. Most people see themselves as autonomous individuals, shrink-wrapped and self-determined, ready to chase their own personal version of the good life. The assumption is that society’s role—the role of government—is to assist each of us in meeting our desires, or at least to keep others out of our way. Christians who see the world in those terms have an imagination shaped by liberal democracy and consumerism much more than by the church.

“The primary entity of democracy is the individual, the individual for whom society exists mainly to assist assertions of individuality. Society is formed to supply our needs, no matter the content of those needs. Rather than helping us to judge our needs, to have the right needs which we exercise in right ways, our society becomes a vast supermarket of desire… what we call freedom becomes the tyranny of our own desires.” Resident Aliens, p.32

Hauerwas says that the American idea of a good society ends up being one that can insure that, in the end, everybody gets to be his or her own tyrant.

By contrast, the Christian story says: you are not an individual, you are a person, which implies an intrinsic connection to others. It also suggests that limits are good for us. The word “human” names one who submits to a human community that will inevitably shape and form the person we are becoming. Humans are constituted and determined by our community, that’s what it means to be a person. A Christian is a person who belongs—first and foremost—to the people of God.

The Christian community is supposed to refuse to help us meet our every individualistic desire. Instead, the church is supposed to shape our desires, teaching us to say “yes” to humanizing desires and “no” to dehumanizing ones. The result is the creation of a people who are better together than they would be apart. The word “Christian” names a person who as submitted to the kind of community that refuses to baptize our every desire, and who does so in the name of Christ. Once we have been named a Christian, we should find it hard to be named by anything else—especially names like Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal.

To organize our common life together as a church in a way that is faithful to Christ is a profoundly political act, on that is much more powerful than the Christian political action linked to conservative or liberal political action. Part of how we recognize a truly Christian politics is that it does not draw its strength from political or economic power. Truly Christian politics draws its strength and influence from our ability to offer the world a true vision of a good life, a genuine alternative way to organize, a new way of being in the world that is better than the one the culture has to offer.

But for this to work, there has to be a “there,” there. There has to be “new creation” in our way of being together. Christian politics is marked by peacemaking, enemy love, forgiveness, grace, hospitality, and unity–pretty much everything Jesus teaches in the Sermon on the Mount. If we organize our common life together around those kinds of things, then we will image God, and Christianity becomes our politics. If we merely baptize American political parties with religious language, then we worship some other god under the banner of American conservatism or liberalism. We might be doing politics, but not Christian politics.

Part of the reason the church keeps getting tripped up is that we have been taught to think our political choices exist on a continuum between left-wing liberalism and right-wing conservatism. But those two camps are really just two sides of the same coin, because both assume the job of the state is to help people pursue their own limitless desires. What’s worse, most American liberals and conservatives seem blind to the fact that society is constantly shaping our desires, largely through mass media and marketing. Businesses don’t spend billions a year on advertising because it doesn’t work. Both left and right wing American politics support the same status quo of radical individualism and the tyranny of individual rights and personal choices. Unchecked, these fuel our virulent consumerism and ravage our environment. Both parties assume their job is to make the world the kind of place where you can have whatever you want without any limits or judgment.

That is a profoundly un-Christian view of reality.

The Real Christian Political Conflict
Christians have a different approach to politics. We believe our job within society is not to bend society to our will. Our job is to season (like salt) society’s understanding of what it means to have right desires in the first place. We do this by embodying Christ in our common life in bold opposition to a culture that usually responds by telling us to go to hell. Hauerwas envisions a completely different continuum for Christian politics. He would put liberals, conservatives, and political parties on the same side of the continuum, pursuing the same goal of individualism and the tyranny of distorted desire. On the other side of the continuum he would place the church’s prophetic witness to the State: a way of organizing our common life that constitutes a fundamental challenge to the individualism, consumerism, and nationalism of our culture.

The church’s politics involves embodying a better way to organize—a better politics—that flows from the cultivation of right desires, and the habits of obedience that transform human character. Through a long slow communal obedience to the way of Christ, we experience the deep ontological repair that results in human flourishing for all the world to see. The way Christians organize our common life together is supposed to call into question the dominant culture, not baptize it with religious language.

The real Christian political conflict isn’t between left and right, it’s between politics as usual and the (in our current climate, almost non-existent) prophetic Christian witness to the State.

Too much of what passes for Christian political engagement is carried out by people who have never undergone serious Christian formation. Most Christians in America are more American than Christian. Hauerwas often offers as proof, the fact that most of them teach their children they have a choice about whether they wish to be called Christians, but not about whether they wish to be called Americans. National identity goes all the way down, even in the church. These are people who cling to their Bible, but don’t ever even read it, much less follow its teaching. Without serious formation among a peculiar people, Americans end up simply baptizing their own brand of party politics with religious language.

As a result, most American Churches end up inoculating their members with just enough Jesus to make them immune to the real thing. Her members default to a political party with a totally inured conscience. That’s where we are. I mean, nobody who begins with “Greater love has no one than the one who lays down their life for a friend,” could ever end up with the American brand of radical individualism. Nobody who begins with “Consider the lilies…” could ever end up with present day consumer capitalism. Nobody who has taken seriously the story of the Good Samaritan could end up with nationalism.

The church is meant to be the one community who takes seriously God’s view of what it means to be human and to live faithfully. Only this kind of commitment can produce a truly Christian politics, because, as Hauerwas says, “The church gives us interpretive skills, a truthful understanding whereby we first see the world for what it is.” Resident Aliens, 38

The Church in America will never get anywhere, politically, by leveraging the power of political parties, and especially not by getting in bed with Donald Trump in the name of political power. We will only make political progress when we embody something real, something different, something compelling and peaceful. Only then will we be able to discern which of the current political players in our society we can work with, and which we must resist. Once we have learned to see the world truly–not through the lens of a political party–we will know how to engage in the American political process, or any other for that matter. But, until the church begins to commit ourselves to the deep ontological repair of Christian formation, and to changing the way we live our lives so as to resist the idolatry of individualism, consumerism, and nationalism, we will continue to flounder and fail to bear witness to the better way.

It takes a lot of courage to claim Jesus is our politics. He has taught us how to live. I’m praying for courage these days.

Previous Post

March 27, 2019

The Science of Fine-Tuning the Soul: Henri Nouwen's 26 Dials on the Human Heart

Next Post

September 12, 2019 The Ragamuffin and the Walking Wall

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion corruption Donald Trump elections Empire Entertainment Ezra Klein ideology Justice Lacan politics race Sports Ta-Nehisi Coates Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 March 2026 September 2025 March 2025 June 2024 January 2024 December 2023 May 2023 February 2023 October 2022 April 2022 March 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 March 2020 September 2019 July 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 August 2010 July 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where did Elijah confront the prophets of Baal?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mount Horeb Mount Carmel Mount Zion Mount Sinai