Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

paperbacktheology

Finding Integrity on the Political Right

Last updated on: May 11, 2018 at 8:55 am   by Tim Suttle

Finding Integrity on the Political Right 2018-05-11T08:55:33-06:00 Tim Suttle

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was nineteen years old when I showed up to work for a summer at Kanakuk camp outside of Branson, MO. I had my dates wrong, and was a full day early. So one of my supervisors, Doug Goodwin, let me tag along with him on his 24 hour break. Before we left he was clearing off his desk and searching for an envelope containing $150 in petty cash. He needed the money to buy supplies for an upcoming camp event. I followed him as he looked in three or four places around the grounds where the envelope might’ve been, but we never found it.

When I asked if he needed to ask for more cash, he said, “No, I’ll pay it back. It was my responsibility, and my integrity is worth more than 150 dollars.”

My integrity is worth more than 150 dollars … that line has stuck with me for nearly thirty years. (Also Goodwin hasn’t aged in thirty years either, so there are crazy things happening on more than one level).

What is your integrity worth? Can you even put a price on integrity? How much is my integrity worth as a person, as a disciple, as a husband, father, or pastor?

The word integrity has an interesting semantic field that combines: 1) a kind of natural adherence to moral and ethical principles that flow from one’s intrinsic moral character, with 2) a sense of wholeness, completeness, an undiminished purity of being. Integrity is the word we use to describe people who seem to know what it means to be human, and they pursue that vision with great fidelity. They practice their own humanity faithfully in the world. That’s integrity… not that people can’t be flawed but they’re trying their best to hold this all together. A person’s integrity will ripple into their community and impact those around them, much like Doug Goodwin’s integrity all those years ago still impacts me.

Corruption is what we call it when someone surrenders their integrity–their sense of wholeness and moral character, their basic humanity–for the sake of money, sex, or power. Corruption is a dehumanizing force that renders people less than fully human. It is a failure to keep faith with the human family. Corruption matters because it damages not only the corrupt person, but also the community of which they are a part. It’s the powerful line from the poet: “If you are here unfaithfully with us, you’re causing terrible damage” (Rumi).

Too many of us have developed the bad habit of excusing those who run for high office from a test of integrity, as though a certain amount of corruption is just baked into the cake. All politicians are the same (corrupt) so let’s make sure our side wins, right?

Who convinced us that this is how things have to be? It’s been inspiring to watch John McCain and Jeff Flake, or conservatives like David Frum, Bill Kristol, Nicole Wallace, David Brooks, George Will, Mona Charen and newer voices like Evan McMullin and David French who have refused to sacrifice their integrity for the satisfaction of a victory. This group  might be the only ones, on the right or the left, who still have their 150 dollars.

Corruption matters, in terms of the office of the presidency itself and what it means to sit in that chair. We cannot accept corruption in the oval office because democracy is an idea, and the president is the primary custodian of that idea. The office of the presidency must be held by someone who buys into the idea of integrity as much as democracy. Presidents don’t have to be perfect–that’s why we have the separation of powers–but they have to display a sense of wholeness and moral character.

Presidents who lack this basic sense of integrity–no matter their political party–will undermine the fabric of our society, and do great damage to our democracy. Nixon’s corruption did great damage. Bill Clinton’s basic lack of integrity did great damage… which brings me to my point.

It’s time for all of us–Republican and Democrat alike–to admit that our country is being led by a corrupt man who surrounds himself with corrupt people. They are not faithfully among us, and they are doing great damage. It’s starting to feel like those who refuse to admit this are either willfully blind, or have lost sight of what really matters.

The presidency is not a means through which to enact our own political will. The presidency is a stewardship of our democracy, the preservation of an idea. The person who holds the office must demonstrate that they believe in the idea. They do so by living a life of integrity–wholeness and moral character–and by eschewing any hint of corruption. If the president cannot lead with integrity–which is to say, if the president is corrupt–then the president does not deserve to hold that office, and must not be allowed to continue.

How much is your integrity worth? I say, it is worth much more than the price of continuing to support this president, even if he enacts every single policy you believe in.

Uncategorized

Bill Kristol

corruption

David Brooks

David French

David Frum

Donald Trump

Evan McMullin

George Will

integrity

Kanakuk

Mona Charen

Nicole Wallace

Rumi

Trump

Previous Post



April 20, 2018

The Best Description of Puberty I've Ever Read: A Burning Desire for Home

Next Post



June 18, 2018 Monday Morning Confessional Returns


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion corruption Donald Trump elections Empire Entertainment Ezra Klein ideology Justice Lacan politics race Sports Ta-Nehisi Coates Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 March 2026 September 2025 March 2025 June 2024 January 2024 December 2023 May 2023 February 2023 October 2022 April 2022 March 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 March 2020 September 2019 July 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 August 2010 July 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Timothy was instructed to avoid godless chatter and opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Paperback Theology

Progressive Christian

The 100% Failure-Rate of Our Current Political Leadership

Paperback Theology

Progressive Christian

Artists Are the Antidote to Authoritarianism

Paperback Theology

Progressive Christian

Why Corruption Matters

Paperback Theology

Progressive Christian

How Does This All End? How Do We...

Paperback Theology

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Pastoral Wisdom for Responding to Sermon Pushback

Getting sermon pushback on your social justice sermon? Learn practical, Proverbs-based strategies...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube