John Lennon, Cee Lo Green, Peter Rollins, and the End of Religion

Last updated on: January 12, 2012 at 8:35 am by Tim Suttle

John Lennon, Cee Lo Green, Peter Rollins, and the End of Religion 2012-01-12T08:35:00-07:00 Tim Suttle

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On New Year’s Eve – Cee Lo Green stepped in it. The Rolling Stone headline read: “Cee Lo Green Outrages John Lennon Fans by Changing Lyrics to ‘Imagine.’” The controversy could shed new light on a great old song.

THE SONG: I’ve always loved the song Imagine. For one thing, I grew up on the piano. I’ve played well over 1500 gigs now with an acoustic or electric guitar in my hands, but piano still feels like home. Great piano songs in pop music are hard to find, and Lennon & McCartney wrote their fair share: Hey Jude, Let it Be, Life Goes On, My Life, and the immortal Imagine. It was always nice to have something good to pound out besides Van Halen’s Jump, or She’s a Little Runaway (yeah that’s a Bon Jovi reference twice in one week). The song itself is simply brilliant: the piano part is whimsical, the melody beautiful – sad but w/a tinge of hope – then there’s that thing where Lennon jumps up into his head voice – it’s a career song. I’d give anything to have written it.

THE CONTROVERSY: On the New Year’s Eve broadcast from Times Square, Cee Lo Green performed Imagine in a soulful, albeit lack-luster version that was unremarkable in every way except one – he change the words. Lennon’s version was “nothing to kill or die for / and no religion too.” Green’s version? “Nothing to kill or die for / and all religion’s true.” (An interesting stake in the ground for somebody whose big hit is the song “F*#! You!) Lennon fans were not amused, and Green’s been taking a beating. Granted some John Lennon fans are rabid. You should not provoke them, and here they have a reasonable objection. There are specifics to John Lennon’s imagined future, and he was convinced that religion did a lot of harm. Green’s minor lyrical adjustment does change the whole point of the song.

MY TAKE: For one thing, it is art and Cee Lo Green can do whatever he wants to do. You can love it or hate it, but you can’t withhold his right to do whatever he wants with whatever song he wants. Art is free like that, and it’s important for it to remain so.

However, I think perhaps we’ve missed the deeper meaning of the lyric. Truth be told, the line “no religion too,” always bothered me – the whole first verse has. I just don’t share the assumption that religion causes all of the problems in the world. The myth of religious violence is a pervasive thing. It holds that the creation of the nation state was necessary to keep all the crazy religious types from killing each other. It’s taught in every Political Science department at universities, but if you consult the History departments at those same schools, they’ll tell you that it is absolutely not true. It’s just revisionist history. Nations are much more violent than religions, and much of the violence perpetrated by governments and political rulers has been pawned off on religion. From that point of view it’s a lie to say religion is part of the problem and Lennon’s song perpetuates the myth. The abuse of religion, however, is a huge problem, and this is what I think Lennon was talking about.

We can’t forget that Lennon was deeply spiritual and, in a sense, a very religious person. In Imagine, I think he is writing about something a little more nuanced. Could it be he was saying, “let’s get beyond religiosity.” Peter Rollins is working with this same idea. Rollins says that Christianity is not meant to have all of the answers about life, it is meant to bring life. Brilliant… He notes in an interview:

“One of the most interesting things about Christianity is that Christ both founded a religion and yet signaled the end of all religions. Jesus said there will come a time when we worship in spirit and in truth rather than on one mountain or another….Christ thus can be seen as founding an irreligious religion, i.e., a religion that critiques the idea of religion, a religion without religion.”

In the end, I say: good art is not prescriptive, it’s provocation. You don’t have to agree with Lennon or Cee Lo in order for their art to do what it is supposed to do to you. If you sing “Imagine there’s no heaven,” with John Lennon, maybe it can come to mean something different for you, like the rejection of the folk-theologies of heaven and hell that are used to control people, or of Platonic dualism and a privatized Christianity trained only on getting into heaven when you die.

Whatever you think – I have one suggestion. If you have a few moments… watch this. It’s good for your soul! Especially the part at about 2:45 where Yoko looks completely baked…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCX3ZNDZAwY?version=3

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 10, 2012

A Leading Conservative Stumps for the Common Good!

Next Post

January 12, 2012 Pastor Ed Young's Sexperiment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion corruption Donald Trump elections Empire Entertainment Ezra Klein ideology Justice Lacan politics race Sports Ta-Nehisi Coates Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 March 2026 September 2025 March 2025 June 2024 January 2024 December 2023 May 2023 February 2023 October 2022 April 2022 March 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 March 2020 September 2019 July 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 August 2010 July 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How was the crossing of the Jordan similar to the crossing of the Red Sea?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A great wind caused the event The people walked on stones It happened at night The waters were parted