Tyler Hamilton, Lance Armstrong and the Power of a Secret

Last updated on: January 3, 2013 at 8:57 am by Tim Suttle

Tyler Hamilton, Lance Armstrong and the Power of a Secret 2013-01-03T08:57:28-07:00 Tim Suttle

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Over the break I read Tyler Hamilton’s memoir The Secret Race: Inside the Hidden World of the Tour de France: Doping, Cover-ups, and Winning at All Costs. If you love memoir, I highly recommend it. Hamilton, via a talented ghost-writer in Daniel Coyle, renders a detailed and vulnerable telling of the story behind the rise and fall of Lance Armstrong during his epic Tour de France winning streak.

In bike racing all of the top riders are naturally gifted athletes who train like madmen and know how to push their bodies to the limit. The difference between winning and losing (luck, wrecks, injury aside), is how well you manipulated three things:

Weight/Body Fat: You have to carry every pound, so a low body weight is key.
Watts/Watts per kg: How much power can you produce in relation to your weight.
Hematocrit: the volume of oxygen carrying red blood cells in your blood stream.

Weight was simple – they starved themselves even while training like crazy. This is why most riders didn’t use steroids or HCG – they didn’t want the weight gain associated with those drugs because it slows you down. Bulk is for sprinters. These guys were marathon machines.

Watts were straight forward, too. They all were absolutely nuts about pushing themselves to the limit year in, year out. Some of the workouts Hamilton describes are insane.

Hematocrit is where things get dicey. By taking the drug EPO, one can boost their hematocrit level. Any rider who tested over 50 was sanctioned. So the key was to get your hematocrit up close to 50 without testing positive for anything. They all used EPO to do it because, at least early on, there was no test to detect EPO.

Hamilton said, “Quickly I figured out just how important hematocrit was. It was not just another number; it was the number, capable of making the difference between having a chance at winning and not.” (p.54) He says that nobody could win the tour at that time without doping. It was impossible. You could win a one or two day race, but not the tour. The more you train, the lower your hematocrit goes. It drops even more over the course of 21 races in 23 days.

So, they used testosterone mostly during training and on days off during longer races so it would leave their system before they were tested. They used EPO constantly to keep their hematocrit up. And on off days during the TDF, they would get blood transfusions.

Wasn’t it a level playing field? Here’s a footnote written by Coyle:

“The answer, according to scientists, is no, because every drug affects different people differently. In the case of EPO, it is particularly illusory, due to the varying opportunities for improvement created by the UCI’s 50 percent hematocrit limit… Hamilton’s natural hematocrit is typically 42. Taking enough EPO to get to 50 means he could raise [it] 8 points, an increase of 19 percent… consider a different rider who has a natural hematocrit of 48. Under the 50 percent rule, that rider could only take enough EPO to add 2 points, or 4 percent more red blood cells – a power increase of one-fourth of Hamilton’s… Also, studies show that some people respond more to EPO than others, in addition some people respond more than others to the increased training enabled by EPO… bottom line: EPO and other drugs don’t level the physiological playing field; they just shift it to new areas and distort it. As Dr. Michael Ashenden puts it, “The winner in a doped race is not the one who trained the hardest, but the one who trained the hardest and whose physiology responded best to the drugs.”” (p.62)

The most fascinating part was Hamilton’s reflection on the toll lying about doping took on his life. Here’s what he wrote:

“Here’s what I was learning: secrets are poison. They suck the life out of you, they steal your ability to live in the present, they build walls between you and the people you love. Now that I’d told the truth, I was tuning into life again. I could talk to someone without have to worry or backtrack or figure out their motives, and it felt fantastic… One afternoon, I was doing some business research on the Internet, looking at training websites. As happened sometimes, an ad with a photo of Lance popped up. Usually, seeing his face made me wince, and I’d click the window closed. But this time, for some reason, I found myself staring at his face, noticing that Lance had a big smile, a nice smile. It made me remember how he used to be, how good he was at making people laugh… I found myself feeling sorry for Lance… I was sorry in the largest sense, sorry for him as a person, because he was trapped, imprisoned by all the secrets and lies. I thought: Lance would sooner die than admit it, but being forced to tell the truth might be the best thing that ever happened to him.” (264-5)

Previous Post

January 2, 2013

Top Paperback Theology Posts of 2012

Next Post

January 4, 2013 If You Haven't Seen This Yet... Les Miserables Family Reaction - Your Friday Funny!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion corruption Donald Trump elections Empire Entertainment Ezra Klein ideology Justice Lacan politics race Sports Ta-Nehisi Coates Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 March 2026 September 2025 March 2025 June 2024 January 2024 December 2023 May 2023 February 2023 October 2022 April 2022 March 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 March 2020 September 2019 July 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 August 2010 July 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the name "Israel" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He struggles with God Father of a multitude Mountain of God The Lord provides