Rob Bell / Love Wins Review – Chapter 8 – Summary

Last updated on: April 2, 2011 at 7:44 am by Tim Suttle

Rob Bell / Love Wins Review – Chapter 8 – Summary 2011-04-02T07:44:00-06:00 Tim Suttle

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Chapter 8 Synopsis

He ends the book with this quote: “May you experience this vast, expansive, infinite, indestructible love that has been yours all along. May you discover that this love is as wide as the sky and as small as the cracks in your heart no one else knows about. And may you know, deep in your bones, that love wins.”

Summary Review:

After reading this book I find that the critiques of Rob Bell are unfounded.

He does not deny the existence of hell or heaven. He does not deny that both can be eternal. His thought it deeply rooted in Christian orthodoxy thought. He confesses the belief that Jesus is the only way. He does not say all roads lead to heaven. He does not say all people end up there eventually.

Here’s what I think. People want to make God out to be about “in” and “out,” when Jesus is about “near” and “far.” “The kingdom of God has come near,” or “you are not far from the kingdom,” this is how Jesus like to talk about it. The in and out folks will never like Rob Bell. Bell, following after Jesus, stresses the great continuity between this life and whatever comes after. Eternal life starts now; this is the witness of the scriptures. Hebrew thought in Jesus’s day really considered death to be another way of being alive. We know there is hell in part because we see people choose hell all the time right here in this life. All of us know people who are “hell-bent,” on hurting themselves and others. We know that there is a heaven, in part, because Jesus proclaimed that heaven was now breaking into the present through his life, teaching, death, and resurrection.

In Bell’s book, the necessity for hell comes from really two places. First, and foremost it comes from the scriptures. Jesus talks about it more than anyone else in the New Testament. It is part of the story of God. Second, and contingently upon the first, it comes from the freedom of the person. We can choose to reject God’s love. Those who do can become totally focused on evil. The people of God have always cried out for justice – all you have to do is read a few psalms to know that. And they have always trusted that there will be a day when God will save us from evil. But if God is going to decisively remove evil, what will God do with those whose life has become consumed by evil? Bell’s take is that God will not override the human will – because true love requires freedom. Thus for those who wish to continue to choose evil, God allows them to do this. He will not allow the innocent to suffer at those who are “hell-bent” on evil for eternity. So there will be a time when God says “enough” to evil. And those who wish to pursue it will have to continue to do so apart from the rest.

The critique of Bell comes because of what he says next. He says he believes that even in the case of those who reject God – God will never stop asking them to turn. God will never stop beckoning them to stop the direction they’ve taken. God does not torment, or punish people – we do that to ourselves, all the while Jesus broken-heartedly continues to invite them to turn. Bell seems to think that this will never stop.

To those who are critics of Rob Bell, I think it needs to be said that it’s totally fine to have different opinions about these things. Doctrine is supposed to be like grammar – it needs to be flexible – more like a conversation than a rigid system. Doctrine is not the point. The right telling/living of the story is the point. The problem comes when people want to call people heretics when they have differing doctrine. The problem comes when people tweet “Farewell Rob Bell” because they are do positive they are right and everyone else is wrong. The arrogance of this position mystifies me. I simply don’t get it.

Rob Bell rightly notes that much of the conflict over hell stems from differing views of God. I acknowledge that I think folks like John Piper have a distorted view of God. But I do not call them heretics; I do not count them out. I do not accuse them of teaching false doctrine. That is an incredibly supercilious. I would call it sinful, because it harms the body of Christ. I also acknowledge that it is possible I also have a distorted view of God – maybe we all inevitably do. But we must always live in fidelity toward one another and the body of Christ. The only horrible thing we can do is break communion, call each other ‘heretics’ and ‘teachers of false doctrine.’

This is a great book, you should all read it. There’s no heretical teaching, no false doctrine here. He’s not espousing universalism – just complete confidence in the God who is love. I think in particular that this book can be powerful for those who have been the victims of evil in their lives. It will help them understand how the momentum of a soul can turn so far away from God that it becomes pure evil. It is also a good way to understand the variety of pictures the scripture gives us on the subject of heaven and hell.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 1, 2011

Rob Bell / Love Wins Review - Chapter 7

Next Post

April 25, 2011

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion corruption Donald Trump elections Empire Entertainment Ezra Klein ideology Justice Lacan politics race Sports Ta-Nehisi Coates Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 March 2026 September 2025 March 2025 June 2024 January 2024 December 2023 May 2023 February 2023 October 2022 April 2022 March 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 March 2020 September 2019 July 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 August 2010 July 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who built the temple in Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abraham David Moses Solomon